On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
In general I have the feeling that the GTK+ stack on Windows is on a
downward slope. Each new release introduces new stuff that never gets
fully implemented/tested for Windows, like the client-side windows.
Note that I am not
Paollo Borelli wrote:
As a user of the python bindings a clarification of the current status
of things and the remaining TODO list would be very helpful. I admit I
have not been following closely, but I bet I am not the only one who
does not know the answers to do these questions:
- how far is
- what is the status of pygi (and introspection in general) with regard
to portability to Windows
I did some hacking on getting gobject-introspection to build for
Windows one weekend, and I did get it to build, and I think make
check even passed mostly, but no idea whether it actually works
Hi Tomeu,
On Thu 14 Jan 2010 16:29, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org writes:
Pygi is still far away from being an usable replacement of static
bindings, at the current development rate.
Why is that? Is the gobject-inspection metadata not expressive enough,
or does pygi not implement all that
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 20:59, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
On Thu 14 Jan 2010 16:29, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org writes:
Pygi is still far away from being an usable replacement of static
bindings, at the current development rate.
Why is that? Is the gobject-inspection
As a user of the python bindings a clarification of the current status
of things and the remaining TODO list would be very helpful. I admit I
have not been following closely, but I bet I am not the only one who
does not know the answers to do these questions:
- how far is pygi from being
2010/1/11 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 03:01 +0100 schrieb Alberto Ruiz:
2009/7/29 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
=
ZERO modules dependening on gnome-vfs
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 11:22 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote:
gnome-python-desktop module supports:
- brasero
- evince
- evolution
- gnomeapplet
- gnomedesktop
- gnomekeyring
- gnomeprint (deprecated by GtkPrint)
- gtksourceview
- gtop
- mediaprofiles
- metacity
- nautilusburn (obsoleted
2010/1/14 Javier Jardón javierjc1...@gmail.com:
2010/1/11 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 03:01 +0100 schrieb Alberto Ruiz:
2009/7/29 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
=
ZERO modules dependening on
Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 03:01 +0100 schrieb Alberto Ruiz:
2009/7/29 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
=
ZERO modules dependening on gnome-vfs
=
COMPLETED -
See http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyseven for the schedule.
Stats for all projects at http://www.gnome.org/~fpeters/299.html .
If you want to help kill libgnome(ui) by providing patches:
Todo list sorted by functionality available at
http://live.gnome.org/AndreKlapper/GCDS3
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 20:50 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
* We have gconf-dbus in the Mobile set, but it looks dead, plus
gconf itself has much better stats. So is this officially
dead?
I've a repo on github[1] which has started merging all of the recent
changes to GConf, with the
Andre Klapper schrieb:
=
ZERO modules dependening on Esound
=
NOT COMPLETED (reopened).
low: 1 (gst-plugins-good)
Most probably a WONTFIX?
can you blacklist it?
2009/7/29 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
=
ZERO modules dependening on gnome-vfs
=
COMPLETED - Bindings left:
complex: 1 (gnome-python)
average: 1 (gnome-sharp)
I
14 matches
Mail list logo
