Re: Translating GObject properties names and descriptions

2014-03-06 Thread Sébastien Wilmet
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 07:20:19PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > this blog from Stack Overflow about the introduction of their > localised version in Portuguese gives a nice introduction to the > issue, and some very interesting discussion points: > > http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2014/02/cant-w

Re: Coordination for developer documentations

2014-03-06 Thread Christoph Reiter
(responding to the wrong mail since I just subscribed and don't bother modifying mail headers..) Since it wasn't mentioned so far; outside of gnome.org, on the Python side of things, there exists the GTK+ 3 tutorial [0] maintained by Sebastian Pölsterl (accepts pull requests, but isn't actively wo

Re: Coordination for developer documentations

2014-03-06 Thread Ekaterina Gerasimova
On 6 March 2014 10:07, Christoph Reiter wrote: > (responding to the wrong mail since I just subscribed and don't bother > modifying mail headers..) > > Since it wasn't mentioned so far; outside of gnome.org, on the Python > side of things, there exists the GTK+ 3 tutorial [0] maintained by > Sebas

Re: Status of privacy features in GNOME

2014-03-06 Thread Stef Walter
Andreas or Tobias would know definitively ... but I don't think that any implementation has been undertaken by GNOME as of yet. Stef On 06.03.2014 16:09, Oliver Propst wrote: > Hi, > I'm active in the GNOME engagement team and are currently working on a > article about the 2012-2013 privacy campa

Re: Status of privacy features in GNOME

2014-03-06 Thread Tobias Mueller
Hi. On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 04:41:32PM +0100, Stef Walter wrote: > Andreas or Tobias would know definitively ... but I don't think that any > implementation has been undertaken by GNOME as of yet. that is correct. Cheers, Tobi ___ desktop-devel-list m

Re: Coordination for developer documentations

2014-03-06 Thread Sébastien Wilmet
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:05:30PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > I was mostly concerned by our technical infrastructure for developer > documentation, but that itself has of course been driven by the > content we produced (or wanted to produce), so I don't think they can > really be separated. F

GNOME 3.11.91 release

2014-03-06 Thread Javier Jardón
Hi, the second beta release of the GNOME 3.11 development cycle is finally here! With this release we are officially now in "The String Freeze" [1] (that stacks with all the current freezes): - String Freeze: no string changes may be made without confirmation from the l10n team (gnome-i18n@) an