On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Oh no, that's not what I meant. I was more proposing to pull them
> once, while you develop your stuff, and then shipping them in your own
> tarball. So, don't pull them dynamically when you start building, but
> you keep your own copy o
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Philip Withnall
wrote:
> I can’t think of any reasons why not. Perhaps a GDBus automake snippet
> could be installed by GLib which:
> 1. Installs D-Bus XML interface files.
> 2. Includes rules for building documentation and C/H files from them.
> 3. Validates t
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Pranav Kant wrote:
> Upon some investigation, it seems that `xdg-mime` is returning a wrong
> mimetype for image files inside sandboxed shell. However, it returns a
> valid mimetype outside tracker sandboxed shell. Here is the result of
> running `tracker-extract`
Hi all,
I was wondering if there's any reason we typically don't install on the
system DBus XML interface files for services. On my system, I can see a
bunch of definitions in /usr/share/dbus-1/interfaces, but it's by no means
a complete list of all the services in the system.
Standardizing such a
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
> While we are waiting for the last major features to land in
> gnome-shell and gnome-control-center for 3.9.90, here is a list of
> smaller apps that could do with a release. Even just picking up new
> translations is worthwhile, to show our
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Marco Scannadinari wrote:
I think using the very nice throbber by the Tango people would look a
> lot nicer and reduce the work (?) needed to standardise the throbber
> sizes in GNOME.
>
Hi Marco,
I'm not sure which is the Tango throbber you're referring to...
I
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> hi Cosimo;
>
> do you have some notes as to what kind of API you and Benjamin were
> thinking about? I can probably spare a couple of cycles to work on it
> for 3.10, and it would help me getting up to speed.
>
Hi Emmanuele,
Notes were no
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Allan Day wrote:
> Marco Scannadinari wrote:
> > Cosimo or Benjamin can tell you more about the specifics.
> >
> > Thanks. By Cosmio and Benjamin, do you mean Cosimo Cecchi and Benjamin
> > Otte?
>
> I do indeed. :) (I w
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I wonder if there's a way to avoid this. Perhaps we could bump the version
> of the gir whenever the SONAME changes, so that we would have e.g.
> GnomeDesktop-3.0.typelib for G3.6, but GnomeDesktop-3.8.typelib for G3.8.
> I'm not qui
aster instance itself needed a manual
restart to get the change propagated to the build slaves, and this required
pinging people with a SSH access to the server to do it.
Cosimo
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Philip Withnall wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 18:12 +0100, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
&
than
> ostree/ostbuild, in particular given the "setup costs" of building the
> entirety of gnomeos just to get running. This until we have an SDK and
> application story...
>
> Giovanni
>
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Cosimo Cecchi
> wrote:
Maintaining the Debian jhbuild server running was quite a bit of manual
work for no clear benefit, so I turned it off at some point this fall.
If it's still useful for people, I can try to revive it but IMO Colin's
build server in #testable is a much better solution (even if it's not based
on jhbui
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Piñeiro wrote:
> Well, probably it is because it was a vague idea of "some interesting
> modules", probably we could list them explicitly and see if someone
> catches the ping. Being minimalistic we can start with:
> * clutter (it already has cally, so we can us
Hey Debarshi,
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 13:45 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> We may benefit from having a way to share these widgets among the
> applications. Currently, what I have been doing, for gnome-photos, is
> to copy-paste the *.c/*.h files from the gnome-documents tree.
>
> One downside of d
On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 15:57 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:48:20PM +0200, pec...@gmail.com wrote:
> > So please don't kill it. It's useful.
>
> Are you using it yes or no?
I agree with the sentiment expressed by the others in this thread;
although I don't use it consisten
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 18:30 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> I have closed the Bugzilla product "gnome-utils" for bug entry, and
> moved the product to the "Deprecated" classification.
>
> All fine now from my POV.
Thanks Andre, I think we can consider this completed.
Cosimo
_
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 17:34 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
> Iirc the fallback mode is using new gtk and stuff... why is it
> obsolete?
Is this another provocative question?
It's a fallback that *by definition* uses older technologies to have
something usable on hardware that do not support gnome-s
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 17:15 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
> Provocative question: is there any way that some unbiased survey would
> change the emphasis of development from gnome-shell to the fallback
> mode? And increase the configurability and so on.. Or - the current
> strategy is unchangeable
Hi,
as discussed in [1], I went ahead and completed the module split.
