Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

#440 (add SHA512 sums to vote generated vote email) and #433 (bump copyright year) wraps up all these tasks. Please provide any feedback if you think additional changes need to be made to the release process. On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:01 PM Christopher wrote: > Completed all these steps, except

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

Completed all these steps, except for updating the build.sh script to include the SHA512 sums... which I'm working on. On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 7:45 PM Christopher wrote: > Post-vote steps I've completed: > > 1. svn mv from dist/dev area to dist/release > 2. Release staged Maven repository > 3. S

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

Post-vote steps I've completed: 1. svn mv from dist/dev area to dist/release 2. Release staged Maven repository 3. Sign and push git tag 4. Merge in and clean up git branches 5. Added release date to reporter.apache.org 6. Cleaned up JIRA version for 1.9.0 7. Update Jenkins jobs for 1.9 instead of

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:12 PM Sean Busbey wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Christopher wrote: > > > > > > > In response to Sean and Mike's comments, I copied the tarballs to the SVN > > dist/dev area, along with their SHA512 sums, but no votes were changed > as a > > result. I saw no

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Christopher wrote: > > > In response to Sean and Mike's comments, I copied the tarballs to the SVN > dist/dev area, along with their SHA512 sums, but no votes were changed as a > result. I saw no indication in the discussion that anybody other than > myself examin

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

Thanks for the summary Christopher, and thanks for pushing the release through. On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:02 PM Christopher wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:21 PM Michael Wall wrote: > > > Congrats. Don't forget to update the release notes with the testing > > information to include versions

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:21 PM Michael Wall wrote: > Congrats. Don't forget to update the release notes with the testing > information to include versions. I didn't realize that 1.9 would work with > Hadoop 3 but I see it in the parent pom as a profile. Also, did anything > change as result o

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

Congrats. Don't forget to update the release notes with the testing information to include versions. I didn't realize that 1.9 would work with Hadoop 3 but I see it in the parent pom as a profile. Also, did anything change as result of Sean and Mike's comments? On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:59 PM C

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

This vote passes with: 6*(+1) + 1*(-0) + 1*(-1) +1: edcoleman, mwalch, jmark99, ctubbsii, kturner, mmiller -0: mdrob -1: busbey Thanks for the votes all, I'll start working on the post-vote steps next. It looks like folks are still making updates to the release notes. On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:4

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

+1 * Verified SVN staging area (dist/dev/accumulo/1.9.0-rc1) tarballs match Nexus staging area (artifacts and GPG sigs) and SHA512s there are correct. * Ran mvn verify -DskipTests with both Hadoop 2 and Hadoop 3 * Ran all ITs successfully with Hadoop 2 * GPG signatures match release tarball artifa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

+1 Ran randomwalk "All.xml" tests across 7 walkers and 1 leader EC2 cluster for almost 48 hours. No problems seen other than a false positive with the test that is fixed in PR #429 On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Keith Turner wrote: > +1 > > * Su

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

+1 * Successfully built Fluo against RC * Ran continuous ingest for 24hrs on 9 node cluster using RC. Verified successfully. Table had 32.3 billion entries after test. On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Christopher wrote: > Accumulo Developers, > > Please consider the following candidate for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

I started continuous ingest running on a 9 node EC2 cluster this morning. I plan to let ingest run for ~24hrs and then run verify. I will not know the results of this for ~2 days. On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Christopher wrote: > Accumulo Developers, > > Please consider the following candida

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:30 PM Sean Busbey wrote: > > > On 2018/04/16 01:26:54, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > > > > On 2018/04/15 21:39:04, Christopher wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:11 AM Sean Busbey > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > However, I can't verify that the source artifact or any oth

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

On 2018/04/16 01:26:54, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > On 2018/04/15 21:39:04, Christopher wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:11 AM Sean Busbey wrote: > > > > > > > However, I can't verify that the source artifact or any other artifacts > > > that we'll eventually place in dist.a.o/release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

