Re: Git Push Summary

2014-03-03 Thread Christopher
Yeah, I guess I was just confused, because I expected the hash provided in the message to point to the HEAD commit in the tag, not something specific to the tag's own blob. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:04 PM, John Vines wrote: > Deleting the rc

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-03-03 Thread John Vines
Deleting the rc tag? On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Christopher wrote: > Nevermind and disregard. I'm mistaken. We voted on 3478f71a as > 1.5.1-rc3... this tag is correct. > > However, I am confused about the previous push delete: > "Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1-rc3 [deleted] c485b41f7" > >

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-03-03 Thread Christopher
Nevermind and disregard. I'm mistaken. We voted on 3478f71a as 1.5.1-rc3... this tag is correct. However, I am confused about the previous push delete: "Updated Tags: refs/tags/1.5.1-rc3 [deleted] c485b41f7" -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:27 PM,

Re: Git Push Summary

2014-03-03 Thread Christopher
This does not look correct. The 1.5.1 tag should have been the GPG signed one that Josh was going to create from the 1.5.1-rc3 (c485b41f7). This is a different SHA1 entirely. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:42 PM, wrote: > Repository: accumulo >

Re: Review Request 18444: ACCUMULO-2399 Alert user CI table should exist

2014-03-03 Thread Mike Drob
> On Feb. 25, 2014, 9:22 p.m., Sean Busbey wrote: > > src/server/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/test/continuous/ContinuousIngest.java, > > lines 153-155 > > > > > > Can we include the table name in the error

Review Request 18705: ACCUMULO-2233 Get ranges from cloned table

2014-03-03 Thread Mike Drob
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18705/ --- Review request for accumulo and Sean Busbey. Bugs: ACCUMULO-2233 https://is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.5.1-RC3

2014-03-03 Thread Mike Drob
I went ahead and marked 1.5.1 as released in JIRA. Team effort! On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Christopher wrote: > If you can go ahead and promote the staging repo and create the signed > tag in git, somebody else can upload the artifacts to the dist repo, > so they can be distributed to the

Re: Review Request 18444: ACCUMULO-2399 Alert user CI table should exist

2014-03-03 Thread Bill Havanki
> On Feb. 25, 2014, 4:22 p.m., Sean Busbey wrote: > > src/server/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/test/continuous/ContinuousIngest.java, > > lines 153-155 > > > > > > Can we include the table name in the error