+1000 on rebase before pushing from feature branch
-- Clebert Suconic typing on the iPhone.
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 02:08, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> Any branch can be deleted, see 'git branch -d' and 'git branch -D'. Also,
> remote branches (like one pushed to the origin) can be removed by doing
Hello Friends,
I want to find out the timestamp (from consumer) ,when the message start
processing , and when complete their process ..means ideal state time ,
running state time , termination state time just like different states in
Thread..
Thanks
Mayank Agarwal
--
View this message in
Any branch can be deleted, see 'git branch -d' and 'git branch -D'. Also,
remote branches (like one pushed to the origin) can be removed by doing a
'git push origin :branch_name'.
My only question about the use of git feature branches (which I agree
should definitely be used) is the workflow used
You Break I fix it :)
Seriously though... you're more than welcomed to fix stuff :)
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> I volunteer. How badly do you want it broken?
>
> Hadrian
>
>
>
> On 06/09/2015 12:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 9, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Clebe
GitHub user johnament opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/24
ARTEMIS-91 Separated out interface for ServiceRegistry. Provided a gâ¦
â¦etter in the ActiveMQServer interface.
@jmesnil is this what you were thinking?
You can merge this pul
I volunteer. How badly do you want it broken?
Hadrian
On 06/09/2015 12:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Jun 9, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Just to follow up, I have nothing against others using the github tooling or whatever i
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/23
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/23
ARTEMIS-135 - Fix on journal load
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-135
This is importing a recent fix from the journal on the old version.
If a crash happene
Github user thiagokronig commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/8#issuecomment-110862182
yes I can.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:44 PM clebertsuconic
wrote:
> I think we should keep Error Prone on the compilation.. unless it st
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/8#issuecomment-110828541
I think we should keep Error Prone on the compilation.. unless it starts to
bother people.
So far I think it's useful.
can you send the
Github user thiagokronig commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/8#issuecomment-110823751
@clebertsuconic we are skipping checkstyle, may we skip Error Prone also,
just to maintain certain compatibility with the ActiveMQ codebase?
On W
Github user thiagokronig commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/8#issuecomment-110814326
@clebertsuconic, here:
tests/activemq5-unit-tests/pom.xml:23:
1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Changing to 1.0.1-SNAPHOT breaks the build because of Erro
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Andy Taylor wrote:
> The branch can be removed, I know because I accidentally created one :). Im
> just wondering if these branches appear in Github?
That I am sure it will. The tags are mirrored at the github fork as
well, so brranches will for sure.
Actually co
I am out of the office until 06/18/2015.
I am out of the office and will return on Thursday 6/18/2015.
For emergent Activemq issues please contact Ralph Riedel or Isaac Arthur.
For Socket gateway contact Ralph Riedel or Matt W. Hall. For non emergent
issues please open a SID for the appropriate
+1, I think that covers it really well Daniel. It encourages people to
have large changes reviewed but doesn't mandate it.
Andy
On 10/06/15 01:22, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I guess if it was up to me to actually write a formal doc describing the
process it would go something like:
———
ActiveM
15 matches
Mail list logo