- the six modules have been split in separate git repos, with their
version bumped to 3.3.0
- new bugzilla products have been created for each of the modules, and
module maintainers have been set as administrators for the releva
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 12:59 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
> You probably already figured this out, but here's the commands that
> seemed to work for me:
>
> $ cd po/
> $ for po in *.po; do intltool-update ${po%.po}; done
> $ sed -i.bak '/#~/d' *.po
> $ for po in *.po; do intltool-update ${po%.po}; do
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 23:33 +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> Speaking of size of po-files. As we have already established, bringing
> translation over should be relatively easy, since by copying them over
> and updateing, the relevant translations will be kept and the rest will
> become obsolete
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 09:25 -0700, Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote:
> Tags in git need minimal space (which was different with subversion),
> and those could be useful in the future (ie. if you need to contact
> authors from x.y version to now).
I don't think this is really worth the hassle in this spec
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 18:03 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> Not sure if possible, but can you ensure the new git repositories aren't
> too big in size? E.g. try and purge stuff that doesn't belong.
Forgot to mention this in the previous mail, but I made sure the
repositories have no stale old stuff
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 17:04 -0400, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
> If there are no objections to this, I will try to setup the git magic
> needed to filter out the submodules from the repository without losing
> history and proceed to do the split soon after 3.2 is released.
> Thoughts?
Hi ag
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 19:51 -0700, Dennis Cranston (Yahoo!) wrote:
> Hi Cosimo,
>
> With the resources available to help on gnome-utils, it seems
> easier to continue releasing one tarball. Otherwise, we need to
> determine who will step up and handle releases of the disk
> usage analyzer, gnom
Hi,
I was discussing with Emmanuele the possibility to split the gnome-utils
repository into a separate set of repositories, one for each submodule
contained in gnome-utils (that is: baobab, font-viewer,
gnome-dictionary, gnome-screenshot, gnome-search-tool and
gnome-system-log).
Reasons for this
Hi Federico,
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:26 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> With the inclusion of gnome-documents, we are validating Tracker as
> *the* metadata store for Gnome.
Kind of yeah; Tracker is pretty much an unique technology in the
platform though and I don't see many alternatives
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 17:07 +0200, Xavier Claessens wrote:
> Hello ddl,
>
> Looks like it is time to start flames on ddl, so let's start a new one:
>
> W-T-F is that ctr-del to move a file to trash in nautilus?? And
> there is not even an indication why pressing del does nothing!
>
> To add
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 16:36 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I'll note that sushi should be using the normal (non-dark) variant of
> the theme when playing audio though. I'm sure the jury is still out on
> whether it should use the dark variant for office type documents.
Could you expand on why you
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:42 +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
> On 16 May 2011, at 12:18, Luca Ferretti wrote:
>
> > Also, what about content handler/previewer? I remember this similar
> > feature on mac os provides a dedicated API and policy allowing third
> > parties to provide their own "previewers" (
Hi Olav,
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:44 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> - what would the UI be in Nautilus? (default action vs preview)
Right now it's activated with Spacebar.
Sushi would never be a default action, but it has to be explicitly
triggered (show me the preview vs. open this file).
I also
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 11:39 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 21:50 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> >
> > 1. Evince is supposed to be a generic document viewer. Is there any
> > overlap with Sushi?
>
> I would guess that Sushi should use evince libraries to implement
> viewing fo
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 01:06 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> Other places where file previews could be useful are the future
> gnome-shell "desktop" (not sure what's current design/label for
> planned place holding recent and pinned stuff) and file chooser
> (only open or save too?). Also some specif
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 02:59 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> Yes, but you (as user) are not forced to install all existing GNOME
> related packages in your repositories, neither distros will install them
> in your stead :)
Why would you want tweak something you don't use? The day you want to
enable
Hi everyone,
It's too late for feature proposal, but I've been encouraged to post
this here anyway.
Sushi [1] is a quick previewer application, targeting integration with
file managers such as Nautilus - you can read more about it in a blog
post I wrote some time ago [2], but it works in a simila
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 23:41 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> If you have no time to commit, I'll be glad to help you, just ask on irc
> (elle.uca) or reply here.
Feel free to push the gnome-utils bits to master. I'll try to roll a new
tarball for tomorrow's RC.
Thanks,
Cosimo
Hi Lucas,
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 15:52 +, Lucas Rocha wrote:
> - tracker's nautilus extension doesn't build
>
> tracker-tags-extension.c: In function
> 'tracker_tags_extension_menu_provider_iface_init':
> tracker-tags-extension.c:249: error: 'NautilusMenuProviderIface' has
> no member named '
Hi Vincent,
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 16:24 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to build GNMOE 2.91.4 from tarballs, and it's not
> looking good at all :-)
I've been fixing some of these modules this afternoon, here's an update.
> evince
> ==
> Needs at least the updated eggsm
Hi Diego,
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 11:19 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
> El mié, 15-12-2010 a las 11:06 -0500, Matthias Clasen escribió:
> > epiphany (seems to have problems with the latest webkit)
>
> - bxlug-sid: webkitgtk there is not recent enough I guess.
