Hello Gnomers,
I'd like to propose libpeas as part of the desktop release set, or
whatever the release team cooked to replace it in Gnome 3.0.
libpeas is a library targetted at native applications in Gnome and
allowing them to easily provide extensibility through either a C GModule
or gobjec
hi everyone;
just like last year, I'm proposing Clutter core as part of the desktop
platform - or, pending the new modulesets proposal from the
release-team, to the "extended platform".
Clutter has been following the GNOME schedule for the past two minor
cycles (1.2 and 1.4), and will do so for t
Hi!
> Clutter is still hosted on a separate server because the Clutter Project
> wants to be an umbrella for a set of projects, like language bindings,
> toolkits, and applications that may or may not be related to the GNOME
> Project. we're fairly liberal with giving people access to the
> reposi
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 22:44 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Hi, I looked over the external dependencies for 2.91 [1]. I've bumped
> the recommended versions to current versions in many places. There are
> some places where we need to bump mnimal versions:
We'll probably also need to add libsocialw
Hi,
I'd like to float the idea of splitting up gnome-games upstream into
separate git modules. The main rationale is that downstream, we want
separate binary packages; this is most convenient to do if upstream is
separate modules.
Having separate binaries would make application installation/remo
On 01/10/10 03:44, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I looked over the external dependencies for 2.91 [1]. I've bumped
the recommended versions to current versions in many places. There are
some places where we need to bump mnimal versions:
Yes, tracker is definitely one of those. Actually we'
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:30, Colin Walters wrote:
> I'd like to float the idea of splitting up gnome-games upstream into
> separate git modules. The main rationale is that downstream, we want
> separate binary packages; this is most convenient to do if upstream is
> separate modules.
>
> Having
Hi,
On 04/10/10 17:30, Colin Walters wrote:
> I'd like to float the idea of splitting up gnome-games upstream into
> separate git modules. The main rationale is that downstream, we want
> separate binary packages; this is most convenient to do if upstream is
> separate modules.
Can't you just cr
Hi Steve,
On Mon 04 Oct 2010 13:10, Steve Frécinaux writes:
> I'd like to propose libpeas as part of the desktop release set, or
> whatever the release team cooked to replace it in Gnome 3.0.
Libpeas sounds really neat :)
Did you solve the toggle refs issue that Owen brought up?
Andy
--
http
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
>
> Can't you just create several binary packages out of one source package?
Of course.
But it's a maintenance pain to do so and helps perpetuate downstream
forking of the build system.
___
10 matches
Mail list logo