Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-09-01 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017, 4:33 AM Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > Before committing to tons more search providers, I'd like to see a bug > and some development effort dedicated to make the providers we already > ship more efficient. > Yes. This could be consolidated with the performance

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-09-01 Thread Adrian Perez de Castro
On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 13:32:51 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 12:20 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > > I have a list of about 12 apps that don't have search providers and > > probably should. I'd love for us to make some progress on that - > > would it make a good

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-09-01 Thread Alberto Ruiz
I am pretty much in agreement with Bastien and Emmanuele here, I've been trying to run GNOME Shell on ARM based devices for a while and things keep getting worse. But even on fast machines UI responsiveness for search-as-you-type is pretty bad and has a bad impact on UX. I'd also like to see

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-09-01 Thread Allan Day
Bastien Nocera wrote: ... > > I have a list of about 12 apps that don't have search providers and > > probably should. I'd love for us to make some progress on that - > > would it make a good goal? > > Let's fix the search providers infrastructure first. They're unusable > on

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-09-01 Thread Debarshi Ray
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:32:42PM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > Before committing to tons more search providers, I'd like to see a bug > and some development effort dedicated to make the providers we already > ship more efficient. As for a bug, there is:

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-09-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 12:20 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > I have a list of about 12 apps that don't have search providers and > probably should. I'd love for us to make some progress on that - > would it make a good goal? Let's fix the search providers infrastructure first. They're unusable on slow

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-09-01 Thread Allan Day
I have a list of about 12 apps that don't have search providers and probably should. I'd love for us to make some progress on that - would it make a good goal? Allan ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-28 Thread Javier Jardón
On 22 August 2017 at 10:46, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > Has anybody looked at the GNOME Goals[1] lately? Is this still something > that is active? I only ask as I know at least some that seem outdated to > me. > > Two are /ModernAutotools and /NicerBuilds. > > Both have goals

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-24 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
2017-08-24 10:55 GMT+02:00 Sébastien Wilmet : > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:45:18AM +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > > Great, one less step. > > > > Then, it's ok to move this goal to the Deprecated Section? We could > include > > the link in the goal comments > >

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-24 Thread Sébastien Wilmet
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:45:18AM +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > Great, one less step. > > Then, it's ok to move this goal to the Deprecated Section? We could include > the link in the goal comments RemoveMarkupInMessages should not be moved to the Deprecated section, it should simply

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-24 Thread Sébastien Wilmet
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:20:45AM +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > have doubts about AddCodeCoverage, DistCheck. - Meson instructions should be added for AddCodeCoverage. - DistCheck is specific to Autotools. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-24 Thread Philip Withnall
On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 09:20 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > Hi, > > Some additional comments: > > - /RemoveMarkupInMessages: it makes no sense to set a goal for this, > because a fixed module today might change tomorrow, introducing new > strings with markup. Maybe should be set as a

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-24 Thread Alexandre Franke
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: > Hi, Hi, > - /RemoveMarkupInMessages: it makes no sense to set a goal for this, because > a fixed module today might change tomorrow, introducing new strings with > markup. Maybe should be set as a

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-24 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
Hi, Some additional comments: - /RemoveMarkupInMessages: it makes no sense to set a goal for this, because a fixed module today might change tomorrow, introducing new strings with markup. Maybe should be set as a guideline (and the goal moved to the Expired section) - MesonPorting: should we

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-23 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:18 AM Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 06:42:07PM +, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > > I have gone ahead and contacted the > > owners of all the GNOME Goals that were more than a year old and asked > > whether they can either update

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-23 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Daniel Mustieles García wrote: Not sure about who is the owner of a Goal... anyway, I'm making some movements to close AppData al Webkit2Porting goals. Everything in core GNOME and also all tested apps have been ported already.

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-23 Thread Luis Menina
e 23/08/2017 à 13:58, Daniel Mustieles García a écrit : Not sure about who is the owner of a Goal... anyway, I'm making some movements to close AppData al Webkit2Porting goals. About /ModernAutotools and /NicerBuilds goals, I'd vote to move them to a new Deprecated section into the page, and

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-23 Thread Daniel Mustieles García
Not sure about who is the owner of a Goal... anyway, I'm making some movements to close AppData al Webkit2Porting goals. About /ModernAutotools and /NicerBuilds goals, I'd vote to move them to a new Deprecated section into the page, and move MesonPorting to he ongoing one, but this is just an

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-22 Thread Sébastien Wilmet
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:57:27AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Sriram Ramkrishna > wrote: > > Has anybody looked at the GNOME Goals[1] lately? Is this still > > something that is active? I only ask as I know at least some that seem > >

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-22 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:57 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Sriram Ramkrishna > wrote: > > Has anybody looked at the GNOME Goals[1] lately? Is this still > > something that is active? I only ask as I know at least

Re: Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-22 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: Has anybody looked at the GNOME Goals[1] lately? Is this still something that is active? I only ask as I know at least some that seem outdated to me. Most of them are outdated. I volunteered to clean this up a

Updating GNOME Goals?

2017-08-22 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
Has anybody looked at the GNOME Goals[1] lately? Is this still something that is active? I only ask as I know at least some that seem outdated to me. Two are /ModernAutotools and /NicerBuilds