Heya,
gnome-bluetooth[1] and gnome-shell[2] have been ported to use BlueZ 5,
the new major version of the Bluetooth handling daemon and utilities[3],
and will available in GNOME 3.10.
gnome-user-share is still being worked on [4] as it requires some
obexd/bluetoothd changes. NetworkManager port i
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 11:42 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Heya,
>
> gnome-bluetooth[1] and gnome-shell[2] have been ported to use BlueZ 5,
> the new major version of the Bluetooth handling daemon and utilities[3],
> and will available in GNOME 3.10.
>
> gnome-user-share is still being worked on
On 27 June 2013 14:09, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>
> I had brought this up on IRC, but that morphed into a discussion with
> the BlueZ folks, so let me just summarise here:
>
> * The latest released PulseAudio does not support BlueZ 5, only BlueZ 4
> The BlueZ folks (João Paulo and Mikel) have bee
Em Thu, 2013-06-27 às 15:41 +0100, Javier Jardón escreveu:
> A question about BlueZ: Is version 4 parallel installable with version 5?
No.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 15:41 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote:
> On 27 June 2013 14:09, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> >
> > I had brought this up on IRC, but that morphed into a discussion with
> > the BlueZ folks, so let me just summarise here:
> >
> > * The latest released PulseAudio does not support BlueZ 5,
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 17:46 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 15:41 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote:
> > On 27 June 2013 14:09, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> > >
> > > I had brought this up on IRC, but that morphed into a discussion with
> > > the BlueZ folks, so let me just summarise here:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I'd rather ship without Bluetooth audio support in 3.10.0 and have the
> support come in in an subsequent point update. This is definitely better
> than relying on unsupported versions of BlueZ.
I don't think that shipping without BT audio
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 17:46 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
[...]
> > I think it makes sense to use this approach with 3.10 as well - support
> > BlueZ 4 and 5 as a compile-time option for this release, get some more
> > user-testing during thi
Looping in Luiz Augusto von Dentz from the BlueZ side since he might
want to pitch in as well.
Cheers,
Arun
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 15:02 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 17:46 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> [...]
> > >
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 15:02 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 17:46 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> [...]
> > > I think it makes sense to use this approach with 3.10 as well - support
> > > BlueZ 4 and 5 as a compile-time
Hi Arun,
Thanks for adding me...
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Arun Raghavan
wrote:
> Looping in Luiz Augusto von Dentz from the BlueZ side since he might
> want to pitch in as well.
>
> Cheers,
> Arun
>
> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 15:02 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I'd rather ship without Bluetooth audio support in 3.10.0
You're kidding, right?
We *can't* do that.
This is where release-team gets involved, isn't it? Please? I mean,
we're going to have yet another PR disaster if the headlines at 3.1
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 01:35 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > I'd rather ship without Bluetooth audio support in 3.10.0
>
> You're kidding, right?
No. It's PulseAudio's remit, not GNOME's. And until the day we're
shipping an actual product,
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 17:44 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 01:35 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > I'd rather ship without Bluetooth audio support in 3.10.0
> >
> > You're kidding, right?
>
> No. It's PulseAudio's
Em Tue, 2013-07-02 às 15:29 +0530, Arun Raghavan escreveu:
> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 17:44 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 01:35 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > > I'd rather ship without Bluetooth audio support in
Hello all,
On 2 July 2013 13:08, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> Do discuss this with the release team if necessary. I think that the
> short-term regression is worth it for the longer-term benefits.
This issue was discussed in the latest release team meeting [1]:
- Pulseaudio developers plan a freez
16 matches
Mail list logo