On 9/22/05, Ali Sobhi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems like the list gnome-build-status is not active (last posting June
2005). So I'm posting this note to this list.
gnome-love would be a better list to try on.
I've been trying to build Gnome 2.12 using jhbuild on a Fedora Core 4.
Are you
On 9/13/05, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it's time to hammer out a schedule for the 2.14 release
So, we've just had some clarifications and an additional request so
far...no other complaints? Is this schedule fine? Hurry and speak up
if it's
Sorry for the slow response...
On 9/14/05, Danilo Šegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today at 7:42, Elijah Newren wrote:
The specific solutions I'm proposing are:
- Tarballs are due by 23:59 UTC on the Monday specified
Can we also add a general guideline as to *earliest* when tarballs
So, it's time to hammer out a schedule for the 2.14 release (and 2.12
point releases) and cover a couple closely related issues. I've put
together a preliminary schedule, based on moving the 2.11 schedule
forward 6 months (with a slight change).
There are some specific issues I'd like to
On 9/11/05, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't exist. I think a metacity-list would be really really
useful. Pretty please? :)
As Havoc, said, I think the big question is finding out what problems
this would address or what new advantages it would bring. I believe
there may be
On 9/11/05, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there are topics that really need a list, they are on topic for
desktop-devel-list, usability list, and other gnome lists. I don't think
we need a metacity list until the metacity-specific content becomes a
significant amount of traffic
On 9/10/05, Jaap Haitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Currently most of the applications which are part of the gnome-desktop
are the same 2.12 however some apps like evolution, totem, gnome-volume
manager, epiphany (and maybe a couple more) have different version numbers.
Wouldn't it be
On 8/17/05, Carlos Garcia Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies, I broke the string freeze in this evince commit:
http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/evince/ps/ps-document.c?r1=1.55r2=1.56
I wanted to commit ASAP because of the evince release and I forgot that
it changed some strings.
On 8/14/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't make any sense to me, really. The code looks fine and
compiles
without any warnings or errors here ...
Can I see the full log?
snip
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
CCing d-d-l in case this gets stuck in the moderation queue on
devel-announce like last time. ;-)
Tarballs are due tomorrow (August 8th) at 23:59 UTC for the GNOME
2.11.91 Development release, which will be delivered on Wednesday.
With this release, we enter string freeze.
For the full
On 8/2/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Murray,
Firstly, I don't think we could even consider getting this draconian
about interface documentation until all the *existing* interfaces are
documented. If a whole library was pretty much undocumented, it'd be
bizarre to
On 8/1/05, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's what I need now:
1) The Clearlooks Metacity theme needs to be landed into CVS
in gnome-themes. Any number of people have provided patches
for this, including me.
2) A Clearlooks desktop theme needs to be landed into CVS
in
On 8/1/05, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/05, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's what I need now:
1) The Clearlooks Metacity theme needs to be landed into CVS
in gnome-themes. Any number of people have provided patches
for this, including me.
2
On 7/25/05, Christian Neumair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Samstag, den 23.07.2005, 00:58 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
Am Freitag, den 22.07.2005, 08:38 -0600 schrieb Elijah Newren:
On 7/22/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 09:57 -0400, Luis Villa
On 7/23/05, Davyd Madeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As per bug #143784 [1]:
Nautilus windows and dialogs are centred on their parent, this
doesn't work when their parent is the desktop, as the desktop spans
all monitors the dialog commonly ends up in the split between
monitors (ie. the
On 7/22/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 09:57 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Honestly, any reason to wait to 2.14?
I'd like to, but I just don't think its very good form to do it post
feature freeze.
When it fixes all kinds of bugs that ought to be
On 7/22/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/22/05, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Federico,
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 22:58 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
I work in the desktop team at Novell, and a large part of my work
consists of maintaining NLD 9, which
On 7/21/05, Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a separate note:
I still think that making Gnome 2.12 depend on Gtk 2.8 is a mistake
considering that there is no way Gnome 2.12 could take advantage of the
handful of APIs at this point: we are already supposed to have chosen
the
On 7/21/05, Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For how long has the QA team been running a Gtk 2.7.3 based desktop?
And what kinds of tests have been done? I mean to get an idea of the
testing happening in this area that lead to this very strong
endorsement.
We know that the
On 7/21/05, Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We know that the testing at most has been running for six days.
