BlueZ 5 migration

2013-06-14 Thread Bastien Nocera
Heya, gnome-bluetooth[1] and gnome-shell[2] have been ported to use BlueZ 5, the new major version of the Bluetooth handling daemon and utilities[3], and will available in GNOME 3.10. gnome-user-share is still being worked on [4] as it requires some obexd/bluetoothd changes. NetworkManager port i

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-06-27 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 11:42 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Heya, > > gnome-bluetooth[1] and gnome-shell[2] have been ported to use BlueZ 5, > the new major version of the Bluetooth handling daemon and utilities[3], > and will available in GNOME 3.10. > > gnome-user-share is still being worked on

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-06-27 Thread Javier Jardón
On 27 June 2013 14:09, Arun Raghavan wrote: > > I had brought this up on IRC, but that morphed into a discussion with > the BlueZ folks, so let me just summarise here: > > * The latest released PulseAudio does not support BlueZ 5, only BlueZ 4 > The BlueZ folks (João Paulo and Mikel) have bee

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-06-27 Thread Bastien Nocera
Em Thu, 2013-06-27 às 15:41 +0100, Javier Jardón escreveu: > A question about BlueZ: Is version 4 parallel installable with version 5? No. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-06-28 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 15:41 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote: > On 27 June 2013 14:09, Arun Raghavan wrote: > > > > I had brought this up on IRC, but that morphed into a discussion with > > the BlueZ folks, so let me just summarise here: > > > > * The latest released PulseAudio does not support BlueZ 5,

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-07-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 17:46 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: > On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 15:41 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote: > > On 27 June 2013 14:09, Arun Raghavan wrote: > > > > > > I had brought this up on IRC, but that morphed into a discussion with > > > the BlueZ folks, so let me just summarise here:

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-07-01 Thread drago01
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > I'd rather ship without Bluetooth audio support in 3.10.0 and have the > support come in in an subsequent point update. This is definitely better > than relying on unsupported versions of BlueZ. I don't think that shipping without BT audio

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-07-01 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 17:46 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: [...] > > I think it makes sense to use this approach with 3.10 as well - support > > BlueZ 4 and 5 as a compile-time option for this release, get some more > > user-testing during thi

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-07-01 Thread Arun Raghavan
Looping in Luiz Augusto von Dentz from the BlueZ side since he might want to pitch in as well. Cheers, Arun On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 15:02 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 17:46 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: > [...] > > >

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-07-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 15:02 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 17:46 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: > [...] > > > I think it makes sense to use this approach with 3.10 as well - support > > > BlueZ 4 and 5 as a compile-time

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-07-01 Thread Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Arun, Thanks for adding me... On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Arun Raghavan wrote: > Looping in Luiz Augusto von Dentz from the BlueZ side since he might > want to pitch in as well. > > Cheers, > Arun > > On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 15:02 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: >> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-07-01 Thread Andrew Cowie
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > I'd rather ship without Bluetooth audio support in 3.10.0 You're kidding, right? We *can't* do that. This is where release-team gets involved, isn't it? Please? I mean, we're going to have yet another PR disaster if the headlines at 3.1

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-07-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 01:35 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > I'd rather ship without Bluetooth audio support in 3.10.0 > > You're kidding, right? No. It's PulseAudio's remit, not GNOME's. And until the day we're shipping an actual product,

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-07-02 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 17:44 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 01:35 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > I'd rather ship without Bluetooth audio support in 3.10.0 > > > > You're kidding, right? > > No. It's PulseAudio's

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-07-02 Thread Bastien Nocera
Em Tue, 2013-07-02 às 15:29 +0530, Arun Raghavan escreveu: > On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 17:44 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 01:35 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 09:47 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > I'd rather ship without Bluetooth audio support in

Re: BlueZ 5 migration

2013-07-17 Thread Javier Jardón
Hello all, On 2 July 2013 13:08, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Do discuss this with the release team if necessary. I think that the > short-term regression is worth it for the longer-term benefits. This issue was discussed in the latest release team meeting [1]: - Pulseaudio developers plan a freez