Here is a feature proposal to add support for Exchange accounts in Online
Accounts (or GOA): https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointFive/Features/GoaExchange
Online Accounts (in Git master) has been taught how to handle Exchange accounts
using Exchange Web Services [1]. This means that a user can go to
Hello everybody!
Around 10 days ago I started implementing Photos as laid out in these designs:
https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Photos
The Git tree is at: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-photos
Currently the application does not do much other than showing a blank window,
but most of the und
The newly designed (or redesigned) GNOME 3 applications have some
common UI elements. For example, if you look at the following designs,
you will notice that the main toolbar, "selection" toolbar, main icon
view, etc. are quite similar: +
https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Boxes +
https://live.gnom
>> The newly designed (or redesigned) GNOME 3 applications have some
>> common UI elements. For example, if you look at the following designs,
>> you will notice that the main toolbar, "selection" toolbar, main icon
>> view, etc. are quite similar:
>
> Sorry for being so naive but why couldn't thi
> hello from Yorba, makers of Shotwell.
Hi, Adam! We met in Berlin at the Collabora party during the Desktop Summit.
You probably remember me as one of the authors of Solang.
For those who don't know Solang (http://git.gnome.org/browse/solang)
was a photo manager that I wrote during the dying day
Hello everybody,
I have been working on a GLib/GObject wrapper for the Skydrive and Hotmail
APIs: https://www.gitorious.org/libzapojit
At the moment its dependencies include json-glib-1.0, rest-0.7, libsoup-2.4
and goa-1.0. If required, goa-1.0 can be made optional.
I would like to move it to GN
> I would like to move it to GNOME infrastructure and make a release in time
> for 3.5.2
Done. The first release, version 0.0.1 is available from:
http://download.gnome.org/sources/libzapojit/0.0/
Happy hacking,
Debarshi
--
K&R is like the Bible. The fervent read it from end to end, the religi
> Hey Debarshi, just a few more questions, so we can sort this new
> dependency properly:
>
> - Does it have any dependencies besides glib ? libsoup, librest ?
Apart from those 3, it uses json-glib for dealing with the JSON sent by the
server, and gnome-online-accounts for the OAuth2 tokens for W
> ===
> GNOME-CONTROL-CENTER
> ===
> gnome-online-accounts shows "No online accounts configured" when there
> are online accounts configured
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682175
> Initial patch that needs more work
I am looking into it.
Cheer
> I'm also under the impression that there are a lot of support
> for LibreOffice in the Gnome community, and I was told that "Documents" has
> a dependency on it (causing Documents not to be included in the Gnome
> Ubuntu flavor).
Interesting. Documents, as a core app, is much more fundamental to
Why is the 3.7.1 release before the Release Team meets to discuss the feature
proposals? I am assuming that the meeting is meant to decide whether or not to
accept a feature.
Happy hacking,
Debarshi
--
http://i.imgur.com/Z7jjX.jpg
pgpqU9EQ7qBRC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
> What I ask for is a place for user support of File Roller.
> Do you have one?
#gnome-hackers on GIMPNet
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
http://i.imgur.com/Z7jjX.jpg
pgpkMunqMrJ3K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel
> Do you accept questions like "I cannot open RAR on Fedora".
> I do know the answer.
> But that's the kind of user support question I mean.
Yes, we do accept such questions. :-)
Cheers,
Debarshi
pgpM9N5SnKJrv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
desktop
>>> No "gnome-online-account", "zapojit", "libgdata" appear.
>>> I thought that I would find these in platform overview since they are
>>> both part of the core gnome user experience and documented API.
>
> [...]
>
> To the original question: we have always had the problem of deciding
> what goes
> It won't go in the Settings.
Why not? Why was the "forced fallback" in Settings instead of the Tweak Tool
in the first place?
