[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQCPP-532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13887550#comment-13887550
]
Andrei Gheorghe commented on AMQCPP-532:
I've tried closing the queuebrowser but u
I understand your looking to solve this. My advice was not specific enough.
In the webconsole, or jmx client, is it possible to see mbeans for all of the
application consumers? And, can you check the message counts for each to
confirm the broker-side of what you see?
The use case of multiple
Hi,
I am trying to configure last will message in MQTT but it's not working.
There is also JIRA created for the same.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4692
Can someone please tell how and where it's implemented in AMQ ?
Any help is appreciated.
Regards,
Vatsal
--
View this message
Artnaseef,
Messages are NOT being dispatched to each consumer. All the consumers
appear in the webconsole, but only the first consumer to connect actually
receives messages. I looked at the unit tests, but other than to get the
syntax of the prefetch value, they aren't very useful for this us
Hi Rob!
Sorry about the late reply.
On Jan 30, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Robert Davies wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> its great to know that you are earning so much money from Apache ActiveMQ!
>
> I want the best experience for the end user of ActiveMQ - and that’s it -
> simple. Right now that’s hawtio. T
Github user artnaseef closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/11
GitHub user artnaseef opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/11
Changes to support paged web retrieval of messages.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/artnaseef/activemq trunk
Alternatively y
This might help:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/prefetch-size-variations-with-nms-connections-td4668250.html
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Multiple-consumers-not-working-with-1-6-2-tp4677078p4677140.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list
On 01/30/2014 07:09 PM, jaklug wrote:
I looked at it in the debugger and while it doesn't appear to be set, the
ActiveMQ management UI (hawtio) shows the consumer with the prefetch size I
set in the consumer app. I can send you my sample console app, but it's
really simple and based on most of t
Based on your description, it should work.
Check the consumers presence with the webconsole or JMX, and confirm
messages are being dispatched to each.
Another consideration is checking the syntax on the prefetch value; let me
try to find the correct way to set it.
--
View this message in conte
I looked at it in the debugger and while it doesn't appear to be set, the
ActiveMQ management UI (hawtio) shows the consumer with the prefetch size I
set in the consumer app. I can send you my sample console app, but it's
really simple and based on most of the samples that are out there today.
Can
Hmm. I don't think we're talking the same language.
By "core", I mean in the same project. And, that taking it out of the
project would have a severe impact.
The idea that the console needs a complete re-write -- let's get that hashed
out on the "what is the problem" thread that I created.
rajdavies wrote
> Apache isn’t exactly the best place for innovation. Just look at this
> whole thread, imagine trying to create a UI based around consensus - it
> wouldn’t happen - so it doesn’t seem odd to me that the ASF wouldn't be
> there first choice.
Can you please expound on why Apache is
On 30 Jan 2014, at 23:20, artnaseef wrote:
> If hawtio is a "general console" then it won't ever be a core part of
> ActiveMQ, correct?
That’s up to debate by the ActiveMQ community. My view is that the console
should be up to the user.
>
> I believe ActiveMQ needs a webconsole in its core.
Come now - there's so much heated debate about the solution. What's the
problem?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Console-let-s-get-the-problem-defined-tp4677105p4677125.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If hawtio is a "general console" then it won't ever be a core part of
ActiveMQ, correct?
I believe ActiveMQ needs a webconsole in its core.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Move-the-ActiveMQ-web-console-to-a-sub-project-tp4676877p4677116.html
Sent fro
I suppose all maven plugins are written at apache?
On Thursday, January 30, 2014, Robert Davies wrote:
> so hawtio isn't aimed at Apache projects - its a general console - see
> http://hawt.io/plugins/index.html. Why should we try and force an open
> source community to join the ASF ?
>
> On 30
so hawtio isn’t aimed at Apache projects - its a general console - see
http://hawt.io/plugins/index.html. Why should we try and force an open source
community to join the ASF ?
On 30 Jan 2014, at 22:33, Tracy Snell wrote:
> Agreed a console for a bunch of Apache projects seems darn near perfe
Hadrian - Can you rephrase that - what do yo mean ?
