On 9/12/07, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Agreed.
>
> What is so bad with keeping svn as the master repository (easy to use,
> fast enough, very popular) and if people want to use git or bzr for
> dvcs, then they use git-svn or bzr-svn? Many people can use those to
> branch a svn rep
I am wondering why discussion is continuing in the "Git vs SVN (was:
Can we improve things?)" thread, why the discussion is not happening
here instead ?!
I don't want to offend anyone (so take it lightly), but I am afraid
that many of us are subject to a "Confirmation bias" ... Can't we just
conti
> > I am also afraid that we might be just becoming nothing more but "geek
> > fashion" addicts trying to follow the latest RCS tendency without
> > really building solid and constructive arguments !
>
> I was going to be offended, but you warned :). Now that most probably
> means that you don't h
On 9/16/07, Mikael Hallendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 16 sep 2007 kl. 04.40 skrev Curtis Hovey:
>
> > On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote:
> >> - Keith Packard did a fai
>
> I don't think choosing git just because others did is a good way of making
> choices in general. Although I agree with you to some extend that choosing
> the same than freedesktop makes some sense to keep the toolchain smaller.
>
> I think that an impartial decision has to be made. I wonder if
Hi all,
> >
> > In my opinion Mercurial has much of the benefits of GIT but with the
> > ease of use of SVN. We dropped GIT and SVN at my company in favor of
> > Mercurial.
>
> In what way is Mercurial simpler to use than Git? Looking quickly at
> the Mercurial docs it seemed quite similar to Git
On 9/23/07, Kalle Vahlman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/9/23, Ali Sabil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > > >
> > > > In my opinion Mercurial has much of the benefits of GIT but with the
> > > > ease of use of SVN. We
On 9/24/07, Jason D. Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The critical difference in that analogy is that the thousands and
> thousands of man-hours spent on Gecko are reused in the
> Gnome-ification called Epiphany. As Empathy is proposed, all the work
> in protocol implementation that has come be
> I guess you do not know what ICE is ? Do you ?
>
Last time I checked ICE it was about finding a a quite good routing
path (not always the best) between two endpoints for UDP packets.
> Then can you explain us how ICE can help when STUN does not ? I would
> like to see your argumentation here.
>
On 9/24/07, Damien Sandras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le lundi 24 septembre 2007 à 11:34 +0200, Ali Sabil a écrit :
> > > Then can you explain us how ICE can help when STUN does not ? I would
> > > like to see your argumentation here.
> > >
> > Corre
On 9/27/07, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le jeudi 27 septembre 2007 à 00:48 +0200, Sven Herzberg a écrit :
> > Next question: consistency with the platform
> >
> > The GNOME platform uses LGPL as the license of choice to provide ISVs
> > with a powerful stack that anyone can use -
On Nov 9, 2007 8:01 PM, Richard Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 18:38 +, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> > I created an initially simple configuration system for SCons and wrote
> > SConstruct files for building Richard Hughes gnome-power-manager. It
> > turned out to be a pr
On Nov 11, 2007 9:58 PM, Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 18:20 +0100, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> > Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> > >
> > > I coded distcheck into WAF a couple of months ago. It wasn't even a
> > > difficult task...
> >
> > What about gettext supp
>
> However, the most important point for this discussion is that this
> approach makes it hard to provide a high-level UI a'la Eclipse or Visual
> Studio which is what many many people are used to. One way to do this is
> to use a declarative programming language (e.g. XML) to express the
> build
Hello,
iirc, the GObject documentation states that dispose may be called
multiple times,
and the object must still be usable even after dispose is called, so
freeing memory
in dispose is wrong, even with locks.
Actually both dispose and finalize are needed if your object hold
references to other
m wrong
--
Ali
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 7:00 AM, Ali Sabil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The dispose will be called as
> > many times as necessary to remove the refere
2008/3/26 Sven Herzberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 26.03.2008, 19:13 +0100 schrieb Xavier Claessens:
>
> > Did I forgot something?
> > Xavier Claessens.
>
> Missing password security. And absolute no-go in the current shape.
>
What about the whole GNOME desktop that stores t
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:14:50AM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 08:35 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
> > > I was just wondering why many GNOME developers are using git mirror
> > > and for example no
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:45:34AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > (At least, that's what I understand)
>
> Indeed. This might be hard to do within Bzr (IIRC what Elijah said), due
> to repository format / design.
>
2008/10/24 Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 11:09 +0100, Rui Tiago Cação Matos wrote:
> > In this specific library case, since the API is so simple and you
> > don't know you need it until you somehow check your app's settings
> > it's a no-brainer really.
>
> You could lazy
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:18 AM, John Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Claudio Saavedra wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:10 +, John Carr wrote:
> Lets not turn this into yet another bazaar vs. git war
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:05 PM, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 22:47 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > Probably just like bzr already went through several repository formats
> > and allowed easy upgrades (just like Subversion repository format
> > changed and it didn't cause any pr
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Robin Sonefors wrote:
> On sön, 2009-01-04 at 23:58 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Luca Ferretti
> wrote:
> > > Il giorno dom, 04/01/2009 alle 16.11 -0500, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
> > >
> > >> It seems pretty clear to
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:29:02PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > Uh, but that's exactly how I understood the proposal and I believe that
> > the points I made (that you didn't respond to) still stands: That it's
> > crazy to officially want
> From what I understand, so far there has been one proposal, from Olav, who
> proposed that he and John implement John's idea of implementing a git-serve
> plugin for the bzr repo server. I think many people pointed out the major
> flaws in that scenario. I want to stress that we should not make
t mailing list
> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
_______
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
--
Ali Sabil
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On 4/11/07, Jonathan Kamens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I use a different window manager?
I tried killing metacity, but it just gets restarted by something
automatically. I tried finding a control panel, preferences panel, etc.
that would allow me to control which window manager I use, a
Hello,
I just checked out the gnome live page comparison of the 3 major DRCS, but I
am afraid the page is actually heavily biased toward git, and contains a lot
of outdated/irrelevant informations. I don't want to start a flamewar, but I
think we should rather define a set of criterias that will a
28 matches
Mail list logo