No, you don't. You asserted it. And it happens to be false. ;-)
How exactly have you been testing Gnome with Gtk 2.7.3 for more than six
days, I would love
Just a quick clarification...
On 7/21/05, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/21/05, Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How exactly have you been testing Gnome with Gtk 2.7.3 for more than six
days, I would love to know what kind of time machine you have.
The original
On 7/20/05, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 14:56 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
So this is what gives me the printer icon in the notification tray in
fedora? Ubuntu has something similar? That's gnome-cups-icon, right?
What's the story/comparison
On 7/20/05, Miguel de Icaza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
This was sort of already decided in the thread, but after the release
team meeting today, we figured it was worth mentioning officially.
GNOME 2.12 *will* depend on gtk 2.8.
This seems to add significant risk to Gnome 2.12
Hi all,
The number of keywords[1] in bugzilla is ridiculously huge making them
almost completely useless. We've identified a few dozen to nuke as a
starting point in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302635,
but thought we'd give people a chance to complain as there may be
reason to save
On 7/18/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the record, because fedora/rh basically actively discourage people
from using rawhide (though this is less true than it used to be),
'rawhide does $FOO' is not particularly persuasive to the QA team- the
evidence suggests that most people
On 7/18/05, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. It was suggested that I should 'make distcheck' in tinderbox.
Opinions?
Luis is cool for doing all this tinderbox work.
Sane? Insane?
Does it matter? I think it'd be useful, though I'm betting libwnck
fails and I'll be unable to fix it
On 7/13/05, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that necessarily
going to please 100% of ISVs? No. (Possibly not even 50%.) Will it be
useful anyway? IMHO, yes. While we should definitely get Bryan's input
and attempt to accomodate it as much as practicable, lets please not
bog this
On 7/12/05, Ed Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Click-to-focus-and-raise is a legacy feature.
Copy-on-select and middle mouse button paste _is_ extremely useful,
specially combined with focus-follows-mouse.
Statements like yours always seem, to me, like those of a Windows
fan-boy...
Hi,
I've created a gnome-2-10 branch for metacity (we've only had bugfixes
that didn't break any freezes up until now).
Elijah
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On 7/9/05, Owen Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 14:04 -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
People who know or care what these capplets do are such a small,
hyper-advanced set of users that I think asking them to install a
separate package is not a large request.
-Alex
On 5/23/05, Kai Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I hope I picked the right list to ask. If I add StartupNotify=true to
the .desktop file of a Non-GNOME/GTK application could this lead to
problems?
Yes, the busy cursor could be stuck for a while (about 15 seconds)
after the window is
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the right place for this (some could go to
gnome-bugsquad, other parts to gnome-love, others to who-knows
where...so I'm sure someone will redirect us if need be), but I
thought I'd chip in and include some ideas for ways to fix things
(warning: I'm highly verbose
It would probably be better to take this question to
gtk-app-devel-list (see
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list).
Cheers,
Elijah
On 5/2/05, Ashok jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have created a widget by using gtk APIs like this:
//Window creation
On 4/19/05, Jeroen Zwartepoorte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simple example: eog has rotate image functionality. Does such
functionality belong in a PDF viewer?
May be a bad example, but Adobe Acrobat (v 7.0, at least) has a rotate
feature for viewing pdf files.
Cheers,
Elijah
It used to work this way.
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89315#c19
And I even *fixed* it 3 years ago!
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80291
I don't even know why it got dropped...
Well, you could read the last comment in the bug you pointed us to in
order to
On 4/18/05, Chris Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, though, the decision was made years ago that wraparound
isn't wanted. This discussion doesn't belong on d-d-l anymore.
Then perhaps you can summarize that argument, or point me to the comment
which succinctly states why
On Apr 11, 2005 5:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok so the right way to implement the 81704 is to hardcode a value ( the right
value is a 10 pixel gap) and to post the diff between modified code and the
cvs
window.c source ane window.h source ?
Is that right ?
Thanks a
On Apr 10, 2005 11:12 AM, Luca Cavalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
my current metacity (but also older ones) already has magnetic window
movement, just hit 'shift' key while drag the title bar (or 'alt'+drag
the whole window).
And the fact that it's off by default is a good hint that it's
On Apr 6, 2005 3:43 AM, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill,
I'm sure if it isn't just a joke, they're only bumping the number
which
new bugs start at and are only doing it because they're taking down the
server anyway.
