New module proposal: libpeas

2010-10-04 Thread Steve Frécinaux
Hello Gnomers, I'd like to propose libpeas as part of the desktop release set, or whatever the release team cooked to replace it in Gnome 3.0. libpeas is a library targetted at native applications in Gnome and allowing them to easily provide extensibility through either a C GModule or gobjec

New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-04 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
hi everyone; just like last year, I'm proposing Clutter core as part of the desktop platform - or, pending the new modulesets proposal from the release-team, to the "extended platform". Clutter has been following the GNOME schedule for the past two minor cycles (1.2 and 1.4), and will do so for t

Re: New module proposal: Clutter core

2010-10-04 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! > Clutter is still hosted on a separate server because the Clutter Project > wants to be an umbrella for a set of projects, like language bindings, > toolkits, and applications that may or may not be related to the GNOME > Project. we're fairly liberal with giving people access to the > reposi

Re: external dependency review for 2.91

2010-10-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 22:44 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Hi, I looked over the external dependencies for 2.91 [1]. I've bumped > the recommended versions to current versions in many places. There are > some places where we need to bump mnimal versions: We'll probably also need to add libsocialw

splitting up gnome-games

2010-10-04 Thread Colin Walters
Hi, I'd like to float the idea of splitting up gnome-games upstream into separate git modules. The main rationale is that downstream, we want separate binary packages; this is most convenient to do if upstream is separate modules. Having separate binaries would make application installation/remo

Re: external dependency review for 2.91

2010-10-04 Thread Martyn Russell
On 01/10/10 03:44, Matthias Clasen wrote: Hi, Hi, I looked over the external dependencies for 2.91 [1]. I've bumped the recommended versions to current versions in many places. There are some places where we need to bump mnimal versions: Yes, tracker is definitely one of those. Actually we'

Re: splitting up gnome-games

2010-10-04 Thread Jason Clinton
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:30, Colin Walters wrote: > I'd like to float the idea of splitting up gnome-games upstream into > separate git modules. The main rationale is that downstream, we want > separate binary packages; this is most convenient to do if upstream is > separate modules. > > Having

Re: splitting up gnome-games

2010-10-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, On 04/10/10 17:30, Colin Walters wrote: > I'd like to float the idea of splitting up gnome-games upstream into > separate git modules. The main rationale is that downstream, we want > separate binary packages; this is most convenient to do if upstream is > separate modules. Can't you just cr

Re: New module proposal: libpeas

2010-10-04 Thread Andy Wingo
Hi Steve, On Mon 04 Oct 2010 13:10, Steve Frécinaux writes: > I'd like to propose libpeas as part of the desktop release set, or > whatever the release team cooked to replace it in Gnome 3.0. Libpeas sounds really neat :) Did you solve the toggle refs issue that Owen brought up? Andy -- http

Re: splitting up gnome-games

2010-10-04 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Can't you just create several binary packages out of one source package? Of course. But it's a maintenance pain to do so and helps perpetuate downstream forking of the build system. ___