Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC4

Thanks Corey! You're the champ for working through all of these. Corey Nolet wrote: This vote has come to a close with the following result: +1: 2 -1: 1 I'll get an RC5 together. On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Keith Turner wrote: -1 because is causing mini accumulo to not run ACCUMULO-35

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC4

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Corey Nolet wrote: > This vote has come to a close with the following result: > > +1: 2 > -1: 1 > > I'll get an RC5 together. > Thanks Corey. > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > > > -1 because is causing mini accumulo to not run ACCUMULO

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC4

This vote has come to a close with the following result: +1: 2 -1: 1 I'll get an RC5 together. On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > -1 because is causing mini accumulo to not run ACCUMULO-3576 > > On the upside I made two successful 24 hr ci runs. One with agitation and > o

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC4

-1 because is causing mini accumulo to not run ACCUMULO-3576 On the upside I made two successful 24 hr ci runs. One with agitation and one without. For the one w/o agitation I ran into some hdfs issue and opened HDFS-7765. I think I ingested around ~31 billion entries. For the test run w/ agit

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC4

I'm worried about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3576 that Keith just found. Given it's impact on users, I'm thinking that we might need to RC5... Josh Elser wrote: +1 Verified hash/sigs Verified tag/sha1 Built source tarball Verified all UTs/ITs Inspected compat report Corey

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC4

I just noticed that our LICENSE and NOTICE have grown stale for the binary artifact and do not include mentions of the jetty and slf4j jars that are now being bundled (added in 1.6.1). I don't think this requires voting against this release candidate, as it's just for the binary tarball, but we sh

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC4

+1 Verified: SHA1, MD5, and GPG checksums/sigs git commit matches jar manifest entries jars match lib directory of -bin.tar.gz source and javadoc jars available for each jar rc4 branch matches sha1 and contents of -src.tar.gz Previous note about ACCUMULO-2696 and ACCUMULO-3517 missing from CHANGE

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC4

+1 Verified hash/sigs Verified tag/sha1 Built source tarball Verified all UTs/ITs Inspected compat report Corey linked Verified changes from rc3 seem to be in place. License/Notice look good Corey Nolet wrote: Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC4

24 hr CI run (w/o agitation) followed by verification was successful on 20 node EC2 cluster. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Corey Nolet wrote: > Devs, > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 > > Branch: 1.6.2-rc4 > SHA1: 0649982c2e395852ce2e4408d283a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC4

I'll add this to the release documentation as well. On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Christopher wrote: > Just a quick observation: > > The CHANGES file omits ACCUMULO-2696 and ACCUMULO-3517, which were marked > (tentatively) as fixed for 1.6.3, but actually were included in RC4. > > > -- > Chr

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC4

Just a quick observation: The CHANGES file omits ACCUMULO-2696 and ACCUMULO-3517, which were marked (tentatively) as fixed for 1.6.3, but actually were included in RC4. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Corey Nolet wrote: > Devs, > >

[VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 RC4

Devs, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.6.2 Branch: 1.6.2-rc4 SHA1: 0649982c2e395852ce2e4408d283a40d6490a980 Staging Repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1022/ Source tarball: https://repository.apache.