Github user joshelser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/199
> I think an admin should be able to define the pools and max resources in
the configuration, and then have the ability to allow users to use specific
pools or something to that effect (thinking
Github user joshelser commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/199
> Clearly I've modify the thrift calls so that we can allow scans to create
resource requests, but is this a good idea
I think I've heard that HDFS has the notion of a "resource coupon" t
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/199
@phrocker - Just thinking about multi-tenancy and competition for
resources, allowing an administrator to define upper limits, and making sure
that user operations don't trump an administrator try
Github user phrocker commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/199
@dlmarion Some of these things aren't well defined in Property.java yet as
I was worried about going in a direction and it being all wrong. I take your
comment as a 'feature request' sort of. To b
Github user dlmarion commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/199
I see in Property.java the definition of queues / pools. Are the high water
marks for the requested resources set there also? I could not tell from the PR,
but I think an admin should be able to d
Github user phrocker commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/199
Oh and tests will fail. Again, just a thought provoking PR. I like the idea
of submitting a PR to get ideas and if someone has ideas pointing to code this
is a great way for them to point it out s
GitHub user phrocker opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/199
DO NOT MERGE: PROOF OF CONCEPT
Hello this is a proof of concept that will hopefully begin the discussion
of changing how we request resources.
First of all there are a lot of changes her
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo-testing/pull/1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
+1
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> LGTM
>
>
> Billie Rinaldi wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> The Apache Accumulo PMC has decided to start drafting its quarterly board
>> reports on the dev list. Here is a draft of our report which is due on
>> Wednesday. Let me know if you have
Github user mikewalch commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo-testing/pull/1
I think that this pull request is ready to merged. Before this is merged, I
want to mention two more commits that were added to PR in case any one wants to
review:
* 45b9dbfbbcaf -
Github user mikewalch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo-testing/pull/1#discussion_r95236835
--- Diff: conf/accumulo-testing-env.sh.example ---
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+#
If you have that info, yeah I think you could.
The lifecycle of those queries is a bit strange (and, IIRC, different
depending on the execution engine Hive uses).
Experimentation is definitely the way forward :). Let me know if you
need any help -- I'm happy to at least try to help. If you co
Josh,
Thanks, it looks like If I can override the getRanges() from the
AccumuloPredicateHandler I might be able to build correct ranges based on
matching index rows.
Does this sound feasible?
Regards,
Mike Fagan
On 1/9/17, 12:38 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
Hi Mike,
As far as I unde
LGTM
Billie Rinaldi wrote:
Hello all,
The Apache Accumulo PMC has decided to start drafting its quarterly board
reports on the dev list. Here is a draft of our report which is due on
Wednesday. Let me know if you have any suggestions!
Billie
--
The Apache Accumulo sorted, distributed key/
+1
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > The Apache Accumulo PMC has decided to start drafting its quarterly board
> > reports on the dev list. Here is a draft of our report which is due on
> >
+1
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > The Apache Accumulo PMC has decided to start drafting its quarterly board
> > reports on the dev list. Here is a draft of our report which is due on
> >
Hi Mike,
As far as I understand it, the Hive storage handler APIs (which is how
the Accumulo integration is implemented) doesn't expose any ability to
do use index tables to answer some query.
This means that the only thing you can do to make queries faster, would
be to create a number of ta
+1 for a 1.8.1 and a 1.7.3 both within the next 2 weeks, if we can. I can
help.
There are a few outstanding bugs marked for 1.7.3 (59) and 1.8.1 (161), but
most of those can be punted to a future bugfix release. We don't need to
wait on them to push out an update. We just need to know people will
Thinking it is time for a 1.8.1 release. I'm happy to be the release
manager since I did the 1.8.0. Just trying to get a sense for where people
think we are.
Mike
+1
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The Apache Accumulo PMC has decided to start drafting its quarterly board
> reports on the dev list. Here is a draft of our report which is due on
> Wednesday. Let me know if you have any suggestions!
>
> Billie
>
> --
Github user lstav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/195#discussion_r95222550
--- Diff:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/TabletServer.java ---
@@ -2360,7 +2360,7 @@ public void run() {
zoo.putPersist
Hi,
I am looking to utilize an index table to avoid full table scans and speed up
hive queries against an external accumulo table.
Has anyone done this yet? Can someone point me in the right direction?
Regards,
Mike Fagan
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo-testing/pull/1#discussion_r95216302
--- Diff: README.md ---
@@ -1 +1,54 @@
# Apache Accumulo Testing Suite
+
+The Apache Accumulo testing suite contains applications tha
Github user lstav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/195#discussion_r95209902
--- Diff:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/TabletServer.java ---
@@ -2360,7 +2360,7 @@ public void run() {
zoo.putPersist
Github user lstav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/195#discussion_r95209827
--- Diff:
server/master/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/master/Master.java ---
@@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ private void getMasterLock(final String zMasterLoc)
th
Github user ctubbsii commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/195#discussion_r95208393
--- Diff:
server/master/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/master/Master.java ---
@@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ private void getMasterLock(final String zMasterLoc)
Github user ctubbsii commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/195#discussion_r95208787
--- Diff:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/TabletServer.java ---
@@ -2360,7 +2360,7 @@ public void run() {
zoo.putPers
Github user mikewalch commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo-testing/pull/1#discussion_r95201587
--- Diff: README.md ---
@@ -1 +1,54 @@
# Apache Accumulo Testing Suite
+
+The Apache Accumulo testing suite contains applications that t
Hello all,
The Apache Accumulo PMC has decided to start drafting its quarterly board
reports on the dev list. Here is a draft of our report which is due on
Wednesday. Let me know if you have any suggestions!
Billie
--
The Apache Accumulo sorted, distributed key/value store is a robust,
scala
29 matches
Mail list logo
