Rescinding my -1 vote. Josh helped me figure this one out on IRC. There
used to be a tag named 1.6.1-rc1. That no longer exists at apache repo,
now there is a branch called 1.6.1-rc. I had both the old tag and the new
branch, git was taking the tag. git fetch --prune did not remove the tag,
I
Accumulo server logs are ~118M. The CI logs are tiny. Hadoop logs I have
are around 126M (although probably relevant bits are much smaller).
Sadly, I didn't run with archived WALs, so I'm not sure how useful the
server logs are on their own.
Sean Busbey wrote:
Josh, how big are all the
+1
I did a little more poking at 1.6.1 and it looks good. Thanks Corey and
Josh for putting these releases together.
Sigs and hashes for bin.tar.gz and src.tar.gz look good
Successfully ran mutslam[1] against 1.6.1 rc1, using staging repo.
Ci w/ Agitation verify ran successfully. Env hadoop
Bill,
I've been having that same IT issue and said the same thing It's not
happening to others. I lifted the timeout completely and it never finished.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Mike Drob mad...@cloudera.com wrote:
Any chance the IRC chats can make it only the ML for posterity?
Mike
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/16#discussion_r17987075
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/client/admin/TableOperations.java
---
@@ -103,6 +103,25 @@
void create(String tableName,
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/16#discussion_r17987372
--- Diff: test/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/test/VolumeChooserIT.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,670 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/16#discussion_r17987487
--- Diff: test/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/test/VolumeChooserIT.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,670 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/16#discussion_r17987756
--- Diff:
server/base/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/fs/VolumeChooser.java ---
@@ -18,5 +18,7 @@
public interface
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/16#discussion_r17987986
--- Diff:
server/base/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/fs/VolumeManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -560,8 +565,22 @@ public ContentSummary
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/16#discussion_r17988361
--- Diff: test/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/test/VolumeChooserIT.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,670 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/16#discussion_r17989515
--- Diff:
server/base/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/fs/GeneralVolumeChooser.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/16#discussion_r17989615
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/client/admin/TableOperations.java
---
@@ -103,6 +103,25 @@
void create(String tableName,
Devs,
Github integration is nice... but, I'm not a fan of how comments on diffs
are posted to the JIRAs. Each line note is a separate comment and it
includes a ton of irrelevant diff output. Looking at ACCUMULO-3089 is what
triggered this reaction for me.
Does anybody else have thoughts on this?
I was thinking about this... and I was wondering if this is done by the ASF
integration could batch these comments for mailing to the dev list and/or
commenting on JIRA. I really like using GitHub for reviews/comments.
Issuing pull requests is very seamless, but the comment activity is a bit
14 matches
Mail list logo