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
There are two hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation, naming
things and off-by-one errors.
pgpraCqiskS4Y.pgp
Description: PGP sign
> The decision is all nice and well. however this will force people that don't
> have the latest and greatest accelerated hardware to switch to something
> else. most PCs that are more that 2 years old are probably out of the game.
I am typing this from a five and a half years old Macbook running
> So you want to keep of track all useful engines? What's good for that?
Yes.
The good thing is that users, who are not familiar with all the
politics of free software input method frameworks and engines, get to
choose from a list of good quality engines. They do not have to go
searching all over
> No, you are making things even worse.
> [...]
> (They are
> likely to try so because current engines are virtually all inferior to
> those found in closed-source system)
> BTW, on Redmond OS or Mac OS X, if you Google/Baidu for input methods,
> most of them would just work.
So why not fix and im
> The thing for Chinese input method is: Few of them are doing a good job.
> Styling of Chinese, dialect, modern Chinese cultures idioms *varies*.
> Even the big commercial input method failed to achieve a good job on
> every aspect mentioned above. That's why you saw several of commercial
> in
> TL;DR: It's 2012. The compiler understands UTF-8 and defaults to it.
> Use it :)
As I discovered recently, gjs does not like Unicode characters in string
literals.
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
There are two hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation, naming
things and off-by-one errors.
>> You are likely referring to:
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680730
Actually I was referring to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689601
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
There are two hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation, naming
things and off-by-one errors.
pgpN
> Most of it isn't actually. I'm pretty certain that most of the popular
> protocols are implemented directly in telepathy.
By popular if you mean SIP, XMPP (including link-local) and IRC, then yes.
The long list of fringe and locale specific protocols still come from
libpurple.
Cheers,
Debarshi
>
> GNOME-DOCUMENTS
>
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686527 Pickup ownCloud
> accounts from GOA
> OwnCloud feature completion - I'll drop this is a simple patch doesn't
> appear before
>> This touches a general unsolved issue: Sharing the maintenance burden of
>> deprecated modules across distributors who ship enterprise / long-term
>> support versions. Same problem e.g. for gnome-vfs, libgnome, ...
>> I guess if somebody offered maintainership, nobody would refuse.
>
> It's all
I would like to propose the following feature for 3.10:
Integrate Zimbra in GNOME
https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointNine/Features/Zimbra
We already have most of the pieces of the puzzle (IMAP/SMTP, CalDAV, CardDAV)
in place, so it is a matter of tying them up together and letting users have
Hey,
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:07:23PM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> Anyway this is really not what was the most important point to me in
> my previous email and you didn't answer the question I really cared
> about, so I'm asking again: is there a way for maintainers to opt out
> of the githu
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:07:23PM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> > We should pick our fights, on the other hand, GitHub has released more
> > open source code and tools than the gitorious community. We accept
> > money from Google for the
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:38:00PM +0200, Luis Menina wrote:
> >> I agree that everyone should be free to pick their fights. I agree
> >> that you you are free to pick yours and have them different from mine.
> >> Do you agree that mine can be different from yours?
> >
> > And, yet, you use GMail.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 04:50:14PM +0200, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
> those services have the same problems of github, and free alternatives
> do exist.
So, for starters ...
- What is the free alternative to Google Hangouts?
- What is the free alternative to Twitter with the same user base?
This
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:48:11AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:15:32AM +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
>> 2. many other scripts are relying on matching the exact
>> repository-name.
>
> Which ones? No script that I am aware of uses this to figure out the
> repository name. I
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:34:49PM +0300, Ionut Biru wrote:
> How often do you use this functionality in your daily use of gnome?
> please answer honestly and I want a straight answer, don't give me a
> marketing answer.
I do regularly mix middle click copy / paste with ctrl+c/v copy / paste.
