Fixing old bugs :)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Are there any suggestions towards jumplists?
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Seif Lotfy wrote:
> The Jump-list stuff has been on my list for a while:
> What we are facing here is:
>
> Adding actions to the appmenus: new tab (browser), new note (for tomboy
> or gnote) or pause (for the media
2011/10/8 Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) :
> Hi Mathias,
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Matthias Clasen
> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> so according to the draft schedule that Andre posted a while ago, we
>> are in the middle of the 'feature proposal' period right now. I
>> haven't seen much feature discussio
Hi,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Matthias Clasen
> wrote:
>>
>> Where are your ideas ? It would be great to get them onto that wiki
>> page, in particular since next weekend a bunch of us will get together
>> in Montreal to, among other things, spend time t
> Features !
>
> From: Matthias Clasen
> To: desktop-devel-list
> Subject: Features !
> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:17:00 -0400
> so according to the draft schedule that Andre posted a while ago, we
> are in the middle of the 'feature proposal' period right now. I
> haven't seen much feature discus
On sáb, 2011-10-08 at 11:48 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> GNOME's implementation is very young; I have a hard time finding apps
> on my computer using this feature even in GNOME 3.2;
There are no jumplists in GNOME 3.2, which explains your troubles
finding apps making use of this feature ;-)
Flor
On 6 October 2011 08:13, Seif Lotfy wrote:
> The Jump-list stuff has been on my list for a while:
> What we are facing here is:
> Adding actions to the appmenus: new tab (browser), new note (for tomboy
> or gnote) or pause (for the media players)
> Adding document shortcuts in the appmenus
Hi Mathias,
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> so according to the draft schedule that Andre posted a while ago, we
> are in the middle of the 'feature proposal' period right now. I
> haven't seen much feature discussion here at all yet, and so far, the
> wiki only
On 6 Oct 2011, at 10:31, Martyn Russell wrote:
> - Is the "universal access" configuration page meant to be in a larger font
> and look completely different to the other page fonts?
Yes -- you'll notice it's only the "Seeing" tab that has the bigger font, for
(hopefully) somewhat obvious reason
Le jeudi 06 octobre 2011 à 10:34 +0200, Joaquim Rocha a écrit :
> Still on the bottom area, I wish that when my status is available,
> notifications would stick in a visible area. It often happens that I'm
> far from the keyboard for 5 minutes, meanwhile a notification came (say
> someone is tryin
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 09:08 -0700, Michael Knepher wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Matthias Clasen
> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Joaquim Rocha
> wrote:
>
> > Why not have a switch in the Universal Access settings that
> shows/hides
>
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
>
> > Why not have a switch in the Universal Access settings that shows/hides
> > the icon/menu?
>
> That's a trick question, right ? I would love to see you use the
> switch to bring the
Changing subject. As Matthias said, this is somewhat off-topic, as the
original thread was about start to propose features.
On 10/06/2011 01:50 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Someone said, "well, if it is my house, I should be able to chose", the
>> reason that rationale doesn't work is because the GNOME
On 6 October 2011 15:55, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
>> yes, that makes sense indeed. But apart from that, it should really
>> support all kind of tablets, not only Wacom ones :)
>
> Of course. That's sort of orthogonal though. As far as I know,
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 16:54 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:49 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> > >>
> > >> - Integration with thunderbird in the calendar
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> yes, that makes sense indeed. But apart from that, it should really
> support all kind of tablets, not only Wacom ones :)
Of course. That's sort of orthogonal though. As far as I know, the
realistic problem is that we currently only have a go
On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:49 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> >>
> >> - Integration with thunderbird in the calendar (there is a red hat bug
> >> about this somewhere I saw recently)
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> - Integration with thunderbird in the calendar (there is a red hat bug
> about this somewhere I saw recently)
Also see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660720
> - Why show the "wacom graphics tablet" configuration page in the "
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
>>
>> - Integration with thunderbird in the calendar (there is a red hat bug
>> about this somewhere I saw recently)
>>
>> - Why show the "wacom graphics tablet" configuration page in th
On jue, 2011-10-06 at 10:31 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
>
> - Integration with thunderbird in the calendar (there is a red hat bug
> about this somewhere I saw recently)
>
> - Why show the "wacom graphics tablet" configuration page in the "System
> Settings" if I don't have one? (perhaps Ubunt
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
>>
>> It should be easy to do because the purpose of the desktop is to make
>> things easy. I agree you don't want it off automatically because you need
>> to be sure that a user can find the accessibility features if they do
>> need them.
