2010/2/19 Bastien Nocera
> On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 19:39 -0800, Gabriel Burt wrote:
> > I'm not exactly excited to enter a possible flame fest when I'm happy
> > doing my hacking and having users find me and tell me they like the
> > results. But, in case others agree GNOME could benefit from this
ons, 14 02 2007 kl. 11:02 +, skrev Ross Burton:
> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 10:44 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> > there was a proposal for the "desktop places" on the wiki:
> >
> > http://live.gnome.org/DesktopPlaces
> >
> > which is entirely doable now that we have an API to access local
> >
necessary
> layer of separation.
>
> Down with control centre.
>
> I want my menus back. Changing settings just isn't the quick
> in-and-out-in-5-seconds-flat job it used to be.
I agree 100%, I like the idea but the current implementation is
extremely slow and it seems pointl
ons, 10 01 2007 kl. 10:36 +0530, skrev Ritesh Khadgaray:
> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 20:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > Grab some high-up redhat, suse, ubuntu distro people and ask them why
> > they ship beagle by default and not tracker. If you can come up with a
> > convincing argument, and one o
word is entered, if we hit above say
90% known in one dictionary then it's probably that language. A good
guess is easy to make and will often be correct. Naturally this solution
is far from perfect but it should give us a good indication within the
first sentence or so. Or am I just spouti
allel or whichever solution we need then we
absolutely need to do it.
- David Nielsen
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
tir, 22 08 2006 kl. 17:53 -0300, skrev theblues gnr:
> I don't think an usability test has ever been done with the current layout.
> At least I never heard of one.
BetterDesktop seems to have done this, slab is part of the result of
those tests.
- Da
o away would not be the best possible
approach. I think it should continue to work as always, a vendor has to
take active steps to reenable a given application with the knowledge
that it will go away after a given date and as such can take the steps
they see fit to either move over to the new appli
gs and many other things.
The whole preferences submenu has always seemed like a mess to me
honestly, I would love to see it structured better. It has a feel of
having had an item added everytime we got a new feature from somewhere
rather than having followed the GNOME way a
ons, 26 07 2006 kl. 17:47 -0700, skrev Jeff Waugh:
>
>
> > The GNOME Utilities package is a small package that GNOME has kept since
> > the 1.x era (and before); it provides some application other than baobab,
> > like the screenshoter, the file search dialog, the dictionary and the
> > system lo
man, 24 07 2006 kl. 19:45 -0500, skrev Shaun McCance:
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 02:02 +0200, David Nielsen wrote:
> > man, 24 07 2006 kl. 22:58 +0100, skrev Alan Horkan:
> > > APIs get deprecated, but applications get removed entirely.
> > > Sometimes the option to kee
fatal thing back
on again for development, it seemed to hit bugs left and right, great
testing feature for those of us who have the strange hobby of filing
bugs.
I apologize for any stop energy I might have released accidentally.
- David Nielsen
http://osnews.com/story.php?news_id=15266
__
man, 24 07 2006 kl. 19:49 +0100, skrev Jamie McCracken:
> I dont doubt that but FWIW when it comes to adding Tracker to gnome
> 2.18, I would like notes to be added as a first class object and stored
> in Tracker's DB. Tracker already makes it easy to add tagging,
> extensible metadata and link
less
time, gstreamer 0.10 adaption has taken surprisingly short time, I
believe out of all the application I use only Thoggen has yet to be
ported. The same should happen with the bindings.
So long as we don't break things for the user it should matter much
while the change happens. Parallel in
man, 24 07 2006 kl. 12:51 +0100, skrev Calum Benson:
> On 22 Jul 2006, at 12:50, David Nielsen wrote:
>
> > Sticky Notes tends to get cluttered up for note taking while project
> > managing, it's an all or nothing interface whereas Tomboy allows me to
> > show o
ctName=IronPython&SearchText=mono
>
There's also the very pythonish Boo language for which MonoDevelop has a
plugin.
- David Nielsen
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
lør, 22 07 2006 kl. 12:08 +0100, skrev Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro:
> Sáb, 2006-07-22 às 00:10 +0200, David Nielsen escreveu:
> > lør, 22 07 2006 kl. 02:33 +1000, skrev Jeff Waugh:
> > >
> > >
> > > > * Should we include Tomboy in the Desktop suite? (compl
fre, 21 07 2006 kl. 17:57 -0500, skrev Shaun McCance:
> On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 00:10 +0200, David Nielsen wrote:
> > lør, 22 07 2006 kl. 02:33 +1000, skrev Jeff Waugh:
> > > * If Alex wants to adopt the GNOME release cycle and strategy for Tomboy,
> > >that's *f
. The less we set in stone in
terms of solutions, provided we spec out and provide functionality to
solve them, the more likely it is that the distros will converge on a
set of applications that will win out on excellence for the use cases
the distro selects, but everyone is equally able to hook in and replace
a given application.
-David Nielsen
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
ither or not I will be allowed the freedom to develop for my desktop
of choice in my language of choice I'll go on a puppy killing spree.
The point being the issue goes both ways, if we keep Mono as the bastard
child of the platform a lot of upcoming developers will get tired of
waiting and se
els team, I'm sure they'll optimize the crap
out that sucker if we hit serious problems providing GNOME using Mono.
- David Nielsen
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
ould be extremely nice, currently GNOME
ships with several applications which use different systems to present a
spell checking interface to the user.
Spell checking in GNOME makes puppies cry... please think of the
puppies.
- David Nielsen
___
desktop-devel-lis
OME because you hate Windows and not because you love GNOME maybe
you should reconsider your reasoning. GNOME is a fantastic desktop, I
love it dearly, I wouldn't feel at home in another desktop but I want it
to move forward and I want it to live after the current generation of
developers move on. We simply won't do that on C.
- David Nielsen
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
ildren for breakfast but we
aren't debating beagle for inclusion.. yet, by the time we will being
having that debate, naturally it would prudent to examine if it still
displays grotesk ressource abuse and if we can fix it. We are
specifically talking about Tomboy this time around.
i tools become more viable solutions for my workload.
I would personally love to see photo and music management tools in the
desktop, it's one of the things I see users around me spend a lot of
time working with. Especially as good digital
parison Tomboy after running for days
sits at 40 megs (it was 25 megs earlier so I suspect it might be
leaking).
Tomboy is a fantastic application, after discovering it I quite
literally changed the way I work - keeping it out of the desktop because
of ressource consumption concerns that can be fixe
26 matches
Mail list logo