>
> - cosimoc-deb-i686: doesn't
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 17:34 +0100, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Instead it would be great if the buildbot would automatically send a
> message to the commiter when the build fails (after the build was
> successful before). The committer can then decide if it is his fault or
> if he needs to ping the b
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 13:56 +0100, Jon Kristensen wrote:
> Now, I would like to make some kind of "binding" so that GNOME and other
> free desktop environments can browse the contents of a Pontarius server
> (so that you can see your and your friends media). Do you have any
> advice on where I
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 22:33 +0100, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> There is a lot of code which is copy-pasted around our desktop. For
> example, the GsdOsdWindow class, used by gnome-settings-daemon and
> gnome-power-manager, had to be updated several times because of Gtk
> breakages.
> Another piece
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 07:27 -0600, Cody Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 09:20 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> > > If there ends up being a bug report about this, please share the bug
> > > number. And hopefully we can get some usability nerds involved in
> > > this decision.
> >
> > I agree w
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 10:07 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> - GConf (and GSettings) are not used to store "important" things like
> emails, bookmarks, contacts, cookies, passwords, ...
I wouldn't be this sure; passwords usually aren't stored there, but e.g.
mail accounts could be stored there,
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 10:00 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 13:57 +0200, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
> > I think having GSettings merged in GLib is the blocker here for starting
> > ports of application to the new infrastructure, as it happened with GIO.
> >
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 12:41 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> This is nice, but only one app has been ported. Could a few apps be
> ported before people make a decision? Porting something like Evolution
> would be a nice fire test for Dconf...
I think having GSettings merged in GLib is the blocker h
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 16:00 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm proposing the universally shipped nautilus-sendto for inclusion into
> GNOME.
A big +1 from me.
Could it be possible to extend it and provide the same send-to options
to file items (recently used file, search results, ...) i
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 12:50 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
> >
> >
> >If you have any questions about the upgrade in general, feel free to
> > respond on desktop-devel-list.
> >
> Maybe a good idea to tell everyone which features have not been ported
> yet. Otherwise you get a lot of mails
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 21:40 -0700, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> You should find the new server to be faster for every operation than
> the old server. If you spot any performance problems, please report them
> by sending me an email.
Hi,
when clicking on any field in the "Patch Status" s
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 19:49 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
> Why don't we remove gst-mixer, vu-meter, gnome-cd and cddb-slave2
> completely from gnome media 2.27. People that want to keep on building
> them can use the 2.26 branch
Not sure if somebody still uses gst-mixer (at least Fedora is using
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 11:46 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> Duplication is certainly bad. We have two ways to go:
>
> A) Not put the maintainers list in the DOAP files and have them in
> the MAINTAINERS file. The plan is that Pulse will be able to take
> the .doap files from the module and
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 14:38 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> While this is not really important (it only breaks the use case that
> you can copy a .desktop file out of the session-state/ directory and
> use it to start the client in the exact same state), it might be a
> good idea to sync the eggsm
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 14:30 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:41 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> > 2009/4/2 Ross Burton :
> > > On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:20 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > >> * Still to discuss: dconf vs gconf. This is not yet covered by
> > >> this
bug-buddy has been branched for 2.26, the branch name is "gnome-2-26".
Development will continue on trunk.
Ciao,
Cosimo
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 10:25 +0100, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> When I follow the link to the GARNOME page, it says that the version
> for the development version of gnome is still coming. Am i missing
> something.
GARNOME has seen no releases in the 2.25 cycle, see the thread at [1].
[1] http://mail
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 23:03 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> There is no way to find out who is actually using the Python (or whatever
> language) bindings for a given library. Some may have custom applications
> around, and just dropping support while the underlying library is not
> officially d
[re-sending to list, this time from the right email address]
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 22:27 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> - If a deprecated library is still shipped
> - then the language bindings for that deprecated library should also be
> shipped.
> - Else, if the deprecated library will no
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 12:00 -0500, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> Hi
>
> In GNOME 2.24 and up, BugBuddy no longer send the crash reports to
> Bugzilla. It send them to a misterious crash.gnome.org, and the URL
> returned by bugbuddy to the user leads to a 503 error.
>
> Example:
> http://crash.gnome.or
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 20:26 -0500, Neil wrote:
> The ideal, I think, would be if GNOME already had an engine/API that
> could be used for RSS content. I did read somewhere that WebKit could
> be the answer to this. Is that true? If not, would it be crazy to
> look at developing some kind of sim
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 12:01 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Sorry if it has been already discussed but, where can I find the
> original "New module decisions for 2.26" message. I can only find
> replies to it but I cannot find the main thread:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/desktop-devel-list@gnome.org/
Hi,
in the last month and a half I have been in my free time rewriting
almost from scratch the GNOME System Log viewer, which lives in the
gnome-utils package.
Today I merged by rewrite into gnome-utils trunk, so it will likely be
included in the 2.26 release.
