Re: New ActiveMQ Artemis Release

2016-05-20 Thread Martyn Taylor
+1, we're definitely due a release. Let's get on it. On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > Isn't it time to cut a new ActiveMQ Artemis release? The previous > 1.2.0 release is 5 months ago. And since the 1.0 release 1 year ago, > there has only be 1.1 and 1.2 releases. >

[HEADSUP] Artemis 1.3.0 release preparation

2016-05-20 Thread Martyn Taylor
Hi all, It's been a while since we last had an Artemis release and I think we're well overdue a 1.3.0. Since 1.2.0 good progress has been made on Artemis, including; OpenWire protocol improvements, support ActiveMQ 5.x JAAS plugins and an initial implementation of a DB store as well as hardening

[GitHub] activemq pull request: AMQ-6298: Fixed Spring Import-Package wildc...

2016-05-20 Thread soleger
GitHub user soleger opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/186 AMQ-6298: Fixed Spring Import-Package wildcard The org.springframework wildcard is above the Spring-DM org.springframework.osgi import, causing incorrect OSGi metadata. https://issues.apa

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: [ARTEMIS-506] PagingTest#testDelete...

2016-05-20 Thread gaol
Github user gaol commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/495#issuecomment-220559790 @clebertsuconic I think the 3 lines starts from: [PageSubscriptionImpl#reloadPageCompletion()](https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/3e2adf123b96c3dfad

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: [ARTEMIS-506] PagingTest#testDelete...

2016-05-20 Thread gaol
Github user gaol closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/495 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

Re: [HEADSUP] Artemis 1.3.0 release preparation

2016-05-20 Thread John D. Ament
I have been testing with local builds off and on. It's definitely working quite well. Have docs been update for the DB Journal? On May 20, 2016 04:41, "Martyn Taylor" wrote: > Hi all, > > It's been a while since we last had an Artemis release and I think we're > well overdue a 1.3.0. > > Since

Raise JMS messages to all the nodes in cluster

2016-05-20 Thread Dignesh Goyal
1. Hi we do have a requirement of jms messages raised to be processed by each node in a cluster - Looks like topic does this by design. Is there any documentation on how to configure this. 2. We also want some of the destinations to be not to processed by all the nodes.- Is there any way we via co

Re: [HEADSUP] Artemis 1.3.0 release preparation

2016-05-20 Thread Martyn Taylor
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:16 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I have been testing with local builds off and on. It's definitely working > quite well. > Great, good to hear. > > Have docs been update for the DB Journal? > There's a section on JDBC storage under the persistence section of the user man

[GitHub] activemq pull request: AMQ-6298: Fixed Spring Import-Package wildc...

2016-05-20 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/186 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

More attention to - Apache ActiveMQ Github PRs

2016-05-20 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi We have about 40+ PRs on github and some of them are simple typo fixes and the likes which I have applied some of them which I could just find. But I think the AMQ team needs to step up a bit and pay more attention to the PRs and get them reviewed, merged or closed. It helps contributions to t

Artemis Replication before acknowledgement

2016-05-20 Thread aclayton
I am attempting to build a highly available Artemis cluster with zero message loss. Currently I am experimenting with a share nothing architecture, so each broker in the cluster has its own independent store with replication in between them. As far as I can tell when you are running Artemis clus

Re: Artemis Replication before acknowledgement

2016-05-20 Thread Justin Bertram
As far as I'm aware the broker should not acknowledge a durable message before it is replicated successfully specifically to avoid the problems you mention. What is your exact use-case, and what are you doing to confirm the message is being acked before replication? Justin - Original Mess

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: adding 2 links to the examples chap...

2016-05-20 Thread pgfox
GitHub user pgfox opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/528 adding 2 links to the examples chapter added 2 links to the example chapter which were omitted Best Regards Pat You can merge this pull request into a Git repository

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: Text fixes + CLI improvement

2016-05-20 Thread jbertram
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/529 Text fixes + CLI improvement You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work Alternatively you

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: adding 2 links to the examples chap...

2016-05-20 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/528 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the featu

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: Text fixes + CLI improvement

2016-05-20 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/529 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the featu

[GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request: new logging.properties and trace fo...

2016-05-20 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/523 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the featu

[GitHub] activemq pull request: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6...

2016-05-20 Thread sobkowiak
Github user sobkowiak closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/183 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] activemq pull request: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6...

2016-05-20 Thread sobkowiak
Github user sobkowiak closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/182 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] activemq pull request: Improved filename sanitization

2016-05-20 Thread dfj
Github user dfj closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/79 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable

[GitHub] activemq pull request: Improved filename sanitization

2016-05-20 Thread dfj
Github user dfj closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/78 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable

[GitHub] activemq pull request: Improved filename sanitization

2016-05-20 Thread dfj
Github user dfj closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/77 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable