While debugging an unrelated issue with printing to my HP LaserJet 1012,
I switched from the "hpcups" driver to the "hpijs" driver, and I am
**BLOWN AWAY** by the quality of its dithering. After seeing the
difference, I am absolutely appalled at how poorly the "hpcups" driver
dithers grayscales. I
** Summary changed:
- When "Activities" launch, Firefox window will occupy the big square
+ Activities overview doesn't fit the whole window in when shrinking
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Not the entire Firefox window area is placed in the "Activities".
вт, 2 июл. 2019 г., 4:55 Daniel van Vugt
:
> Can you please explain in more detail what the bug is here?
>
> ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification
Performance of Ubuntu 19.04 is some better, but sometimes (according to
increasing of processes) it freezes too. So optimization is need.
пн, 17 июн. 2019 г., 9:50 Daniel van Vugt
:
> Note that not all performance improvements will ever make it into Ubuntu
> 18.04.
>
> If you want higher
Yes please...
apport-cli --hanging -P PID
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834984
Title:
gnome-shell freezes with 100% CPU when closing popup window
Status in
That command gives me "apport-cli: error: -u/--update-bug option cannot
be used together with options for a new report".
Should I omit the -u option and create a new bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in
[Expired for chromium-browser (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in
[Expired for firefox (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
[Expired for firefox (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
[Expired for chromium-browser (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in
[Expired for totem (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu.
[Expired for thunderbird (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
[Expired for totem (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: totem (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu.
[Expired for libreoffice (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
[Expired for libreoffice (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
[Expired for libreoffice (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
** Summary changed:
- GNOME Shell hangs when closing a dialog in CLion; hung in g_private_get()
from thread_memory_from_self() from g_slice_free_chain_with_offset() from
g_list_free() from stack_do_window_deletions() from stack_ensure_sorted() from
get_default_focus_window()
+ GNOME Shell
Thanks for the bug report. I am fairly confident this will be a
duplicate of bug 1834583, but just to verify please run:
apport-cli --hanging -u 1834984 -P PID
where PID is the process ID of the busy gnome-shell.
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You
Public bug reported:
Whenever I run Netbeans 11 (using either openjdk11) and (eg):
1. Open Tools / Plugins.
2. Go to Settings.
3. Click on 'Add'.
4. Click 'Cancel'.
then gnome-shell freezes (except for the mouse), apparently indefinitely
(I have left it for 30+ minutes.)
I can login as another
Possibly related:
b'org.gnome.shell' b'enabled-extensions' b"['grava...@jr.rlabs.io',
'mediapla...@patapon.info', 'ubuntu-d...@ubuntu.com',
'appindicatorsupp...@rgcjonas.gmail.com', 'ubuntu-
appindicat...@ubuntu.com', 'mpris22playerindica...@redsoxfan.cz.cc']"
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Summary changed:
- Gnome Shell performance decreases as the number of running apps increases
+ Icon spring animation performs worse and skips frames if there are windows
open
--
You received this bug notification
Can you please explain in more detail what the bug is here?
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
** Tags added: fixed-in-3.33.4 fixed-upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831161
Title:
App-switcher icons too small with hidpi monitor and 1.25 scaling
Comment on attachment 8956311
Bug 440908 - Convert sticky prefs in default pref files to the new syntax.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225186/#review231216
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
> Looking forward to see the patch landed as we use it at Fedora.
For what purpose? user.js shouldn't be used for anything mission
critical at all.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
(In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] from comment #46)
> The preferences code is being heavily refactored, and this needs to wait a
> bit for things to settle first. That being said, I do think the ideal timing
> for this would be to get it into 60. Nick, what do you think?
If things go well with
Comment on attachment 8956310
Bug 440908 - Add support for `sticky` and `locked` attributes to default prefs.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225184/#review231212
::: modules/libpref/Preferences.cpp:3982
(Diff revision 1)
> -Preferences::GetCString(kChannelPref, updateChannelPrefValue,
> -
Comment on attachment 8956309
Bug 440908 - Remove gIsAnyPrefLocked.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225182/#review231210
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844
Created attachment 8956309
Bug 440908 - Remove gIsAnyPrefLocked.
It optimizes Preferences::IsLocked(), but that function is called fewer than
200 times while starting the browser and opening a range of tabs.
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225182/diff/#index_header
See other
Created attachment 8956310
Bug 440908 - Add support for `sticky` and `locked` attributes to default prefs.
Sticky prefs are already specifiable with `sticky_pref`, but this is a more
general attribute mechanism. The ability to specify a locked pref in the data
file is new.
The patch also adds
The ability to lock prefs at the .js level is not *only* for enterprise
customization. Specifically, we have many "prefs" that are meant to
allow e.g. per channel (release, beta, nightly) tweaks but are not meant
for users to change. There are multiple such footguns that would be
avoided by having
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #976334
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=976334
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1428920
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1428920
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/edb57fbc6beac233b12486fa7d7381220339de0f
Bug 440908 - Remove gIsAnyPrefLocked. r=glandium
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/b82802657783b6188e320ba966183ae1eedabf62
Bug 440908 - Add support for `sticky` and `locked`
user.js was never intended to be an enterprise level feature for
configuration of Firefox. I don't recommend using it for that.
For enterprise configuration, we have provided Autoconfig since day one,
and we are working on a better solution involving JSON, GPO and possibly
authors.
Our goal is
Created attachment 8956311
Bug 440908 - Convert sticky prefs in default pref files to the new syntax.
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225186/diff/#index_header
See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/225186/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/edb57fbc6bea
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/b82802657783
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d1d9ef8f7c0e
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in
I was only referring to the use of user.js for enterprise. I do
understand that it's worthwhile to have locking of prefs in JS file for
Firefox purposes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
> clang-format changed its mind, I guess?
No, chutten changed that code in bug 1435753. I generally run `./mach
clang-format -p modules/libpref`. Perhaps I should just run `./mach
clang-format` instead...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
@glandium
I see Comment #46 speaks of a FF 60 ESR release; but effort expended to
a continuation '.js' amendments to configurations appears to conflict
with the the '.json' configuration management direction outlined for 60
as well, at:
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/EnterprisePolicies
(In reply to Mike Hommey [:glandium] (VAC: 31 Dec - 11 Jan) from comment #32)
> The syntax is a triviality of the patch. The core problem here is that
> there's no one to review the patch so that it possibly lands.
Can I help review?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
The syntax is a triviality of the patch. The core problem here is that
there's no one to review the patch so that it possibly lands.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
This bug seems to be stalled
Is there anything I may do to help get it advanced?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844
Title:
lockpref not honored in
It's not the same syntax, that's my point.
pref() in a prefs.js file is NOT the same as pref() in an AutoConfig.js
file.
pref() in prefs.js sets the default pref, defaultPref() in an Autoconfig
sets a default pref.
user_pref() in prefs.js sets a user pref, pref() in an AutoConfig file
sets a
>From a quick glance at the history of the patch in Debian, in the past 5
years, I had to do actual but trivial code changes twice, and adapt to
context changes twice (one of them having been the change from PRBool to
bool)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
To expound on what :glandium said:
Extensions can lock preferences with:
Components.classes["@mozilla.org/preferences-service;1"]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsIPrefService)
.getBranch(null)
.lockPref("name_of_pref");
Locking a preference doesn't
(In reply to Benjamin Smedberg [:bsmedberg] from comment #36)
> Comment on attachment 8613433
> Allow .js preference files to set locked prefs with lockPref()
>
> Because this came up on the mailing list, I'll try to be explicit about the
> decision here. I don't think we should allow extensions
Comment on attachment 8931547
Bug 440908 - Allow preference files to set locked prefs.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/202672/#review208008
As per our IRC discussion, I think this is a good feature, and the patch
does a good job of implementing it. But before doing this I'd like to
officially
(In reply to Mike Kaply [:mkaply] from comment #30)
> It's not the same syntax, that's my point.
I tend to agree here. I think this could be a useful patch (I'd use it
instead of doing autoconfig stuff) but it's kind of silly to be hung up
on naming...
I do think that "lockPref" sticks out
Comment on attachment 8613433
Allow .js preference files to set locked prefs with lockPref()
>From b8015e0754742650a4877de9ebe7d6db2671970d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Mike Hommey
>Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:48:46 +0200
>Subject: [PATCH] Allow .js preference files to set locked prefs with
>
You didn't address my comments.
I really don't want it being called lockPref. That will confuse it with
the autoconfig "lockPref" function.
There is already enough confusion with pref()
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
(In reply to Mike Kaply [:mkaply] from comment #39)
> Oddly, this document:
>
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Preferences/
> A_brief_guide_to_Mozilla_preferences
>
> Says we already support lockPref in JS files?
It says: "All preferences files may call pref(), user_pref() and
Created attachment 8613433
Allow .js preference files to set locked prefs with lockPref()
Refreshed after bug 1098343. Benjamin, would you like to review this,
this time, considering comment 26?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
Comment on attachment 8613433
Allow .js preference files to set locked prefs with lockPref()
Because this came up on the mailing list, I'll try to be explicit about
the decision here. I don't think we should allow extensions to lock
preferences, and we don't even have a clear description (other
The preferences code is being heavily refactored, and this needs to wait
a bit for things to settle first. That being said, I do think the ideal
timing for this would be to get it into 60. Nick, what do you think?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
(In reply to Benjamin Smedberg [:bsmedberg] from comment #36)
> Because this came up on the mailing list
Which mailing list is that? (just so I can make sure I'm following the
right one)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
Looking forward to see the patch landed as we use it at Fedora.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623844
Title:
lockpref not honored in
:(
Ideally, I'd like to favor this patch over the one I proposed at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=976334 - since it has been
tried and tested for so long...and that just adds another use case for
this: ease of locking preferences for android distributions (which
aren't as
(In reply to Mike Hommey (VAC: 31 Dec - 11 Jan) [:glandium] from comment #40)
> (In reply to Mike Kaply [:mkaply] from comment #39)
> > Oddly, this document:
> >
> > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Preferences/
> > A_brief_guide_to_Mozilla_preferences
> >
> > Says we already
(In reply to Mike Kaply [:mkaply] from comment #28)
> I really don't want it being called lockPref. That will confuse it with the
> autoconfig "lockPref" function.
What is confusing? It's the same syntax. The only difference aiui, is
the execution environment, which means autoconf can do more
Created attachment 8931547
Bug 440908 - Allow preference files to set locked prefs.
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/202672/diff/#index_header
See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/202672/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
** Changed in: gnome-shell
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831161
Title:
App-switcher icons too small with hidpi monitor and
@vanvugt the fix was already merged upstream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831161
Title:
App-switcher icons too small with hidpi monitor and 1.25 scaling
Thank you for your bug report, could you include a 'journalctl -b 0' log
after getting the issue?
** Changed in: network-manager-openvpn (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: network-manager-openvpn (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834583
Title:
GNOME Shell hangs when closing a dialog in
** Tags added: packaging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805019
Title:
Please stop building firefox-testsuite
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Bug
** Tags added: eoan packaging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834866
Title:
Stop building and remove firefox-globalmenu
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
I confirm that the packages in the proposed PPA allow to scan with a Brother
MFC-440CN (brscan2).
I tried booting directly from a bionic USB stick and followed the steps listed
on comment #232 (except adding a libsane rule, which is not needed in my case)
and additionally installed
This is still an issue on Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS. I can reliably get it to happen.
Need to run killall to get it to stop trying with large transfers. The [x] to
stop file operations will not work all the time once it hangs.
The terminal and windows dualboot work fine for transferring the same
Sometimes, but more rarely I have problems with performance of gnome-
shell if I use Ubuntu 19.04. It depends of number of opened apps.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Details in my screenshot: https://photos.app.goo.gl/BR6H56eug7JFMGU37
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: gnome-shell 3.32.2-2ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-17.18-generic 5.0.8
Uname: Linux 5.0.0-17-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu3
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1827842 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827842
Great, thanks for testing!
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1827842
pulseaudio should not load module-x11-bell in gnome-shell
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Jul 1 19:23:17 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-07-01 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Alpha amd64 (201907
In a new installation of EOAN it's not possible to install gnome extensions in
Chromium.