Ch
Hello everybody,
I would like to propose these two features for GNOME 3.12:
- https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointEleven/Features/FacebookPhotos
- https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointEleven/Features/WindowLiveMail
In short, you would be able to see your Facebook photos in Photos, and
use your Windows L
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 01:46:27PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 12:22 +0000, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>>
>> - https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointEleven/Features/WindowLiveMail
>>
>> In short, you would be able to ... use your Windows Live (outlook.co
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 01:13:55PM +0300, p10 wrote:
> I just transitioned from Thunderbird to Evolution + GNOME online
> accounts and found out there's one big drawback (at least for me it's
> very annoying) - autologin doesn't unlock the keyring .
Stef had some ideas:
http://www.superlectures.co
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 03:53:06PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> Needs global coordination, and should have been discussed here. The
> jhbuild moduleset for 3.12 is still on 0.16. So is the Continuous
> manifest. I'm looking at switching to master now, but: are the Tracker
> maintainers on board
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:32:23AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Terminal and Evince purposefully do not have Quit in the app menu for
> this reason
gnome-terminal Git master does have a Quit in the app menu that only
closes the current window.
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
Wearing non-prescription g
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:55:08AM +0100, Daniel Mustieles Garc?a wrote:
> gnome-online-accounts
Sure, go ahead.
Thanks,
Debarshi
--
Wearing non-prescription glasses and embracing obscurity doesn't
necessarily make you a hipster. -- Anonymous
pgphNaS0sF5VU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 03:21:06PM +, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
> wrote:
> >
> > What was the issue that happened in Fedora package review? Why
> > doesn't it apply to our copylibs right now, or e.g. libgd?
> >
> I think no one noticed libgd.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:16:12PM +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> But we could have the inverse relation too: libmediaart could use Grilo
> to fetch the thumbnails from webservices, and then download it and
> stores in local disk following the spec. Grilo would only provide the
> URL (using,
I would like to propose this one:
* 724306 gnome-documents: Recent GTK+ does not like it when the titlebar is
reset on a realized window
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
Wearing non-prescription glasses and embracing obscurity doesn't
necessarily make you a hipster. -- Anonymous
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 05:00:02PM +0100, Vadim Rutkovsky wrote:
>> Moreover, we can copy some of the test-data into homedir and then
>> clean it up after tests complete. Continous do not have any problems
>> with that but then running 'make check' on users local machine would
>> break the user's h
> I am on fedora rawhide with GS 3.11.90. I noticed that while searching in
> overview I am not able to reach the application by its original name.
>
> Searching for 'Fil.." would give me Files but not if I search for "Nautilus"
It is a bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725023
Happ
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:22:49AM +0100, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
> I think at least Nautilus creates a "Wallpapers" subdirectory when you
> right-click on an image and select to set it as a background. Which I
> find a very good idea, since I like having backgrounds separated
> e.g. from my holid
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 06:32:47PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> == gnome-control-center ==
>
> background: thumbnails are tiny in 3.13.3
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732375
> Debarshi and Bastien discussed; might be fixed already
> but there is one patch left in "accepted-c
Hey,
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 02:46:25PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> And it obviously also depends on the gnome-documents maintainers being
> happy with the path taken, of reusing a majority of gnome-documents'
> codebase to avoid duplication.
Yes, I like the idea of reusing a majority of the-d
Hey,
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:42:45PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> == gnome-online-accounts ==
>
> Google Online Account Password Unexpectedly Fails
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734298
I think this is a duplicate of this evolution-data-server bug that
was a fallout from some
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 03:42:17PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> gnome-photos: g_str_hash(): gnome-photos killed by SIGSEGV
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735746
> Stacktrace available but no further investigation yet.
I have attached a fix. I will wait a bit for the Tracker folk
You could get the best of both worlds by doing what gnome-documents
does (ie. use an inactivity-timeout):
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-documents/tree/src/application.js#n133
That way, your process does not linger for ever, but it stays around
long enough to cache a quick series of searches.
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:47:37AM +, Philip Withnall wrote:
> I guess there are two approaches: making async APIs easier to use; and
> discouraging use of sync ones. I think the GAsyncResult framework we?ve
> got is pretty good, and I can?t think of a way to simplify it.