On 30 Jan 2014, at 22:57, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Then it must be the best place for marketing due to the reach of the ASF
> communities and brands. Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Hadrian
>
>
> On 01/30/2014 04:23 PM, Robert Davies wrot
Then it must be the best place for marketing due to the reach of the ASF
communities and brands. Thanks for the clarification.
Hadrian
On 01/30/2014 04:23 PM, Robert Davies wrote:
I’m not a member of the hawtio community - but they were pretty clear they
didn’t feel the ASF was the best plac
Is there feedback here that can be used to make the community better? If
not, let's leave it out of the conversation as it becomes pure criticism.
Besides, we're all part of this community, right? Don't we like ourselves?
Disagreements are good. See this writeup of a story from Steve Jobs:
htt
On 30 Jan 2014, at 22:07, jgenender wrote:
> I am also interested in why not at Apache. Looking at the contributors list:
>
> https://github.com/hawtio/hawtio/graphs/contributors
>
> A lot of those names seem to jump out as being AMQ committers. I assume you
> would know, or perhaps one of th
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tracy Snell wrote:
> Agreed a console for a bunch of Apache projects seems darn near perfect for
> Apache.
maybe the key words were "best place to innovate" :)
>
> On Jan 30, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Robert Davies wrote:
>
>> I'm not a member of the hawtio community
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Chris Geer wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >>
> >> The reason #2 is important for this conversation is that if the PMC
> >> decided to include hawt.io (providing the skinning
Agreed a console for a bunch of Apache projects seems darn near perfect for
Apache.
On Jan 30, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Robert Davies wrote:
> I’m not a member of the hawtio community - but they were pretty clear they
> didn’t feel the ASF was the best place to innovate and develop a UI.
Reading through the arguments for and against removal of the current console,
or moving it to a subproject, is getting confusing. Positions are hard to
understand, and options unclear.
I propose getting the problem clearly and concisely defined, then discuss
the merits of each position, and then
On Jan 30, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Chris Geer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>> The reason #2 is important for this conversation is that if the PMC
>> decided to include hawt.io (providing the skinning/branding is fixed), it
>> would also HAVE to include any other t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13887162#comment-13887162
]
Timothy Bish commented on AMQNET-454:
-
Patch applied.
> Add Apache Qpid provider to
I am also interested in why not at Apache. Looking at the contributors list:
https://github.com/hawtio/hawtio/graphs/contributors
A lot of those names seem to jump out as being AMQ committers. I assume you
would know, or perhaps one of the other hawt.io contributors would like to
chime in?
Also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chuck Rolke updated AMQNET-454:
---
Attachment: Apache.NMS.AMQP-fix-helloworld-13.patch
This patch fixes up HelloWorld after ActiveMQ bro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michal Růžička updated AMQ-5008:
Attachment: (was: CRL_checking.patch)
> Support for certificate revocation checking (with patch)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michal Růžička updated AMQ-5008:
Attachment: CRL_checking.patch
Just very slightly simplified version of the patch.
> Support for cer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michal Růžička updated AMQ-5008:
Comment: was deleted
(was: Just very slightly simplified version of the patch.)
> Support for certif
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael O'Cleirigh updated AMQ-5009:
Attachment:
on-v5.9.0-AMQ-5009-switch-to-pom-based-dependency-aggregation-.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael O'Cleirigh updated AMQ-5009:
Patch Info: Patch Available
> Switch activemq-all from shaded jar to pom dependency aggregato
Michael O'Cleirigh created AMQ-5009:
---
Summary: Switch activemq-all from shaded jar to pom dependency
aggregator
Key: AMQ-5009
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5009
Project: ActiveMQ
I’m not a member of the hawtio community - but they were pretty clear they
didn’t feel the ASF was the best place to innovate and develop a UI.
