I think I can finish the FATE refactor PR [1] for 2.1. I had been keeping
it up to date with the latest in main but stopped because it was too much
work. I was waiting until the ZK property changes are completed before
resolving the latest conflicts. I don't think it is much of a risk. It is
mostly
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 1:11 PM Dave Marion wrote:
>
> I understand the desire to see less coupling for the optional features, but
> getting to that point for ScanServers (and less so for ExternalCompactions)
> would be a ton of work I think.
The likelihood of it being a lot of work doesn't mean i
I understand the desire to see less coupling for the optional features, but
getting to that point for ScanServers (and less so for ExternalCompactions)
would be a ton of work I think. The concern that I brought up in the "2.1
Release TODOs" thread regarding planning has not been addressed. If there
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 11:50 AM Keith Turner wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 11:17 AM Christopher wrote:
> >
> > However, I'm reluctant to include #2422, because I don't think it's near
> > ready enough, and by the time it is, it will be very last minute, and I
> > don't want to delay 2.1 furth
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 11:17 AM Christopher wrote:
>
> I haven't seen the metrics test fail very often lately. If it's stable, I
> don't mind removing the blocker on that issue, but I'd be reluctant to
> close it entirely just yet, until we can verify it doesn't happen anymore.
>
> As for the orig
I haven't seen the metrics test fail very often lately. If it's stable, I
don't mind removing the blocker on that issue, but I'd be reluctant to
close it entirely just yet, until we can verify it doesn't happen anymore.
As for the original list of potential issues to include, I'm in favor of
tryin
I think [3] is OBE and can be closed.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 9:11 AM Mike Miller wrote:
> Yes I agree, that was the goal of this email thread. I found a few more
> tickets that should be addressed for the next release.
>
> Ivan - There was some work done on this PR but it has been some time. Do
Yes I agree, that was the goal of this email thread. I found a few more
tickets that should be addressed for the next release.
Ivan - There was some work done on this PR but it has been some time. Do
you want to take a look at it? Implement a Thread limit. [1]
Keith T - I think we should get this
