On Friday 23 December 2005 13:32, John Cherry wrote:
> http://groups.osdl.org/workgroups/dtl/desktop_architects/
looks great! it's valuable to document what we're doing and keep us pointed in
a direction...
btw, i started the discussion period process for adoption of the
community/public/fd.o d
>
> I'm also worried about proposed changes to things like Mesa will have
> to go through the proper channels (Brian) and will take some
> discussion (especially new GLX extensions). These sort of
> architectural decisions are not something that everyone will go "ah
> Novell said it is okay, we'll
Hi all,
This is basically a me too response to Zacks mail,
I'm still going to do some work on the external tree as
a) Novell aren't working on EGL
b) I'm ignoring Novells contribution until it is contributed. You
can't hack on a promise (something I've attempted to do for 3 months -
I've asked d
Mike Shaver wrote:
On 21-Dec-05, at 4:19 PM, Otto Wyss wrote:
From the Linux desktop survey the most wanted application is an
Emailer. So let’s get this problem solved, a cross-platform Emailer
which is good enough to replace Outlook as the default Emailer for
the masses.
Yeah, let's g
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:02 -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> with the merge in February, will development on the next iteration be open or
> closed? e.g. is this going to be a code dump or something more useful in the
> long term?
Total merge, long term useful. One tree to rule them all, etc.
Na
On Friday 23 December 2005 09:33, Nat Friedman wrote:
> As for the future, David has been planning to clean up what he's working
> on now and get it in a functional/mergeable state. The plan is to get
> it working and merged as soon as possible, but he's shooting
> specifically for XDevConf, which
http://groups.osdl.org/workgroups/dtl/desktop_architects/
Hopefully, this page will be a useful resource to you as you work with
other organizations within the Linux desktop community. This site is a
reference for...
* Organizations represented by the desktop architects
* Meeting sum
On Friday 23 December 2005 09:33, Nat Friedman wrote:
> For the first 10 or 12 months of development, there was no material
> outside contribution to Xgl.
...
> largely functional state as fast as possible, without external drag.
so nobody was contributing to it (really implying nobo
On Friday 23 December 2005 17:33, Nat Friedman wrote:
> We'd like to make a splash with something that is largely functional.
> That way, the world will take notice of Xgl in a big way and Novell
> can get some credit for having been by far the principle sponsor of
> this development for more than
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 03:31 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/165205/
Hey,
We have been sponsoring Xgl development here at Novell. David Reveman
has been devoting a large portion of his time to Xgl for the last
fifteen months or so. As far as I know, we are the only company (ie
10 matches
Mail list logo
