** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057996
Title:
ubuntu-24.04 version:
Public bug reported:
flatpak fails autopkgtest like so:
1125s Updating appstream branch
1125s Updating summary
1125s ok app with mismatched metadata (in summary) can't be installed
1125s test-metadata-validation.sh:158 - app with mismatched
metadata (in summary) can't be
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057996
Title:
ubuntu-24.04 version:
aborted)
166 - absl_notification_test (Failed)
167 - absl_per_thread_sem_test (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
make[2]: *** [Makefile:74: test] Error 8
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
** Affects: abseil (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Dan Bungert (dbungert
Hi Kai-Heng,
It looks like you're working on this through Salsa. The debdiffs on
this bug mean that this shows in the sponsor queue, so I'm removing
Ubuntu Sponsors from this bug since there looks like no action to take
for Sponsors. Please re-subscribe Sponsors if you feel otherwise.
Thanks!
Uploaded, thanks!
** Changed in: cracklib2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cracklib2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045290
Title:
cracklib2 FTBFS against
** Changed in: cracklib2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cracklib2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045290
Title:
cracklib2 FTBFS against pyt
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
I'm unsubscribing sponsors for the moment, when you are content with the
results on noble please provide a modified debdiff with a SRU-friendly
version number for mantic and subscribe sponsors again. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
.
Uploading for noble.
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You
** Also affects: modemmanager (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: modemmanager (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.
* This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.
* This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.
* This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
- * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
-ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
-applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.
+ * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
+
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.
* This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
+ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
+applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.
+
+ * This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.
+
Seb reviewed and +1ed on IRC. Uploaded.
** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
Proposed changes to avoid the event storm
** Patch added: "udisks2-1_2.10.1-1_2.10.1-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks2/+bug/2037569/+attachment/5705929/+files/udisks2-1_2.10.1-1_2.10.1-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
proposal 4. set ID_PART_TABLE_TYPE in the appropriate spot
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libblockdev in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037569
Title:
udev issues with mantic beta
Status in Ubuntu on IBM z
after exploring udisks2/libblockdev/libfdisk, I have three possible proposals
for resolution:
1. hack udisks2 udisks_linux_partition_table_update
* calling bd_part_get_disk_spec is always going to be a loop, unless
* watches have been inhibited
* or calling bd_part_get_disk_spec
Marking invalid in systemd, other than long-standing udev rules being
involved I'm not sure this will be fixed in systemd.
Exploring if libblockdev with the s390 plugin enabled helps.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Also affects: libblockdev (Ubuntu)
In function udisks_linux_partition_table_update
if num_parts > 0,
no ID_PART_TABLE_TYPE is present,
and bd_part_get_disk_spec fails to get the disk information including part_type,
this function will fail.
Also, because libblockdev uses libfdisk in a manner that opens the disk RW,
that causes
seed MP merged, dput of ubuntu-meta done.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
Spent some time analyzing this.
Frank loaned me a test system. The test system in the "idle" state is
enough to see the issue, with a persistent load of 3+ when nothing is
happening except event loop spin. The test system is using a dasd as
the disk that it is running from.
With some udev
** Also affects: udisks2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to udisks2 in Ubuntu.
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~dbungert/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/452156
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037425
Title:
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Mantic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubunt
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-drivers-common in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978890
Title:
FIPS/OEM installation
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034967
Title:
cloud-init & cloud-guest-utils are installed on
** Also affects: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to plymouth in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033533
Title:
installing with lvm and encryption
Linked MP sponsored.
** Changed in: nvidia-prime (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
** Changed in: nvidia-prime (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: nvidia-prime (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received
Upstream PR:
https://github.com/tseliot/nvidia-prime/issues/25
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~gary-wzl77/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-prime/+git/nvidia-prime/+merge/434959
** Bug watch added: github.com/tseliot/nvidia-prime/issues #25
Thanks, uploaded!
** Changed in: openbox (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2011751
Title:
openbox crashed with
Thanks for the patch, Aaron. I'm able to reproduce this bug using the
firefox f11 -> open link in new window, when using the live session of
the daily-live lubuntu iso. And the attached patch does seem to help.
Overall the patch is what I was hoping to see, but I will request some
changes.
*
Partial review of the patch so far. I haven't read much openbox code so
take this with a grain of salt.
https://bugzilla.icculus.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6669#c9 mentions a concern
that itPrev may still be pointing to invalid data. I share this
concern. I think some interesting testcases are what
Curtin is not the appropriate place to land fixes or even quirk
workarounds for this problem. I would appreciate if you avoided adding
uninvolved components to the bug, especially when it has already been
pointed out that this is the wrong spot.
The linked threads you mention do not appear to me
** Changed in: curtin (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gsettings-desktop-schemas in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956102
Title:
Time for the US is shown in 24h format.
Curtin (no "a") doesn't manage time settings, so the fix definitely
isn't going there.
Comment #4 though makes this sound like it needs to be in the image, and
isn't installer specific? Or can you clarify what you'd like the
installer to do here?
** Changed in: curtain (Ubuntu)
Status:
Thanks for the report, Mike.
Indeed testing the Flutterstaller ISO in a VM is a bit crashy right now.
I've changed the package since this particular crash doesn't seem
Subiquity related.
** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-qxl (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in:
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libvpx in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993867
Title:
Telegram sometimes start endless use 100% CPU
Status in libvpx package in
Thanks for the report.
> do you think this bug will be corrected soon ? or i change parent
directory name of mountpoints ?
Probably better off changing the parent directory name, I'm afraid.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964036
Title:
Firefox icon missing from panel
Is there a future where we can remove this warning?
The version of Subiquity on Jammy has some differences in the driver screen, so
that's done here.
https://github.com/canonical/subiquity/pull/1369
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received
https://github.com/canonical/subiquity/pull/1358
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Pa
That is going to be a really hard label to write.
Not in terms of the code change, that's the easy part, how does one explain to
end users that some GRUB_FLAVOUR_ORDER kernels are OK and some aren't?
GRUB_FLAVOUR_ORDER is not a detail many users want to think about, they just
want hardware to
re Subiquity:
> Messaging should clearly indicate that installing the oem packages will make
> the environment incompatible with fips/RT kernel/ etc.
I would like to see a more precise list of these incompatibilities, as I am not
familiar with them.
Who can provide that information?
** Changed
47 matches
Mail list logo
