Going to sound really lame I'm just signing my up to that list so don't have
the mail thread to reply to it, any chance you could make some reply so then I
can reply :)
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23 Jun 2017, at 16:18, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
> The discussion is moving to general at incubator.
The discussion is moving to general at incubator.apache.org
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/lists.html
If other people is backing up this.. than I'm all up for it...
so, if you support this, by that I mean.. if you want to get
involved.. then it's a good time to show you interest on that thr
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1361
@franz1981 I merged this by accident... will leave it be now :)
running the testsuite just to make sure it's ok
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1363
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1361
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1361
@clebertsuconic not yet! I'll run it now if is free :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1361
@franz1981 did you run the whole testsuite on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1361
@michaelandrepearce Yes, agree...But in that case (probably) the thread
pools executor services internal queues (+ capturing Runnables), the protocol
handling + Netty will be the most im
GitHub user dudaerich opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1363
ARTEMIS-1250
ClusteredMessageCounterTest.testNonDurableMessageAddedWithPaging fails
Before sending of messages to server 0 begins, the test
should wait until consumer is registered
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1361
@clebertsuconic Having only one instance would be optimal, but considering
that is a simple wrapper with no byte[] or off-heap memory allocated into it,
just avoiding 100K it's a good co
Hi Team,
My subscriber is going down after 5 mins of start of it.If am receiving
mesages from publisher then its not going down but if i dont receive any
messages(publisher is up and connected but not publishing any messages) then
after 5 mins its going down by throwing below .EOFException.
My UR
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1362
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user clebertsuconic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1362#discussion_r123740965
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/cluster/distribution/ClusteredMessageCounterTest.
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1361
@franz1981 Page itself is short lived. it will create a new one every time
we move to a different file. I was looking for a way to have the wrapper living
beyond the existence of pa
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1361
I think it's worthwhile (agreed the short one shows the improvement in
isolation)
But in general people run the brokers as long running concerns as such
should be put in th
GitHub user dudaerich opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1362
ARTEMIS-1250
ClusteredMessageCounterTest.testNonDurableMessageAddedWithPaging fails
Before sending of messages to server 0 begins, the test
should wait until consumer is registered
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1361
@michaelandrepearce I can run it for that extended period of time, but
consider that this one is an isolated test with only page writes, hence:
- no Page reads are performed
- no
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1361
Looks really good. Test is quite short time wise, do you have an equiv for
say a 30min to hour period.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user franz1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1361
@michaelandrepearce @clebertsuconic
You're right: these are the results of a test writing 100 Pages of 10MB
with messages of 100 bytes.
Just 2 notes:
- I've used the Artemis
Github user andytaylor closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1348
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1361
I agree this makes sense to me. @franz1981 is there a before and after vm
gc / profiling graphs showing the drop in object creation and like wise drop in
garabage collections. W
21 matches
Mail list logo
