That's a quite old area of the code. You would be best served by just
trying to bisect it further down to the individual patch. I can't really
predict what would be causing that that far back.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed
Really we'd want to avoid this transition from subpixel AA to grayscale
on our side in the first place. But looking back, if you were using
hintnone, this might have been fixed recently by bug 1732577. Worth a
try in nightly to see if this is still a problem.
--
You received this bug notification
*** Bug 1708352 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930721
Title:
Issue after update Ubuntu on version 21. Firefox often fr
Sotaro, can you see if my vqmovun_s16 patch fixes this or not?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930982
Title:
Firefox 89: webrender breaks videos on Raspberry Pi
Statu
Comment on attachment 9226932
Bug 1714511 - use vqmovun_s16 for packing pixels. r?sotaro
### Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
* **User impact if declined**: Enabling Software-WebRender on ARM platforms can
lead to visual artifacts. Should not impact x86 platforms or non-SW-WR
configurations.
Created attachment 9226932
Bug 1714511 - use vqmovun_s16 for packing pixels. r?sotaro
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930982
Title:
Firefox 89: webrender breaks videos
The circumstantial evidence "seems like" something in the function here
(https://searchfox.org/mozilla-
central/source/gfx/wr/swgl/src/composite.h#534) is underflowing. But I
would need someone who can reliably reproduce the issue to find out
where in those math equations are actually doing so. I t
(In reply to Augustin Trancart [:autra] from comment #13)
> > I found the ugly rendering is also persistent (not just on hover) on some
> > websites
>
> Yes, one of those websites is the demo version of codimd
> (https://demo.codimd.org, in the preview pane). It is not *always* bad
> though, bu
Jonathan, seems vaguely like a layout issue? I think we have seen issues
in the path where depending on how the CSS of the site was doing things
for onhover (potentially animation/will-change related), it could route
through different AA/hinting settings somehow?
--
You received this bug notifica
9 matches
Mail list logo