Hehe, I thought Olav's email was one of the funniest
Hey Bill,
On Apr 6, 2005 10:09 AM, Bill Haneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiya Elijah:
Sorry for the noise. I'm afraid this was a 'Bill goes off half-cocked'
day, at least on this (non)-issue. I reserve the right to have my other
posts taken seriously however ;-)
No worries. It looks
Hi,
On Apr 5, 2005 3:28 PM, JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest that during the period during the release candidate and
code freeze we announce code changes to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (just like we do
at other times for string/ui changes). Just prompts maintainers to step
back
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:28:36 -0800, Shahms King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 09:19 -0800, Alan wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 08:09:32AM -0800, Shahms King wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 02:33 -0500, Joseph Zennario wrote:
I have a suggestion for the desktop for
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:39:08 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ Another alternative, already discussed but turned down because of
missing XML-RPC bugzilla interface
I believe delayed until a later version of bugzilla or until someone
ported something to Gnome
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:41:56 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and they don't vote in web polls on osnews
nobody said anything about this being an osnews project (might get hosted
there, but not being an osnews project). I needed this to be an *official
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:02:54 +0100, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 13:09 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 19:52 +0100, Paolo Borelli wrote:
Hi,
we need to revert http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168262,
since the patch is
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:02:12 +0100, Ronald S. Bultje
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169021 contains a fix for a
potential crasher that several people reported for RC1. It's a two-line
fix. The issue is that request pages 1-4 from a list, whereas we may
Hi Christian,
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:21:19 +0100, Christian Neumair
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here we go. This is the first release of gnome-menu-editor, an
application meant to allow simple menu editing according the menu-spec;
it is coded after a proposal that Seth once published in may or
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:05:39 +, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 16:50 +, Bill Haneman wrote:
We still have the problem that we are 6 days from code freeze with a
change in API which we depend on. So the solution proposed below
(re-implementing the
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:40:10 +, Mark McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 10:19 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
i.e. the change has happened, you're going to have to deal with
it. I
don't think this was neccessarily went against any policy, because we
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:43:21 +0100, Torsten Schoenfeld
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 10:09 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
I know the position you're in sucks, but I'm willing to help you out
with it. Note that Anders Carlsson changed API in libwnck for
wnck_window_close
Minor correction...
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:09:54 -0700, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:12:30 +0100, Fernando Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elijah: would this timestamp be ok here?
Actually, I don't know (I haven't looked close enough at the code
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:55:18 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the wrong approach. The window manager is responsible for
making things fit on screen. It alone has the last world under ICCCM on
window sizes.
What if the window can not be resized because it was
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 07:23:31 -0600, Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 08:08 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Bah, this was predictable. Because it's a trivial UI fix instead of any
other kind of trivial fix, it becomes a huge thread and gets shot down
for bad
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:47:21 +0100, Alexander Fieroch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
is there any possibility to move application windows above the top
panel? I can move windows below the bottom panel but not above the top
one and so I feel
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:54:46 +1100, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Bryan Clark
And just to take the flames point head on, no flames do not generally mean
that what was done was the wrong thing, they generally mean that very
vocal people are upset that things changed.
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 09:58:09 +0100, Benoit Caccinolo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This site is really usefull but I was thinking about a site containing
only *official* parts of the Gnome Desktop. Arriving on gnome.org, I
would like to be able to parse all projects of the gnome desktop. A bit
What's up with the cross-posting madness? ;-)
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:14:28 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 12:02, Martin Grimme wrote:
Imagine the following scenario:
- user clicks on scrollbar arrow
- scrollbar knows that it should not raise
Hi,
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:29:46 +0530, Pankaj kaushal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I found some bugs in the Stickynotes applet. I downloaded the source
from the cvs and compiled it successfully with --prefix=/hom/pankaj/temp/
so all the directory structure is created there. How do I
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 20:32:28 +0100, Markus Bertheau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
, 2005-01-23 14:25 -0500, Luis Villa :
Hey, all... we've got /600/ unreviewed patches in bugzilla. That is
totally embarassing. :(
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/reports/patch-diligence-report.cgi
This list lists
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 23:58:54 +0800, Davyd Madeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 14:56 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
Because this is a new applet that is almost certainly not documented
yet, here's 1 UI-freeze-break approval, of a necessary 2.
But I don't consider this
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 09:31:42 -0500, Andrew Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can and will attach two. But they will probably of no use. The problem
does not appear to be something in the main loop, but in an idle
handler/callback(I think the window settings changed event - gconf
update
301 - 361 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
