[GitHub] accumulo pull request: [ACCUMULO-4147] - Add Accumulo Namespace Op...

Github user tristeng commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/74#issuecomment-189065742 Added in IT tests for the new functions, but ran into an interesting error and am hoping you all can provide me with some insight. I've added the following test into

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.1-rc2

(re-sending with [RESULT] in subject) Christopher wrote: Vote passed with +6, -0 Please double check the release notes and contribute any fixes/updates as you have time, as I try to wrap up the rest of the release tasks. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 4:41 PM Christopher wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.1-rc2

Vote passed with +6, -0 Please double check the release notes and contribute any fixes/updates as you have time, as I try to wrap up the rest of the release tasks. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 4:41 PM Christopher wrote: > For what it's worth, I updated ACCUMULO-4150 to reflect

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.1-rc2

For what it's worth, I updated ACCUMULO-4150 to reflect the fact that I finally got the tests to pass with a newer version of Hadoop, so I'm satisfied now. :) That was really bugging me. My +1 stands. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:34 PM Christopher wrote: > Oh, yes, apologies

[GitHub] accumulo pull request: [ACCUMULO-4147] - Add Accumulo Namespace Op...

Github user tristeng commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/74#issuecomment-188987996 Whoops! Didn't even see those...was only looking under the accumulo-proxy project. Yup, will do. I'll also add in my Python IT file into the proxy/examples/python

[GitHub] accumulo pull request: [ACCUMULO-4147] - Add Accumulo Namespace Op...

Github user keith-turner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/74#issuecomment-188983450 @tristeng the proxy has fairly comprehensive ITs that excercise most of its API. There are located in

[GitHub] accumulo pull request: [ACCUMULO-4147] - Add Accumulo Namespace Op...

GitHub user tristeng opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/74 [ACCUMULO-4147] - Add Accumulo Namespace Operations to Proxy I've updated the the Accumulo Proxy to support namespace operations (including the security operations). I have tested all the new

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.1-rc2

Oh, yes, apologies if I gave that impression. I'm sure we'll figure this out, and if it is a problem in Accumulo's Kerberos feature (and not something stupid on my end), I'm sure we're committed to fixing it quickly and having it in the next bugfix release. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:31 PM Josh

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.1-rc2

Thanks. I've been doing a bit with the Kerberos stuff (in real environments) and what is in 1.7.1 seems pretty solid to me. I just wanted to make sure people didn't avoid it, thinking that it was not stable. Christopher wrote: Yeah, that's fine. I'll just reserve judgement for now, and defer

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.1-rc2

Yeah, that's fine. I'll just reserve judgement for now, and defer to others, since I don't have time to set up a separate Kerberos environment. As far as I can tell, the feature works fine, up to a point. I'm just not sure what to make of this particular test. As you said, though, it's quite

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.1-rc2

+1 Ran 3 long test on EC2. The env for all 3 test was : Centos 7, JDK 8, Hadoop 2.6.3, ZK 3.4.6, 1 m3.xlarge leader and 8 d2.xlarge workers * 24 hr run of CI w/o agitation on EC2. XXB entries verified. Saw performance issues outlined in comment on ACCUMULO-4146[1]. Info about # of entries

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.1-rc2

Welcome to why people say "Kerberos is hard". I think I said in chat, but increasing the timeout factor is not going to make that test pass if it can't pass the first time. The MiniKDC the tests use are not representative of a real KDC. I'd ask that you deploy Accumulo with Kerberos before

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.1-rc2

I'm going to +1 myself, but with a reservation: I had a lot of difficulty getting the Kerberos ITs to pass without timing out. I was never able to get the KerberosRenewalIT to pass, even after re-running several times (still trying), and even with a timeout factor of 20. I do not have a strong

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.1-rc2

+1 * verify signatures / checksums * verified LICENSE/NOTICE * source artifact corresponds to referenced commit * source builds correctly with Oracle JDK 1.7.0_75 / Apache Maven 3.2.2 (couple of transient timeouts in ITs) On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Christopher wrote:

Re: Review Request 43957: ACCUMULO-1755: removed synchronized modifier from TabletServerBatchWriterstartProcessing()

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43957/#review120584 ---

Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.7.1-rc2

+ 1 * verified checksums and sigs * ran accumulo from the 1.7.1 bin download on my laptop * built from 1.7.1 src download - unit tests and package * ran -Psunny integration tests - a trace test on ShellServerIT was funky, but I think it is due to unfortunate timing, not an actual error On