Hi,
Philip Withnall wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 11:07 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > I'm a bit surprised by 1) but we could certainly automatically
> > produce
> > a list of maintainers / modules/ time/commits since last release, if
> > that could be useful.
>
> I think 1) would be useful
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 12:09 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Tarballs are due on 2015-11-23 before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME
> > 3.19.2
> > unstable release, which will be delivered on Wednesday. Modules
> > which
> > were proposed for inclusion should try to follow the unstable
> >
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > It's been some months we have those reminder emails sent to
> > devel-announce-list. Maintainers, make sure you are subscribed.
> >
> > Maintainers (bis), please do try to respect the Monday 23:59 UTC
> > deadline, it's really not fun to chase maintainers for days
On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 11:07 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > > It's been some months we have those reminder emails sent to
> > > devel-announce-list. Maintainers, make sure you are subscribed.
> > >
> > > Maintainers (bis), please do try to respect the Monday 23:59
On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 10:52 +, Philip Withnall wrote:
> Would such a list be useful for the release team, as a way of
> tracking who needs nagging? If so, then I hope producing it should
> not be too much of a drain on your time — if it is a drain, then you
> probably shouldn’t do it.
