On 10/14/06, Mike Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why can some companies do this and Adobe not?Adobe *could* do it, but they don't want to because it's extremely
unpleasant and annoying.
I don't want to do the unpleasant things in my job either but they have to be done.
How did they start on
On 10/13/06, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what so many linux users + developers seem to forget is that there aresets of products that do *NOT* want to be distributed by distributions.
how would a commercial product ever be a part of the multiplicity oflinux package management systems? its
On 10/13/06, Segedunum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I mean, even if Adobe do create a
> Linux desktop port, how does Adobe package it up and how on Earth is anyone
> going to install it? Anybody think of things like that?
Why can some companies do this and Adobe not?
What do they need? An "install
On 10/12/06, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But my summary was this: It takes a lot of hard work to create a Desktop product for Linux
It doesn't and it has been proven a dozen of times.
Of course, if you expect the full blown professional version of Photoshop to be ported in under a