On 30 Jan 2014, at 20:54, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Rob, not sure what question you answered, but again, what were the reasons to
> develop hawt.io ou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michal Růžička updated AMQ-5008:
Attachment: CRL_checking.patch
> Support for certificate revocation checking (with patch)
> -
Michal Růžička created AMQ-5008:
---
Summary: Support for certificate revocation checking (with patch)
Key: AMQ-5008
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5008
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Typ
On 01/30/2014 04:04 PM, jaklug wrote:
Yes, I tried this connection string:
const string _connString =
"activemq:failover:(tcp://activemq1:61616,tcp://activemq2:61616)?nms.prefetc
hPolicy.queuePrefetch=1";
Any other suggestions?
_
If you reply to this email, your message will
Yes, I tried this connection string:
const string _connString =
"activemq:failover:(tcp://activemq1:61616,tcp://activemq2:61616)?nms.prefetc
hPolicy.queuePrefetch=1";
Any other suggestions?
_
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://a
Rob, not sure what question you answered, but again, what were the
reasons to develop hawt.io outside the ASF that you alluded to?
Hadrian
On 01/30/2014 03:40 PM, Robert Davies wrote:
Red Hat employees thousands of open source developers, who in turn develop on
hundreds of projects. Develope
On 01/30/2014 03:45 PM, jaklug wrote:
I'm using the Apache.NMS driver 1.6.2. I want to have multiple consumers
receive message from a queue either in a round-robin fashion or based on the
prefetch value. Regardless of what I set for the delivery policy or the
prefetch value, I can only get one
I'm using the Apache.NMS driver 1.6.2. I want to have multiple consumers
receive message from a queue either in a round-robin fashion or based on the
prefetch value. Regardless of what I set for the delivery policy or the
prefetch value, I can only get one consumer to receive messages. Here is m
Red Hat employees thousands of open source developers, who in turn develop on
hundreds of projects. Developers are encouraged to go and explore new stuff.
New projects can form anywhere under loose guidelines (e.g. GitHub, Eclipse,
Apache, JBoss community are fine - its really is up to that comm
Hi,
I am still planning to release 5.9.1. We need to figure out if we want
to cut 5.9.1 off of the current trunk at a stable checkpoint, or branch
it off 5.9.0 and just select the relevant patches. While the feedback on
this list is not conclusive (and I personally favor the 1st approach) I
b
There were post for cutting 5.9.1 any update on timeline for this?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activemq-5-9-1-tp4677074.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 30 Jan 2014, at 18:05, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>> I want the best experience for the end user of ActiveMQ - and that’s it -
>> simple.
>
> If that’s your primary driver for the ActiveMQ project at Apache, we already
> have a problem. The primary goal of an Apache project should be to build
Since you made this claim, can you please explain what the reasons are?
Hopefully it will clarify the misunderstanding. Personally I find it
very hard to understand how a company that invests in something would
not care what the outcome is.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 01/30/2014 03:10 AM, Robert Davi
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> > I want the best experience for the end user of ActiveMQ - and that's it
> - simple.
>
> If that's your primary driver for the ActiveMQ project at Apache, we
> already have a problem. The primary goal of an Apache project should be
> to
Zakeria, make sure you fill out and submit an Individual Contributor
License Agreement. I'll make sure it gets filed quickly so you can
contribute. Thanks for jumping in! It's great to see enthusiastic folks
On Thursday, January 30, 2014, Zakeria Hassan
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Well put ! I re
+1 on all counts to Chris' comments... and a -1 to moving the console
(non-binding).
I guess I just don't get why hawt.io cannot be skinned and have it become a
part of the project. It seems to me that allowing it to be skinned allows
it to not only give it the AMQ look and feel... but allows pro
Zak,
That's really easy. All Apache communities encourage collaboration and
recognize merit. In spite of the occasional friction, we have a common
goal and interest in making the ActiveMQ project better.
So keep your contributions coming and thanks!
Hadrian
On 01/30/2014 01:29 PM, Zakeria
Hi Daniel,
Well put ! I really liked your response to the thread "on putting ActiveMQ
web-console to a subproject..." . I originally voted +1 on this but after
reading what you emailed, it changed my mind. I want to let you know I am
ready to help to make the console better, just create some issue
> I want the best experience for the end user of ActiveMQ - and that’s it -
> simple.