Does "strongly against" in this case mean "-1" or still "-0" ? On 2018/04/15 17:24:33, Mike Drob wrote: > I am strongly against generating and publishing checksum information after > a vote because that ostensibly means it hasn't been verified and voted on. > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 12:35 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

On 2018/04/15 21:39:04, Christopher wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:11 AM Sean Busbey wrote: > > > -1 on the RC vote > > > > I agree that in the staged maven repository we should stick to SHOULD > > guidance until such time that the maven tooling has a supported option to > > use correct

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

I don't have strong feelings about how we implement hosting the RC, but I do want the RC to contain the actual checksum that we're going to use when we publish on dist.a.o in the release. Otherwise we're not verifying that said checksum is correct for the artifact we're voting on, which is part

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:11 AM Sean Busbey wrote: > -1 on the RC vote > > I agree that in the staged maven repository we should stick to SHOULD > guidance until such time that the maven tooling has a supported option to > use correct checksums. (Have we verified that the relevant tooling at a >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

+1 * verified hashes and signature * build passed mvn clean verify -Psunny * build passed all unit testing * ran an accumulo instance using Uno * verified basic functionality via the accumulo shell command On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > I am strongly against generating and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

I am strongly against generating and publishing checksum information after a vote because that ostensibly means it hasn't been verified and voted on. On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Christopher wrote: > Mike, > > We use stronger checksums (SHA512) in the SVN[1] area and downloads page[2] > aft

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

I am trying to understand what you are looking for with your -1. It sounds like you want following files created in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/accumulo/1.9.0 for each release candidate: accumulo-1.9.0-bin.tar.gz accumulo-1.9.0-bin.tar.gz.asc accumulo-1.9.0-bin.tar.gz.sha512 accumulo-1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

sorry, that should have been "staged maven repository should stick to MUST guidance" On 2018/04/15 14:11:43, Sean Busbey wrote: > -1 on the RC vote > > I agree that in the staged maven repository we should stick to SHOULD > guidance until such time that the maven tooling has a supported opt

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

-1 on the RC vote I agree that in the staged maven repository we should stick to SHOULD guidance until such time that the maven tooling has a supported option to use correct checksums. (Have we verified that the relevant tooling at a minimum has a request in to add it?) However, I can't verify

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

Mike, We use stronger checksums (SHA512) in the SVN[1] area and downloads page[2] after a vote passes. In fact, we're one of the only "perfect projects" in regards to compliance with this policy[3]. The Maven staging area doesn't follow all the "SHOULD" statements, but that's only because these c

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

-0 please do not publish md5 sums please add missing sha256 sums apache release policy: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Mike Walch wrote: > +1 > > * Verified sha1 & md5 hashes matched > * Verified signatures > * Ran binary tarball

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

+1 * Verified sha1 & md5 hashes matched * Verified signatures * Ran binary tarball locally using Uno * Ran 'mvn verify' successfully for wikisearch using RC jars On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Christopher wrote: > Accumulo Developers, > > Please consider the following candidate for Apache Acc

RE: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

[mailto:ctubb...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 6:22 PM To: accumulo-dev Subject: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1 Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.9.0. Git Commit: bca516000bdb54b1e5582f908e0a525634a120f7 Branch: 1.9.0-rc1 If

Re: [VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

Verified sha1, md5 and asc signatures for src and binary tars. Successfully built using 'mvn clean verify -Psunny' from the extracted source. I plan on setting up a cluster for randomwalk on Monday. On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 6:21 PM, Christopher wrote: > Accumulo Developers, > > Please consider t

[VOTE] Apache Accumulo 1.9.0-rc1

Accumulo Developers, Please consider the following candidate for Apache Accumulo 1.9.0. Git Commit: bca516000bdb54b1e5582f908e0a525634a120f7 Branch: 1.9.0-rc1 If this vote passes, a gpg-signed tag will be created using: git tag -f -m 'Apache Accumulo 1.9.0' -s rel/1.9.0 \ bca5160