One convention that I
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 06:52:13AM -0500, Ondrej Holy wrote:
> We already have g_file_read_async, it was probably typo, however
> I wonder which methods doesn't have async versions? Would be probably
> good start to implemented them if there are any.
I meant that currently:
- g_file_read_async i
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 11:14:46AM +, Philip Withnall wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 10:57 +0000, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > One convention that I like is to use a _sync suffix for sync APIs,
> > instead of an _async suffix for async ones, because it lets me spot
> > synchr
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 12:53:46PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> hi;
>
> On 9 February 2015 at 12:40, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 11:14:46AM +, Philip Withnall wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 10:57 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> >> >
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 05:34:24PM +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Blocker bugs are listed on your product's overview page:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=browse.html
>
> [...]
>
> === gnome-documents ==
>
> List view looks messy
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723843
>
> [.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 07:04:20PM +0300, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> checking for NONE/share/dbus-1/interfaces/org.gnome.ShellSe
> archProvider2.xml... no
> configure: error: gnome-shell search provider requested but
> interface definition file not found
>
Assuming that you have gnome-shell instal
Hey,
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 08:49:02PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I tried to build gnome-photos today and noticed it is broken in jhbuild
> on Fedora.
:(
> gnome-photos depends on dleyna-renderer, which in jhbuild is
> provided by pkgconfig(dleyna-renderer-service-1.0), but this .pc file
Hey,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 03:30:29PM +0530, Pranav Kant wrote:
> Here[1] is the list that Sahil has compiled for GNOME projects on which
> Mozilla directly or indirectly relies on
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/12NyQXCnnyO61vqHB8VyYqtcN4xxfY0L8NELjfPrYRAA/edit
As was already pointe
Hey,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 04:39:23PM +, Patrick Welche wrote:
> There is a rather good pull request waiting for me at
>
> https://github.com/GNOME/dasher/pull/2
>
> I was under the impression though that github is one way - if I apply
> it on github, will it make its way back to
Hey,
[Removed a few mailing lists from CC]
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 02:49:34PM -0800, Christian Hergert wrote:
> * Remote video? (assuming participants are comfortable with that)
We did run a live stream on Google Hangouts during the first day of
the Content Apps Hackfest in Madrid. Instead of m
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:57:35PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> It is easy to do streaming with free software, in a way that lets
> everyone watch with free software,
Incorrect. It is possible, but it is not easy...
> and I know people who would be glad
> to help you do this.
... and this is
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:33:47PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Piotr Dr?g wrote:
> > I really love the shortcut windows that you are introducing this
> > cycle, but I'm concern about translation. I would like to add a
> > requirement to the GNOME Goal that ever
Hey,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:11:16PM +0530, Sukant Kumar wrote:
> i have gone through the ideas page of gnome and i am interested in
> *photos:upload to google photos project*
Did you not receive my response to your earlier email?
Welcome to GNOME!
Cheers,
Rishi
pgpibub3WqBCd.pgp
Descriptio
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:44:24AM -0500, Stephen Adler wrote:
> Any idea of how gdm ended up doing this to my video settings in vmware?
> Is this a gnome bug? a fedora bug? a vmware bug?
>
> Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Filing a bug at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gdm
a
Hello everybody,
GNOME 3.20 was a busy cycle for Photos, with a lot of activity
from new contributors, and we want to carry that momentum into
3.22. While we have a roadmap [1] to list the priority bugs
and features for the near future, I want to draw your attention
to two big things that we want
Hey,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:17:04AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> No. I used to do this, but stopped a couple years ago because it was
> pointless. Nobody should trust my key, so why use it?
Why shouldn't anybody trust my key if it has been signed by other
members of the community?