If that’s your primary driver for the ActiveMQ project at Apache, we already
have a problem. The primary goal of an Apache project should be to build the
community of developers working on and contributing
At the risk of making someone unhappy I'll throw in my 2-cents from an
user's perspective.
I do see some advantage to providing official AMQ support for hawtio and
getting rid of the current console. At the same time I also understand the
hesitation to completely punt the console to a different pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13886740#comment-13886740
]
Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-5004:
---
Root cause is due to the SASL handshake and the proto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQ-5007.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.10.0
Assignee: Timothy Bish
Fixed on trunk.
> Upgr
Oops, didn't realize that some of the parties are actually not on
private@. Maybe in private then.
Hadrian
On 01/30/2014 11:11 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Rob, please stop stretching the truth. I would strongly encourage you
guys if you really want to continue the discussion on this tone to do
Rob, please stop stretching the truth. I would strongly encourage you
guys if you really want to continue the discussion on this tone to do it
on private@.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 01/30/2014 03:10 AM, Robert Davies wrote:
Hi Johan,
its great to know that you are earning so much money from Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Earls reassigned AMQ-4997:
Assignee: Kevin Earls
> Dead code in VMTransport class
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Earls reassigned AMQ-4899:
Assignee: Kevin Earls
> Multiple consumers of the same virtual topic queue cannot have different
> m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13886684#comment-13886684
]
Arthur Naseef commented on AMQ-4994:
Ditto on the desire to move the entire solution to
Timothy Bish created AMQ-5007:
-
Summary: Upgrade Proton to v0.6
Key: AMQ-5007
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5007
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13886656#comment-13886656
]
Daniel Kulp commented on AMQ-4994:
--
Could a new JIRA be created for the pagination stuff?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13886653#comment-13886653
]
Dejan Bosanac commented on AMQ-4994:
In my opinion it would be the best to move off the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish updated AMQNET-469:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Add support for self-signed broker certificates
> -
GitHub user dkulp opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/10
[AMQ-4994] Remove site-mesh
This pull request will remove SiteMesh from the war. This solves the
immediate OOM problem by allowing the information to stream directly back to
the client without buf
Christoffer Sawicki created AMQNET-469:
--
Summary: Add support for self-signed broker certificates
Key: AMQNET-469
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-469
Project: ActiveMQ .Net
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christoffer Sawicki updated AMQNET-469:
---
Attachment: add-support-for-self-signed-broker-certificates.patch
> Add support for s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQCPP-532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13886638#comment-13886638
]
Timothy Bish commented on AMQCPP-532:
-
Try closing the browser before deleting it
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-5002.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix committed.
> AMQP: If a proton client only sets the ttl, and not the message t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevin Earls resolved AMQ-5006.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Upgrade surefire to the latest version
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQNET-468.
-
Resolution: Fixed
fixed on trunk
> Fix misspellings of "invalid"
> -
Christoffer Sawicki created AMQNET-468:
--
Summary: Fix misspellings of "invalid"
Key: AMQNET-468
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-468
Project: ActiveMQ .Net
Issue Type: B
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christoffer Sawicki updated AMQNET-468:
---
Attachment: fix-misspellings-of-invalid.patch
> Fix misspellings of "invalid"
> -
I bit off topic but I’d love to hear the reasons. Especially since it’s a
product entirely focused on providing a console for Apache projects.
(my income will remain undisclosed)
On Jan 30, 2014, at 3:10 AM, Robert Davies wrote:
> hawtio isn’t at the ASF for other reasons.
Kevin Earls created AMQ-5006:
Summary: Upgrade surefire to the latest version
Key: AMQ-5006
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5006
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Repor
Hi Johan,
its great to know that you are earning so much money from Apache ActiveMQ!
I want the best experience for the end user of ActiveMQ - and that’s it -
simple. Right now that’s hawtio. The old web console is frankly well beyond
love - but I can understand from a money making point of
79 matches
Mail list logo
