On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:27 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 22:47 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Matthias Clasen
> > wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Colin Walte
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 22:47 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:46 PM, Matthias Clasen
> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Colin Walters
> wrote:
>
> >
> >> Do we have (makefile) infrastructure to allow GTests to run
>
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 16:41 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
This general plan looks really good to me. I think it'd help us really
tighten up quality at the boundaries of our projects.
> On 25/04/13 15:45, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Though you've got me thinking: maybe instead of
> > the /usr/bin/foo-
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 07:24 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> 695741nor Nor Linugnome-contacUNCO
> contacts is really slow to start
It's possible that this is due to a performance issue in libfolks. We've
been picking up performance work lately (starting with add
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 23:26 +0400, Nikita Churaev wrote:
> OK, so it seems that GNOME has a serious aim on making GNOME/JavaScript
> the preferred platform for new newbies.
I'd just like to reiterate that the idea isn't that JavaScript is
preferred for new developers or "smaller" applications (wha
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 07:39 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Travis,
>
> Travis Reitter [2013-02-17 22:24 -0800]:
> > Speaking of test failures - is it possible to get more details? All I
> > can seem to turn up for the "folks" module test failures are:
> &
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:54 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Martin Pitt [2013-02-12 7:43 +0100]:
> > https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Raring/view/JHBuild%20Gnome/
> >
> > Right now there are 151 successes (blue), 5 modules fail to build
> > (red), and 4 modules build but fail in "make check" (yel
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 23:08 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> hi;
>
> On 13 February 2013 22:11, Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 06:42 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> >
> >> I know, it sounds like some CPU will be melting quickly
> >> at the rate gnome-wide commits are made... but
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 17:55 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> PS: One of the fun things this will allow is... to hand out build
> breaker
> awards (something we used to do in a company I worked at, was to
> hand out an "award" to the committer which introduced the most
> build breaks this month, m
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 07:43 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello fellow GNOME developers,
>
> this already came up as a side issue recently[1], but now we are at a
> point where have reasonably stabilized our GNOME jhbuild continuous
> builds/integration test server to become actually useful:
>
>
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 14:05 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 11:23 -0800, Travis Reitter wrote:
>
> > I think our best bet for a usable SDK would be something that sets up a
> > QEMU instance on top of OSTree
>
> I have scripts for this
> (
> htt
On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 19:09 +0100, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> 2012/12/30 Jasper St. Pierre :
> > Can we just redirect build.gnome.org to ostree.gnome.org ?
> >
> > Having it build apps or something like that on top of its root tree as a
> > separate build process would be nice.
>
> FWIW, I'm curre
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 09:17 +0300, pec...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> Since GNOME Shell 3.2 I love feature of overview accessing contacts
> database and looking up their status. However, while I understand
> reasoning to have default behaviour to just open entry in Contacts
> app, I would
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:43 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Colin
>
> The issue is not so much time as unreliability. I've tried to
> address
> some of those with jhbuild, but there are two major ones
> remaining:
>
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 18:34 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> Are you guys using jhbuild for 3.4?
>
> In the big picture where I'd like to be is that git master of all of
> these modules are targeted for the 3.4 release. Or if for some reason
> you don't want to synchronize to the GNOME schedule, at
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 22:53 +, Philip Withnall wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 13:57 -0800, Travis Reitter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 16:32 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> > > But others (folks at least) fail to compile with 0.15. So
Hi,
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 16:32 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> But others (folks at least) fail to compile with 0.15. So far we've
> been relying on the fact that the .c files are cached in the tarball for
> folks, but this is pretty broken. Jhbuild is supposed to to be the
> developer tool wher
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 15:15 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> > mailto:foo@bar a nco:Contact
> > mailto:foo@bar nco:fullname "Foo Bar"
> > urn:my-resource nco:author mailto:foo@bar
> >
> > The Contacts application doesn't store or read anything in Tracker as
> > far as I know, but goes through libfolk
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 14:31 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> them. People often have weird nicknames anyway, that I don't remember but
> which I can recognize when I see them in a list and searching is not
> particularly helpful here.
I don't think this will be too big of an issue for most people.
Hi Dave,
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 10:46 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Travis Reitter wrote:
> > In general, I think there are a few scales of contact sources we should
> > consider (from smallest to largest / most- to least-frequent
> > communication):
> >
&g
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 16:43 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 16:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > One more addition for your 'tasks involving contacts' list:
> > * Schedule a meeting and invite participants
>
> Speaking of corporatey use cases, the traditional address book i
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:43 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> So, what kind of things do we now want to do with our contacts
> information? Here is a pretty comprehensive list of things that you
> might need contact information for.
Another long-term (after Gnome 3.2) class of use cases I'd lik
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:54 +0100, Will Thompson wrote:
> On 19/04/11 10:39, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 09:53 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote:
> >> Empathy uses the “text/individual-id” and “text/persona-id” drag targets
> >> for dragging and dropping folks individuals and pers
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:01 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 11:52 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 20:29 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
>
> > > While using GNOME 3.0 on my desktop now for a week I wanted to share my
>
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 13:48 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:29 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
> > As Frederic pointed out, we shouldn't be brainstorming on the 3.2
> > feature pages, so I thought I'd fill in some details/thoughts on the
> > Conta
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 12:45 +, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Another conceptual problem is that the server cannot communicate well
> with the user. A client might pop up rich dialogs and ask the user for
> help in cases that it cannot decide automatically (but designing such
> a dialog is an unsolved
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:27 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 09:29 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/telepathy/2011-March/005369.html
> > [4]
>
> This seems to talk about querying contacts from slow social web
> s
Hi Johannes,
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 20:29 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > As far as the actual UX, I think the combination of contact search from
> > the shell Activities view (like Morten Mjelva's SoC idea [4] and the
> > feature bug I've filed [5]) and a "contact center" like Allan Day
As Frederic pointed out, we shouldn't be brainstorming on the 3.2
feature pages, so I thought I'd fill in some details/thoughts on the
Contacts [1] idea here.
