On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Oh no, that's not what I meant. I was more proposing to pull them
> once, while you develop your stuff, and then shipping them in your own
> tarball. So, don't pull them dynamically when you start building, but
> you keep your own copy o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/2015 05:51 PM, Philip Withnall wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 07:55 -0800, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 2, 2015 6:37 AM, "Philip Withnall"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 12:19 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02,
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> Can't we hide it behind a --this-is-going-away-in-3.18 configure switch?
That was certainly a possibility, but, what's the advantage of doing
it? The bug Antoine pointed to shows that distros that use ConsoleKit
in 3.14 are already shipp
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 10:54:12AM -0500, Ray Strode wrote:
[..]
> >> > I'm wondering if there are distros/platforms that are planning on
> >> > using 3.16 and ConsoleKit together.
[..]
> >> I would not mind removing such support for 3.16 if and only if
> >> reverting the removal is easy and not to
Hi,
>> > I'm wondering if there are distros/platforms that are planning on
>> > using 3.16 and ConsoleKit together.
>> >
>> > I'm leaning toward getting rid of it in 3.16 (versus say 3.18).
>> > Distros, of course, could ship a patch to reverse to removal if
>> > necessary, so I don't think doing
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Ryan Lortie wrote:
hi,
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015, at 10:10, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
FWIW, if you run devhelp with jhbuild, you will get documentation
for
the version of the library in jhbuild.
This is only true if the docs are actually built, which is not the
c
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 11:26 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 09:23 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Searching of gtkmm documentation has been working in devhelp for
> > years,
> > and I've just tested it here both in regular Ubuntu and in jhbuild. I
> > mean, searching of the in
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 19:56 -0800, Philip Chimento wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Philip Withnall
> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 12:19 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:05:00AM +, Philip Withnall
> wrote:
> > > It was suggeste
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 17:11 +0100, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 04:51:32PM +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> > Devhelp could also have a 'next' or 'latest' default profile which could
> > sync the daily? built documentation from gnome.org. Although not sure
> > how useful this
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 16:31 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 02:37:32PM +, Philip Withnall wrote:
> > What do you mean by reaching out to the advisory board? Reaching out for
> > further feedback from them as downstreams, or reaching out for resources
> > to fix such issues?
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 09:23 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> Searching of gtkmm documentation has been working in devhelp for
> years,
> and I've just tested it here both in regular Ubuntu and in jhbuild. I
> mean, searching of the index, of course. I don't think devhelp offers
> full text search for
hi,
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015, at 10:10, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> FWIW, if you run devhelp with jhbuild, you will get documentation for
> the version of the library in jhbuild.
This is only true if the docs are actually built, which is not the case
by default (and, unless we dramatically improve per
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 08:05 +, Philip Withnall wrote:
[snip]
> Handout:
> http://people.collabora.com/~pwith/feedback-from-downstreams/handout.pdf
That mentions this:
"
Gtkmm's documentation is poor in comparison to GTK+'s and it works
really badly in Devhelp. Searching (an important feature w
> Hi Ray.
>
> Thanks a lot asking about this.
> OpenBSD *will* keep using ConsoleKit for 3.16. I expect that we should be
> able to be rid of it for 3.18 -- either using systembsd (far from ready) or
> the logind implementation that ConsoleKit2 is expected to provide iirc or ...
> something els
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 16:51 +, Philip Withnall wrote:
> Documentation is generated from C comments as at the moment,
> reformatted, uploaded to developer.gnome.org, and then some kind of
> online interface can be used to edit the documentation (and possibly
> add
> comments to it) with instant
15 matches
Mail list logo
