>>>> For general discussion - Facebook recently (Oct 28, 2017) published a
>>>>
>>>>> paper on tracing: Canopy: An End-to-End Performance Tracing and
>>>>> Analysis
>>>>> System (https://research.fb.com/publications/canopy-end-to-end
ent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 12:57 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates
I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems
promising, however, potentially promising in the same way htrace was...
That being said, I did a cursory thought exercise
>> "Mismatched models affected compatibility between mixed system versions;
>>> e.g. Accumulo and Hadoop were impacted by the “continued lack of concern
>>> in
>>> the HTrace project around tracing during upgrades”
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original
y 27, 2018 12:57 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates
I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems
promising, however, potentially promising in the same way htrace was...
That being said, I did a cursory thought exercise of what it would
oject around tracing during upgrades”
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony Kurc [mailto:tk...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 12:57 PM
> > To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates
&g
l Message-
> From: Tony Kurc [mailto:tk...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 12:57 PM
> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates
>
> I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems
> promising, however,
sage-
From: Tony Kurc [mailto:tk...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 12:57 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates
I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems promising,
however, potentially promising in the same way htra
k...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 12:57 PM
> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates
>
> I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems
> promising, however, potentially promising in the same way htrace was...
esday, February 27, 2018 12:57 PM
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] tracing framework updates
I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems promising,
however, potentially promising in the same way htrace was... That being said, I
did a cursory thought exercise of wh
I have some experience with opentracing, and it definitely seems promising,
however, potentially promising in the same way htrace was... That being
said, I did a cursory thought exercise of what it would take to do a swap
of the current tracing in accumulo to opentracing, and I didn't come across
a
On 2018/02/27 16:39:02, Christopher wrote:
> I didn't realize HTrace was struggling in incubation. Maybe some of us can
> start participating? The project did start within Accumulo, after all. What
> does it need? I also wouldn't want to go back to maintaining cloudtrace.
>
I suspect it's too
I didn't realize HTrace was struggling in incubation. Maybe some of us can
start participating? The project did start within Accumulo, after all. What
does it need? I also wouldn't want to go back to maintaining cloudtrace.
I'm unfamiliar with OpenTracing, but it was my understanding that Zipkin
w
More things we should get ahead of for Accumulo 2.0.0: distributed tracing.
Right now we have an awkward situation wrt HTrace support. We're using and
shipping htrace 3.1. It works okay for our internal uses, afaict.
Hadoop 2.6 ships and uses HTrace 3.0. I believe this does not work with 3.1.
H
13 matches
Mail list logo