You get this error message
"Although GNOME Shell integration extension is running, native host connector
is not detected." Refer documentation for instructions about installing
connector."
The method
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
I made a new attempt with bionic, and yes!!
@renbag: You were absolutely correct, and it's brscan2 that requires the
presence of libusb-0.1-4. I think this explains it:
$ ldd /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-brother2.so.1.0.7 | grep libusb
libusb-0.1.so.4 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libusb-0.1.so.4
Sorry, I'm not sure what to remove. My file is slightly different from
the one in that commit. Is it OK to comment out everything at /usr/bin
/start-pulseaudio-x11? There are other if blocks that don't seem to be
related.
I will try to comment out only the if block that references `bell.ogg`
and
All right, that fixes it. Now I have the expected behavior. Only one
sound plays: the one selected through GNOME Settings.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
GNOME Terminal 3.33.3 (VTE 0.57.3) implements BiDi support, according to
the proposal at https://terminal-wg.pages.freedesktop.org/bidi/ .
In alignment with Diego's comments and my responses to them, it
implements multiple modes. Shuffling the characters according to the
BiDi algorithm is enabled
** Changed in: gnome-calculator
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-calculator in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800284
Title:
digit transformed into exponent if
** Changed in: gnome-calculator
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-calculator in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803364
Title:
Ambiguous unit descriptions (i18n)
The bug has been fixed in the current version
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calculator/issues #91
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calculator/issues/91
** Also affects: gnome-calculator via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calculator/issues/91
Importance:
3.32 is in Ubuntu now
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calculator/issues #84
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calculator/issues/84
** Also affects: gnome-calculator via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calculator/issues/84
Importance: Unknown
Status:
Public bug reported:
firefox-globalmenu is an empty transitional package that was needed on
Ubuntu 14.04. Now that trusty is EOL, it can be safely removed (see
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-
trunk.head/view/head:/debian/control.in#L132).
** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
** Branch linked: lp:~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-beta.xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805019
Title:
Please stop building firefox-testsuite
Status in firefox
Hello Gunnar, or anyone else affected,
Accepted language-selector into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-
selector/0.188.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
** Branch linked: lp:~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-beta.xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831204
Title:
Package geckodriver
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
** Branch linked: lp:~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-beta.xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831454
Title:
Port chromium-browser's autopkgtests to firefox
Status in
Hello Gunnar, or anyone else affected,
Accepted fonts-noto-cjk into bionic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-
cjk/1:20190409+repack1-0ubuntu0.18.04 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by
** Branch linked: lp:~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-beta.bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831204
Title:
Package geckodriver
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
** Branch linked: lp:~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-beta.bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805019
Title:
Please stop building firefox-testsuite
Status in firefox
** Branch linked: lp:~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-beta.bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831454
Title:
Port chromium-browser's autopkgtests to firefox
Status in
Hello Gunnar, or anyone else affected,
Accepted language-selector into disco-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-
selector/0.194.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
** Branch linked: lp:~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-beta.cosmic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805019
Title:
Please stop building firefox-testsuite
Status in firefox
Hello Gunnar, or anyone else affected,
Accepted fonts-noto-cjk into disco-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-
cjk/1:20190409+repack1-0ubuntu0.19.04 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by
** Branch linked: lp:~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-beta.cosmic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831204
Title:
Package geckodriver
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
** Branch linked: lp:~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-beta.cosmic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831454
Title:
Port chromium-browser's autopkgtests to firefox
Status in
Note to other SRU members: since this upload is generally impossible to
review, what I did is check if the binaries are matching what's in eoan
and if the binaries are matching the contents from the upstream tarball.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Launchpad has imported 32 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1268599.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
** Changed in: nvidia-prime (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-prime in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824282
Title:
Add a mode that load nvidia.ko only so that we
UA:"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:46.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/46.0
SeaMonkey/2.43a1"
ID:20160101003002 en-US
c-c:ca2c0fd7c80d758f98954ca7789cb59b3f8ad2d1
m-c:22f51211915bf7daff076180847a7140d35aa353
Both KDE and Gnome libraries present on the system. The X11 login screen
is presented by
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