The page suggests libfolks and/or libsocialweb for the implementation.
The good news is that Folks 0.5.0 (released last week) added support
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 11:01 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> I think the application name isn't really the big deal and can easily be
> changed to "Chat" or "Instant Messaging" if we intent that. And I think
> closing the window is not essentially necessary, at least it provides the
> contact list
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 22:23 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 20:49 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> accounts-service has a field for e-mails, for the rest, libfolks could
> offer a similar information about the rest of the accounts, though you'd
> still end up depending on e-d-s
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 13:19 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010, à 12:47 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm working on 2.31.92, and it's fun. Or actually, it's not :-) Help
> > from various maintainers is needed to make this release happen.
> folks: need a ne
Hi all,
Empathy now depends upon Folks [1], our contact aggregator library. This
doesn't add any new features yet, but will soon support contact merging.
(And later, much-more-interesting things).
We aren't aware of regressions due to this change, so please file bugs
for any and all you spot.
I'
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 17:37 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 08:23 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
> > Just to clarify a little, it would look like this:
> >
> > telepathye-d-s
> > | |
> &g
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 13:11 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 25/05/2010 alle 11.07 +0200, Frederic Peters ha scritto:
> > New Dependencies
> > =
> >
> > empathy depends on:
> > libfolks
> >
> > libfolks depends on:
> > telepathy-glib Vala bindings [3] (should b
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> It arrived late and was limited to the release team, but as we didn't
>> announce module decisions yet, if you have any comment on this
>> proposal for a new exter
1:37 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> You appear to have not read the thread.
>
> On 9/23/07, Travis Reitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason,
>
> Motivation for unpaid Free Software development isn't the same
> as for
>
As the lead developer of Soylent, I thought I'd add my own opinions
based on experience with libempathy(-gtk).
Using libempathy(-gtk) as a Telepathy wrapper made it very easy for me
to integrate instant messaging into Soylent. I've found the API to be
very consistent and thereby easy to use.
The
Jason,
Motivation for unpaid Free Software development isn't the same as for
commercial software. You can't just tell someone which project(s) they
get to work on. They will work on which project(s) they think are most
interesting and/or important or they'll choose to do something else with
their
Olav,
That sounds great. I'll volunteer to be the first, as soon as my SVN
account request is approved! :)
(Originally requested July 24th (email dropped somehow), re-requested
Sept. 4th (got the auto-reply)).
-Travis
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 00:18 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> Within another proje
> Empathy itself is an IM client. It's basically gaim (pidgin) based
> around Telepathy instead of its own protocol plugins.
Frédéric asked me for a correction on this, so I might as well repeat it
here: Empathy is a fork of Gossip, so it's got a much simpler UI than
gaim.
-Travis
__
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 12:18 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 08:53 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:42 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > So, I think I agree a lot with the basic premises here. But when
&
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 15:42 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> So, I think I agree a lot with the basic premises here. But when
> I look at:
>
> > Basic Architecture
> > ==
> >
> > [Desktop People Apps] <-> [Empathy] <-> [e-d-s] <->
> > [Online desktop server]
>
> That just does
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 07:08 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 22:27 -0700, Travis Reitter wrote:
> > 4. A daemon to initiate and perform data synchronization and merging.
> > This could be a modified version of eds-sync (though that requires a
> > special
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 06:51 -0700, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > 2. We need an Online Desktop preferences applet (mainly to choose your
> > Online Dekstop provider (if any)).
>
> Would be great if this were part of the 'About Me' dialogue.
>
> - Jeff
>
Ah, right! It's definitely a natural fit th
At GUADEC, a number of the people-centric software people (from Soylent,
Banter, Empathy, Telepathy, Mugshot/Online Desktop) got together to
discuss some issues around integrating our work.
Here are some ideas for the short-term implementation, to get us rolling
on integration. Many of these based
> The best thing to do is to code up these prototypes - having working
> code is half way towards making agreement and acceptance a reality (IE
> its far harder to argue for something radically different if there's no
> code to show)
>
> just my penny for a thought...
I agree with Jamie here.
Hi!
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 02:02 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Travis Reitter wrote:
> > 1. Pick a short list of major concepts to put into Topaz.
> >
> > We don't need perfect consensus at this stage, but it'd be nice to start
> > formi
This kicked off a few ideas for me:
Topaz basically seems to be so massive a change that some extremely
enthusiastic people are flinging high-level concepts at the wiki
(without developing them - I'm responsible for one of these [which I've
since removed]), while others (who seem to tend to be mor
Disclaimer: sorry if these lists aren't ideal to announce a project
idea, but it seems like a good complement to a live.gnome.org page.
==
Over the last few months (without much concerted effort), I've put some
thought into what seems to be a cleaner way to use the Gnome desktop to
communicate
50 matches
Mail list logo