>
>
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 13:28 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > You're assuming the install and the setup is done by a) the same person that
> > is going to use the computer, which is not the case most of the time and b)
> > that the person that uses the computer is always the same one.
>
> No.
>
> > Not
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 08:58 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > The worst part of the shell for me is the bottom tray area (sorry if
> > this is not the official name for it).
>
> The message tray.
Thanks.
> [...]
> >
> > I think that a good way to fix this is to remove the expanding
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 08:37 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> I love the shell generally though, this is really just where I think we
>> could improve things.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I second Martyn's proposals and I'd like to name a few thin
> You're assuming the install and the setup is done by a) the same person that
> is going to use the computer, which is not the case most of the time and b)
> that the person that uses the computer is always the same one.
No.
> Not true, some seats have unique users (think of a university lab, or
2011/10/6 Alberto Ruiz :
>> The flaw in your logic starts beyond the front door. Clearly the login
>> process should be accessible, and the install and setup so that a user
>> can always get their system set up.
>
> You're assuming the install and the setup is done by a) the same person that
> is g
The Jump-list stuff has been on my list for a while:
What we are facing here is:
Adding actions to the appmenus: new tab (browser), new note (for tomboy
or gnote) or pause (for the media players)
Adding document shortcuts in the appmenus: 4 most recent documents and
other most used (in the
2011/10/6 Alan Cox
> > Someone said, "well, if it is my house, I should be able to chose", the
> > reason that rationale doesn't work is because the GNOME Shell experience
> > should be designed to be inclusive, so this is really closer to an office
> > building or an apartment building instead o
> Someone said, "well, if it is my house, I should be able to chose", the
> reason that rationale doesn't work is because the GNOME Shell experience
> should be designed to be inclusive, so this is really closer to an office
> building or an apartment building instead of a private house.
The flaw
2011/10/6 Martyn Russell
>
> - The "Switch User" and "Log Out" ... menu options seem quite pointless if
> I am the only user on my machine.
>
> - The "Suspend" menu option makes no sense here when I want to shut the
> thing down (on laptops), I guess this has been discussed to death so I don't
2011/10/6 Piñeiro
>
> > - Don't show the accessibility menu unless needed. I never use this
> > menu and I don't doubt some people do, but it seems quite redundant
> > for me and likely a lot of people.
>
> What means "unless needed" in this context? How would be the algorithm
> to decide if that
On 10/06/2011 09:37 AM, Martyn Russell wrote:
> I certainly have some ideas to improve things for my user experience.
> Most of them are general so perhaps we should have a general page from
> the link you gave previously.
>
> In any case, here are my thoughts:
>
> - Don't show the accessibility m
On 2011-10-06 11:51, Olav Vitters wrote:
> So when discussing, please note that we expect someone to work on it or
> somehow ensure it gets done. I know everyone has loads of ideas, please
> say what you'll (want to) work on for 3.4 / 3.6 :)
>
> Then the discussion can be a bit more concrete (whose
On 06/10/11 11:05, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals
wrote:
2011/10/6 Martyn Russell:
Or, similarly to how mac did it? does it? using a jumping icon or changing
the colour or some notification which is subtle. With an icon appearing in
the
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals
wrote:
> 2011/10/6 Martyn Russell :
>> Or, similarly to how mac did it? does it? using a jumping icon or changing
>> the colour or some notification which is subtle. With an icon appearing in
>> the top (like the battery icon) which
Hi,
2011/10/6 Martyn Russell :
> Or, similarly to how mac did it? does it? using a jumping icon or changing
> the colour or some notification which is subtle. With an icon appearing in
> the top (like the battery icon) which allows you to use your contacts
> (favourite or recently communicated wit
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 04:17:00PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Where are your ideas ? It would be great to get them onto that wiki
> page, in particular since next weekend a bunch of us will get together
> in Montreal to, among other things, spend time to talk about 3.4
> features.
