Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates

gt;> >>>> For general discussion - Facebook recently (Oct 28, 2017) published a >>>> >>>>> paper on tracing: Canopy: An End-to-End Performance Tracing and >>>>> Analysis >>>>> System (https://research.fb.com/publications/canopy-end-t

Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates

y, February 27, 2018 12:57 PM To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems promising, however, potentially promising in the same way htrace was... That being said, I did a cursory thought exercise of what it w

Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates

t; "Mismatched models affected compatibility between mixed system versions; >>> e.g. Accumulo and Hadoop were impacted by the “continued lack of concern >>> in >>> the HTrace project around tracing during upgrades” >>> >>> >>> -Origina

Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates

2018 12:57 PM To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems promising, however, potentially promising in the same way htrace was... That being said, I did a cursory thought exercise of what it would take to do

Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates

gt; > the HTrace project around tracing during upgrades” > > > > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Tony Kurc [mailto:tk...@apache.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 12:57 PM > > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing

Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates

> -Original Message- > From: Tony Kurc [mailto:tk...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 12:57 PM > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates > > I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems > promising, howe

Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates

lto:tk...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 12:57 PM > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates > > I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems > promising, however, potentially promising in the same way htrace w

RE: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates

esday, February 27, 2018 12:57 PM To: dev@accumulo.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems promising, however, potentially promising in the same way htrace was... That being said, I did a cursory thought exercise of

Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates

I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems promising, however, potentially promising in the same way htrace was... That being said, I did a cursory thought exercise of what it would take to do a swap of the current tracing in accumulo to opentracing, and I didn't come across

Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates

On 2018/02/27 16:39:02, Christopher wrote: > I didn't realize HTrace was struggling in incubation. Maybe some of us can > start participating? The project did start within Accumulo, after all. What > does it need? I also wouldn't want to go back to maintaining cloudtrace.

[DISCUSS] tracing framework updates

More things we should get ahead of for Accumulo 2.0.0: distributed tracing. Right now we have an awkward situation wrt HTrace support. We're using and shipping htrace 3.1. It works okay for our internal uses, afaict. Hadoop 2.6 ships and uses HTrace 3.0. I believe this does not work with 3.1.