Github user gaohoward closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2462
---
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2462
@gaohoward can you close this. It's merged after a rebase (I fixed a test
failure you had here).
Merge doesn't work well on 2.6.x.
---
Thanks. i had a heads up before on another thread but I couldn’t do
because of my workload on the task I was working on.
I will cut today and the vote thread sent tomorrow morning or later
tonight.
I personally want 2.7.0 out early next year. I will work proactively on
that (and welcome anyone
I'd say it has already been too long since the last one so I wouldnt
wait until next year. A heads up is nice, and somewhat required when
its been a long cycle and especially so if previous heads up have been
missed. In this case I'd personally say it would be fine to proceed
even later today if it
Github user gemmellr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2256
Delivery annotations are for per-hop usage, so the brokers the only thing
that should be adding delivery annotations to messages it is sending.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2256
---
Would be too bad if I cut this tomorrow? So we have time for a vote before
the Christmas week. Or anyone would rather have it next year ?
I had promised few weeks back but i was busy with a big chunk of work
around performance on AMQP.
--
Clebert Suconic
Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2464#discussion_r242205353
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-amqp-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/protocol/amqp/proton/ProtonServerReceiverContext.java
--
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2256
@jbertram yes, the broker can add additional message annotations as long as
those being added follow the rules from the spec, if the user adds something
that the remote doesn't understan
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2467
ARTEMIS-2205 Performance improvements on AMQP and other parts
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/clebertsuconic/a
Github user JiriOndrusek closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2266
---
Github user JiriOndrusek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2266
Closing as requested by previous comment
---
Github user jbertram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2266
Can you close this one as well, @JiriOndrusek?
---
Github user rstancel closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1975
---
Github user rstancel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1975
Closing this PR as requested by Justin Bertram @jbertram
---
Github user rpelisse closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2312
---
Github user rpelisse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2312
> I merged this on master and 2.6.x. @rpelisse, can you please close this?
Gladly!
---
GitHub user onlyMIT opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2466
NO-JIRA The MQTT consumer reconnection caused the queue to not be cleâ¦
### Test environment
1. Use 10,000 (9 thousand senders, 1 thousand consumers) MQTT connection on
one serv
18 matches
Mail list logo
