Hi Tomeu,
On Thu 14 Jan 2010 16:29, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org writes:
Pygi is still far away from being an usable replacement of static
bindings, at the current development rate.
Why is that? Is the gobject-inspection metadata not expressive enough,
or does pygi not implement all that
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 20:59, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
On Thu 14 Jan 2010 16:29, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org writes:
Pygi is still far away from being an usable replacement of static
bindings, at the current development rate.
Why is that? Is the gobject-inspection
As a user of the python bindings a clarification of the current status
of things and the remaining TODO list would be very helpful. I admit I
have not been following closely, but I bet I am not the only one who
does not know the answers to do these questions:
- how far is pygi from being