One importa
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 10:27:51AM +0100, Nick Glynn wrote:
> Maybe something like the Ubuntu/Dell brain/ideastorm would be a nice
> addition to the Gnome website for these sorts of proposals?
The idea behind feature proposal time is that each proposal has a clear
owner. It is *not* request what y
On 06/10/11 08:37, Martyn Russell wrote:
On 05/10/11 21:17, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey,
Hi,
so according to the draft schedule that Andre posted a while ago, we
are in the middle of the 'feature proposal' period right now. I
haven't seen much feature discussion here at all yet, and so far, t
Hi,
On 6 October 2011 09:48, Martyn Russell wrote:
> On 06/10/11 09:34, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 08:37 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I love the shell generally though, this is really just where I think we
>>> could improve things.
>>>
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>
>
On 06/10/11 09:34, Joaquim Rocha wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 08:37 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
[...]
I love the shell generally though, this is really just where I think we
could improve things.
Hi,
Hi,
I second Martyn's proposals and I'd like to name a few things that at
least in my c
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 08:37 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> [...]
>
> I love the shell generally though, this is really just where I think we
> could improve things.
>
Hi,
I second Martyn's proposals and I'd like to name a few things that at
least in my case, could be improved.
The worst part
On 05/10/11 21:17, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey,
Hi,
so according to the draft schedule that Andre posted a while ago, we
are in the middle of the 'feature proposal' period right now. I
haven't seen much feature discussion here at all yet, and so far, the
wiki only lists things that I have put
Hi!
> I guess I'm not clear on what requires a feature proposal. For example,
> what about my ideas to have dynamic help buttons and menus, which I've
> brought up on gtk-devel-list? I figured I'd just keep hacking on that
> and convince maintainers one by one. Should I propose that?
>
I, persona
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 16:17 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> so according to the draft schedule that Andre posted a while ago, we
> are in the middle of the 'feature proposal' period right now. I
> haven't seen much feature discussion here at all yet, and so far, the
> wiki only lists thin
On mié, 2011-10-05 at 16:22 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> For the shell: mode-switch kill? Overview window borders?
Yes, Jakub and me are planning on working on mode-switch kill.
Florian
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnom
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> so according to the draft schedule that Andre posted a while ago, we
> are in the middle of the 'feature proposal' period right now. I
> haven't seen much feature discussion here at all yet, and so far, the
> wiki only lists things
Hello Alexandre,
We will soon have 3.2 released, and it's quite time to discuss things
for 3.4, and as I said previously, while the features focused process
is something we really want, the way it happened for 3.2 was
suboptimal. Let's work on this, here are some thoughts.
My goal for features i
Seriously. There *are* those of us out there actively working towards
3.0. We'd get there a lot quicker with more help.
http://beatnik.infogami.com/Gimmie
-Alex
Jeff Waugh wrote:
Write code. Make things happen. That's ultimately what matters.
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 4/20/06, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [1] Holy shit, just stop talking about version numbers at all. It
> > > totally doesn't mean anything useful.
> >
> > I understand you and most developers do not think it is important but
> > woul
On 4/20/06, Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [1] Holy shit, just stop talking about version numbers at all. It
> > totally doesn't mean anything useful.
>
> I understand you and most developers do not think it is important but
> would it kill you to recognise that some people do* and it w
> > [1] Holy shit, just stop talking about version numbers at all. It
> > totally doesn't mean anything useful.
>
> I understand you and most developers do not think it is important but
> would it kill you to recognise that some people do* and it wouldn't hurt
> to try and pin down when it might
> [1] Holy shit, just stop talking about version numbers at all. It
> totally doesn't mean anything useful.
I understand you and most developers do not think it is important but
would it kill you to recognise that some people do* and it wouldn't hurt
to try and pin down when it might happen to so
53 matches
Mail list logo
