- "Colin Walters" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Shaneeb Kamran
> wrote:
>
> > The main benefit of supporting multiple languages is more to the
> users of
> > the application than to its developers. Like I mentioned in my
> previous
> > mails, if a user wants to add a feature to
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Shaneeb Kamran wrote:
> My take is that GNOME apps should pick C + one of JS,Python and move
> on with actually writing your app and fixing bugs, making it
> compelling, etc.
That would be my plan for worl
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 01:54 +0200, Javier Jardón wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Paolo Borelli proposed me to create this GnomeGoal inspired by the
> recent Murray post [2].
>
> The idea is to validate our xml GtkBuilder files before we release new
> tarballs (in 'make check' and 'make distcheck')
>
> I thi
hi,
Am 08.04.2010 02:54, schrieb Javier Jardón:
> Hello,
>
> Paolo Borelli proposed me to create this GnomeGoal inspired by the
> recent Murray post [2].
>
> The idea is to validate our xml GtkBuilder files before we release new
> tarballs (in 'make check' and 'make distcheck')
>
> I think the
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Shaneeb Kamran wrote:
> The main benefit of supporting multiple languages is more to the users of
> the application than to its developers. Like I mentioned in my previous
> mails, if a user wants to add a feature to his favorite application and he
> knows only a l
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:57 AM, John Palmieri wrote:
>
> - "Shaneeb Kamran" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Johannes Schmid < j...@jsschmid.de >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> >
> > > I am not entirely sure but my guess is adding support for another
> > > language would re
2010/4/8 Javier Jardón :
> I think the GnomeGoal is small, well defined, broadly applicable and
> useful. See this giggle commit as an example [3]
Can't we put stuff like test_gtkbuilder_file_validation.sh in
gnome-common? Seems a bit of a waste to add this to all files.
Richard.
