Yes, I believe so. Good point.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016, 00:15 Mike Drob wrote:
> The ITs pass on certain Java versions, right? We can doc that and iterate
> from there.
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:09 PM Christopher wrote:
>
> > Yeah, me either... but it does raise the question: if we can't provide
The ITs pass on certain Java versions, right? We can doc that and iterate
from there.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:09 PM Christopher wrote:
> Yeah, me either... but it does raise the question: if we can't provide
> proper Kerberos support (ITs don't even pass, IIRC) using a dependency
> older than 2
Github user madrob commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/106
I'm looking at branching after ACCUMULO-4157 makes it in, so there is still
time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Yeah, me either... but it does raise the question: if we can't provide
proper Kerberos support (ITs don't even pass, IIRC) using a dependency
older than 2.6.1, how much can we really say 1.7.2 works on those older
versions?
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:50 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> I would not feel comf
Github user madrob commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65654201
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogs.java
---
@@ -410,4 +556,41 @@ static boolean isUUID(String name) {
Github user madrob commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65654141
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogs.java
---
@@ -410,4 +556,41 @@ static boolean isUUID(String name) {
I would not feel comfortable bumping the min req Hadoop in 1.7.2
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:39 PM Christopher wrote:
> Perhaps. But the tests pass with 2.6.1, I think. Shouldn't be that much
> different in terms of support, so I figured go with the minimum we can test
> with. FWIW, this affects 1.
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65652662
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogsTest.java
---
@@ -234,4 +257,288 @@ public void testIsUUID() {
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65652304
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogsTest.java
---
@@ -234,4 +257,288 @@ public void testIsUUID() {
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65651454
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogsTest.java
---
@@ -234,4 +257,288 @@ public void testIsUUID() {
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65651340
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogsTest.java
---
@@ -234,4 +257,288 @@ public void testIsUUID() {
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65650715
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogs.java
---
@@ -170,76 +184,203 @@ boolean holdsLock(HostAndPort ad
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65649944
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogs.java
---
@@ -170,76 +184,203 @@ boolean holdsLock(HostAndPort ad
Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/108#discussion_r65627746
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/data/Value.java ---
@@ -48,6 +50,30 @@ public Value() {
}
/**
+ * Creates a
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/108#discussion_r65626882
--- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/data/Value.java ---
@@ -48,6 +50,30 @@ public Value() {
}
/**
+ * Create
Github user joshelser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/108
:+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
GitHub user keith-turner opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/108
ACCUMULO-4326 Accept Text and CharSeq in Value
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/keith-turner/accumulo ACCUMULO-4326
Alter
Well, I wouldn't be surprised with some issues across a fedup (which is a
way to do an upgrade between Fedora versions), but it should have been
stable with normal/routine yum/dnf upgrades.
Were you using the Fedora-provided packages, or the BigTop ones? Or another
set?
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:0
This may not be directly related but I've noticed Hadoop packages have been
not uninstalling/updating well the past year or so. The last couple times
I've run fedup, I've had to go back in manually and remove/update a bunch
of the Hadoop packages like Zookeeper and Parquet.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at
That first post was intended for the Fedora developer list. Apologies for
sending to the wrong list.
If anybody is curious, it seems the Fedora community support around Hadoop
and Big Data is really dying... the packager for Flume and HTrace has
abandoned their efforts to package for Fedora, and n
Sorry, wrong list.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:20 PM Christopher
wrote:
> So, it would seem at some point, without me noticing (certainly my fault,
> for not paying attention enough), the Hadoop packages got orphaned and/or
> retired? in Fedora.
>
> This is a big problem for me, because the main pa
So, it would seem at some point, without me noticing (certainly my fault,
for not paying attention enough), the Hadoop packages got orphaned and/or
retired? in Fedora.
This is a big problem for me, because the main package I work on is
dependent upon Hadoop.
What's the state of Hadoop in Fedora t
Github user mjwall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65604304
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogs.java
---
@@ -55,12 +56,16 @@
import org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperEx
Github user mjwall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65577463
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogs.java
---
@@ -55,12 +56,16 @@
import org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperEx
Github user mjwall commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107
Thanks for reviewing @joshelser
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65576260
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogs.java
---
@@ -55,12 +56,16 @@
import org.apache.zookeeper.Keepe
Github user mjwall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65575725
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogs.java
---
@@ -170,76 +175,117 @@ boolean holdsLock(HostAndPort addr) {
Github user mjwall commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65575618
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogs.java
---
@@ -55,12 +56,16 @@
import org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperEx
Github user keith-turner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/104
Merged this to 1.8. Thanks @joshelser and @dhutchis for taking a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user keith-turner closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/104
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user phrocker commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/106#discussion_r65571229
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/rfile/bcfile/Compression.java
---
@@ -81,38 +89,60 @@ public void flush() throws IOException {
Github user joshelser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107
The general approach seems to be pretty solid. The edge cases I could think
about were correctly handled (e.g. if the GC dies, the "time to wait" would be
reset and we woudn't delete the WAL too
Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65567462
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogs.java
---
@@ -170,76 +175,117 @@ boolean holdsLock(HostAndPort addr)
Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107#discussion_r65568599
--- Diff:
server/gc/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/gc/GarbageCollectWriteAheadLogs.java
---
@@ -55,12 +56,16 @@
import org.apache.zookeeper.Keepe
GitHub user mjwall opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/107
ACCUMULO-4157 Bug fix for removing WALs to quickly
Keep track of first time a tserver is seen down and only remove WALs for
that server if past configurated threshhold
Much work left to be
Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/106#discussion_r65560601
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/rfile/bcfile/Compression.java
---
@@ -81,38 +89,60 @@ public void flush() throws IOException {
Github user keith-turner closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/103
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user phrocker commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/106#discussion_r65523717
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/file/rfile/bcfile/Compression.java
---
@@ -81,38 +89,60 @@ public void flush() throws IOException {
38 matches
Mail list logo