By th
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:07:13AM +0100, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> Agreed. I thought one of the arguments in favour of keeping Telepathy
> around was the support for some ???uncommon??? protocols that are not
> really supported elsewhere though? [0]
>
> [snip]
>
> [0] One possible answer would may
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:42:18PM +0100, Adrien Plazas via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> To be sure, gnome-2-22 in the wiki page is a typo and you meant
> gnome-3-22, right?
Based on that assumption, I took the liberty to edit the Wiki to
mention "gnome-3-22", and not "gnome-2-22".
__
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:44:16AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> So far, we have this gnome-nightly-apps repository which contains copies of
> the flatpak manifests for a bunch of gnome apps. That is redundant and
> suboptimal. Recently, flatpak has gained the ability to find manifests in
> git r
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 05:56:25PM -0500, Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> I'm missing some rooms though, like #nautilus or #gnome-photos etc
Nitpick: it is just #photos.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
htt
Hey,
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 01:08:24PM +0800, xiaofeng wrote:
> When I use the "Select All" action, the next step is always being "Copy",
> what about your next step? If that's the most case, what about to add an
> action to bind "Select All" and "Copy"?
I am quite used to doing ctrl+a ctrl+c to
Hey,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:55:15AM +, jfle...@kwain.net wrote:
> - Libpillowfight (image processing):
> https://github.com/openpaperwork/libpillowfight
>
> In the long term, I will try to replace them by developing alternatives
> based on GObject Introspection.
For what it is worth, GE
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 01:29:09PM +0100, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> * Some modules clone git:// submodules. Please be on the lookout for
> these. For example, this is .gitmodules in gnome-online-accounts:
>
> # Bad
> [submodule "telepathy-account-widgets"]
> path = telepathy-account-widgets
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:32:42PM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> Before committing to tons more search providers, I'd like to see a bug
> and some development effort dedicated to make the providers we already
> ship more efficient.
As for a bug, there is:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?
Hello everybody,
As we start the 3.27.x / 3.28 development cycle with this week's
3.27.1 release, I'd like to notify you that I want to remove the
Telepathy integration from GNOME Online Accounts in another 6 months
starting from 3.29.1. Stated differently, when GNOME 3.30 gets
released in the aut
Hello everybody,
It's been a month since GNOME Documents was removed from the set of
core utilities by the release team. See:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta/merge_requests/157
We are currently in the 3.31.x / 3.32 development cycle. Once the
GNOME 3.32 release is done, starting f
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:38:50AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Similarly, Todoist support was dropped from GOA 3.32.
>
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-online-accounts/commit/bf77325d8
>
> The commit message has a few mistakes: the Recipes app does not yet
> have its own Todoist support.
Hey,
I hadn't expected this to garner so much interest!
Instead of replying to each message separately, I'll try to summarize
a few things into this message.
First of all, this thread doesn't have anything to do with GNOME
Books. It's a separate application and doesn't have any Online
Accounts i
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 02:49:55PM +, Emmanuele Bassi via
desktop-devel-list wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 14:21, Allan Day wrote:
> > If apps could provide their own keys that would certainly change the
> > picture (I didn't actually know it was a possibility.) It would also
> > change the
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 04:03:41PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 14:33 +, Allan Day wrote:
> > That's not what's happening here. Until very recently, Debarshi was
> > the Documents maintainer, and he's obviously been fully involved.
>
> It is what is happening in GNOME O
entities. As if an active
community of contributors have been jeopardized by the arbitrary will
of the mythical GOA maintainer.
That's false.
[rishi@kolache gnome-documents]$ git shortlog -ns | head
1036 Cosimo Cecchi
357 Debarshi Ray
78 Alessandro Bono
76 Daniel Mustieles
68 Piot
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 08:02:16PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 18:52 +0000, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > Grep for "Future of Pocket in GNOME" from 24th August 2018 in your
> > inbox.