New features include
* migration to
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 14:21 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> You don't need full symbols for crash information to be useful. It
> certainly helps, but we shouldn't let the perfect be the enemy of the
> good there.
Right, but I don't think there's an intermediate solution between
resolving the crash tra
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:56 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Cosimo Cecchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - patch review status
>
> Maybe time to investigate Review Board or the like?
I haven't tried that kind of programs, but
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 17:44 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> I am not sure what the timeframe is for every feature btw. The intention
> is to order them by need, and deliver in multiple stages. So some
> features might be missing for 6 months, some only for a month. Further,
> some might be available
Hi Olav,
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 17:00 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> For that the proposal is that the following is not part of the initial
> upgraded bgo:
> * The points system
> * index.cgi UI mods
> * Making a new favicon
> * The infomessages on show_bug.cgi
> * Layout modifications for atta
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 17:00 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> I'm more worried about the fact that there has been no release since
> early 2007 (if I'm not mistaken), and so distro are currently shipping
> it with patches. Maybe we can just import the module in GNOME svn and
> fix stuff there?
Yes, th
Hi everyone,
currently we have the GNOME_MAINTAINER_MODE_DEFINES macro in
gnome-common, which takes care of enabling the -D*_DISABLE_DEPRECATED
switches for libraries in the stack.
Given the new GLib/GTK+ single header policy, it would make sense to
also add the *_DISABLE_SINGLE_INCLUDES switch to
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 13:06 +0200, Fernando Herrera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Christian Persch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > However, glade-3 is still not working on all features in the gtkbuilder
> > format (e.g. nautilus' and gnome-terminal's .ui files break badly wh
Hi,
I am implementing a feature in bug-buddy which allows to log the
critical/fatal messages and post them to the bug report along with the
stacktrace for better debugging [1].
Right now the bug-buddy --include option (which I use to insert a temp
file containing the logged messages) pastes the co
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 17:48 +0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> Is it worth telling users of RHEL5, Debian Etch etc that they can't use the
> GNOME release because you want to use the with statement in your code? Is it
> really that difficult to write code without using it?
Why is Debian Etch compat a
Hi,
I just branched bug-buddy for gnome-2-22 to commit the port from
gnome-vfs to GIO and some other easy fixes.
Cheers,
--
Cosimo
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-li
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 13:00 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Has there been a webkit-1.0 release in the meantime?
>
> We started to use webkit for the GIMP help-browser in trunk, so I would
> very much welcome if webkit became a blessed external dependency for the
> GNOME platform. But I guess a stab
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 23:22 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> >From a quick search through the archives it seems that also PolicyKit,
> Clutter, ClutterMM, and libgda have been proposed as external
> dependencies but aren't listed in the wiki. Is that right?
WebKit/GTK+ also have been proposed as ext
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 22:04 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> Many years ago, someone enabled google to index bugzilla by modifying
> the robots file that keeps it out. It didnt work so well because the
> google spider trashed the site to hard. But now bugzilla is hosted on
> better hardware with mor
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 20:16 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> I find #10 particularily interesting; are developers really aware that
> so many users want that? is bugzilla enough to see such kind of
> things? is it really true that there are no resources to implement
> that?
>
> There's a bug repo
Il giorno dom, 10/02/2008 alle 21.38 +0100, Luca Ferretti ha scritto:
> It was planned (see this list archive) so I've just updated jhbuild and
> garnome. Not the wiki, 'cause it seems I've lost my password...
I felt free to update the wiki with the updated information.
--
Cosimo
smime.p7s
D
Il giorno mer, 23/01/2008 alle 12.17 +0100, Alexander Larsson ha
scritto:
> These are the major regressions in the nautilus stack, but there are
> also other uses of gnome-vfs in the desktop. Like the trash applet
> (being worked on i believe) and the panel menus. I don't know the status
> of thes
Il giorno mer, 16/01/2008 alle 20.23 -0700, Elijah Newren ha scritto:
> 2008/1/16 Wouter Bolsterlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2008-01-16 klockan 11:31 skrev Luca Ferretti:
> > > Changes in avahi:
> > > [snip]
> > > * i18n support - from 0.6.22 (well, by now there are no
> > > transla
Hi everyone,
yesterday I committed a patch for Epiphany which drops gnome-vfs
dependency and picks up the new gio API from glib 2.15.
Epiphany used GnomeVFSDNSSD to discover local network servers via
Zeroconf, and I replaced that code using the avahi-gobject binding,
available from version 0.6.22.
Il giorno dom, 06/01/2008 alle 23.47 +0100, Vincent Untz ha scritto:
> If you use anjuta, speak up. If you have tried anjuta, speak up. If the
> name anjuta makes you feel something, speak up. If you want to be the
> next big movie star, speak up. Now.
Hi, as a new contributor to the GNOME projec
80 matches
Mail list logo
