Hi Adel,
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 04:29 +0200, drago01 via desktop-devel-list wrote:
> Assuming there is a problem in the first place which I doubt. I never
> heard of a case where someone refused to contribute to a project just
> because the default branch is called master.
>
> I'd suggest to focus
Am Mi., 24. Apr. 2019 um 13:57 Uhr schrieb Michael Gratton :
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 13:31, Daniel Mustieles García
> wrote:
> > So hardcoding the name "mainline" to the list of branches that Damned
> > Lies' looks up resolves the problem for you... and tomorrow another
> > maintainer decides
Hello,
Hello,
Javier Jardón, le jeu. 25 avril 2019 23:50:26 -0700, a ecrit:
> The list of updated modules and changes is available here:
>
> https://download.gnome.org/core/3.33/3.33.1/NEWS
It seems that accerciser does not show up here even if I released its
version 3.33.1.
https://download.g
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:14 AM Ask Hjorth Larsen via
desktop-devel-list wrote:
>
> Am Mi., 24. Apr. 2019 um 13:57 Uhr schrieb Michael Gratton :
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 13:31, Daniel Mustieles García
> > wrote:
> > > So hardcoding the name "mainline" to the list of branches that Damned
>
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 10:38 +0200, Niels De Graef via desktop-devel-
list wrote:
> Note that you don't need to script this kind of stuff, if you use the
> following tricks:
>
> # 1. This creates a symbolic link from master to mainline, which
> solves your problem already.
> $ git symbolic-ref refs
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:55, Michael Gratton wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 14:40, Florian Müllner
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:45 PM Carlos Soriano
wrote:
For making this change properly, I have some questions:
- Is there a possibility to redirect master to any other name
some
Hi Michael,
Je ven, 2019-04-26 je 09:24 +1000, Michael Gratton skribis:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 09:02, Carmen Bianca Bakker
> wrote:
> > Defaults and conventions matter. One reason I like GNOME so much is
> > because the defaults are amazing. And while "master" is a bit of a
> > sucky default,
I've seen this thread so far and I'd like to add my POV.
I don't thing master is an offensive word because in Portuguese, among
other meanings, it also means "matrix".
Any choosen work will have a different meaning depending upon culture,
tradition and spoken-language.
We can't though forget to
Dear all,
Am Fr., 26. Apr. 2019 um 10:43 Uhr schrieb Mathieu Bridon
:
>
> On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 10:38 +0200, Niels De Graef via desktop-devel-
> list wrote:
> > Note that you don't need to script this kind of stuff, if you use the
> > following tricks:
> >
> > # 1. This creates a symbolic link fro
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 2:43 AM, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
I guess I am missing something in the process of releasing a version?
Or
is accerciser perhaps just not part of a desktop package set?
Only GNOME core elements are included in the release. accerciser is in
world, not core.
Michael
_
mcatanz...@gnome.org, le ven. 26 avril 2019 11:02:00 -0500, a ecrit:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 2:43 AM, Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> > I guess I am missing something in the process of releasing a version? Or
> > is accerciser perhaps just not part of a desktop package set?
>
> Only GNOME core eleme
I'm a little surprised that nobody has yet mentioned the elephant in
the room. The definition of "git" is not very inclusive:
From https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/git:
British
: a foolish or worthless person
Or from https://www.thefreedictionary.com/git:
n. Chiefly British Slang
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 17:12, wrote:
>
> I'm a little surprised that nobody has yet mentioned the elephant in
> the room. The definition of "git" is not very inclusive:
>
What did I say, upthread, about falling into the "slippery slope" fallacy,
and sticking to the topic of discussion?
Do we ne
Hi,
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 11:12 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> Shall we install our own inclusive symlink for git now, to avoid
> potentially-unpleasant connotations?
Would we be in the position of doing so?
My feeling is that we can control the branch names more easily than the
third-party
Am Fr., 26. Apr. 2019 um 18:12 Uhr schrieb :
> I'm a little surprised that nobody has yet mentioned the elephant in
> the room. The definition of "git" is not very inclusive:
>
> [...]
I really did not want to comment on this thread initially, but I would
like to add a thought to this afterall:
W
Am Fr., 26. Apr. 2019 um 19:11 Uhr schrieb Matthias Klumpp
:
>
> Am Fr., 26. Apr. 2019 um 18:12 Uhr schrieb :
> > I'm a little surprised that nobody has yet mentioned the elephant in
> > the room. The definition of "git" is not very inclusive:
>
> [ ...]
>
> Please don't ready any of the statements
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 20:33, Ask Hjorth Larsen via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
0) It is problematic to work with hundreds of projects when they do
not use the same branch name (translators like myself), but this time
we want to make it consistent, so ...
Hence this is proposing to make the ch
17 matches
Mail list logo