>
> Which solves what? You're removing the Documents an
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 01:38:57PM +1100, Michael Gratton wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan, 2019 at 5:52 AM, Debarshi Ray
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 04:03:41PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 14:33 +, Allan Day wrote: > That's not
>
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:00:58AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I don't think that feature requests should be treated on the same level
> as existing, merged, features
I can't change my theme, I can't change my fonts, no minimize button,
no wallpaper options, my laptop insists on suspending ...
Hey Emmanuele,
(I am summarizing a few other sub-threads here.)
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 06:45:50PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 18:36, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > What isn't possible is to mix and match API keys with account types at
> > run-time. That
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:56:49AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> You dropped maintainership of gnome-documents, we're now dropping it
> from core GNOME, and by removing the Documents integration from GOA,
> you're crippling the application, whoever the new maintainer ends up
> being.
No, wrong.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 02:03:18PM +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> It's true that GNOME Documents was conceived as a way to seamlessly
> access all files local and remote. In that sense, the Online Accounts
> integration is crucial for it.
>
> However, it has turned out to be m
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 11:24:00AM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote:
> 2. It's not possible to discontinue support for services X, Y, and Z from
> GOA, and yank the rug out from under apps that expected (even if that
> expectation was wrong) it to be part of a stable platform.
You mean like
TL;DR:
I don't think Deja Dup has anything to worry about. I was pleasantly
surprised to know that Deja Dup even uses GOA. Having backups
integrated more closely in the OS seems like a good thing to me. I'd
encourage you to bring up the story of backups with the GNOME Design
Team.
On Sun, Jan 27,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 02:48:12PM -0500, Michael Terry wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, at 21:39, Michael Gratton wrote:
> > If GOA Mail is going to be removed from Fedora can there at least be a
> > method to programatically determine what is supported and what isn't,
> > so Geary can avoid launc
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 11:37:31AM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 09:24, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:00:58AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > I don't think that feature requests should be treated on the same level
Jeremy,
You already attempted to slander me once before in this thread:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-January/msg00027.html
It's been one week since I produced evidence against that:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-January/msg00035.html
You had e
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 01:29:54PM +, Matthew Paul Thomas via
desktop-devel-list wrote:
> * For some reason that isn???t clear to me, GOA cares what you use each
> account for, rather than merely recording which apps the user has
> granted access to each account.
Because that's how
Hey Michael,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 08:29:32PM -0500, Michael Terry wrote:
> I meant (1) keeping GNOME's API key valid, (2) maintaining
> libgdata, (3) maintaining the GVFS google backend (which only
> supports using GOA keys -- an app can't give it its own keys),
> and (4) maintaining the GOA go
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 09:26:05PM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:04 PM Debarshi Ray wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 11:24:00AM -0800, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > 2. It's not possible to discontinue support for
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 12:13:26PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> Again, not a huge deal; sure, Documents is actually useful to navigate
> through the Google Drive contents???the Drive web UX has become shockingly
> bad over the years, unsurprisingly since its a fate that befalls every
> Google ap
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 12:33:09PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> Bug trackers are an awful metric, with a clear and demonstrable bias.
For an application that regularly released in an utterly broken state,
a bug tracker is a decent indication.
> Nevertheless, as I said: I don't *care* about Doc
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 05:14:39AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> This feels like an awfully aggressive way of asking for a reply in a
> heated thread that's already getting close to 100 emails. I don't know
> if replying will help but since you seem to want a reply so badly and
> because I do want t
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:21:01AM -0500, Christopher Davis wrote:
> As asked on the fedora issue, will this mean that cloud documents will
> no longer be available within the app?
If you want to keep the online accounts integration alive in Documents
then you'd need to do something like this whi
Hey Michael,
Sorry, I have been a bit behind with email.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 01:12:29AM +1100, Michael Gratton wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb, 2019 at 4:58 AM, Michael Terry wrote:
> > Thank you for the clarification! As someone that had been confused
> > about the intent and ended up relying on G
98 matches
Mail list logo