Re: [HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.12 and ActiveMQ 5.16.0

2020-01-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Technically it's possible, but I would inform the users first. So, 5.17.x gives us time to do so. Regards JB On 29/01/2020 11:30, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi all, > > If LevelDB is deprecated for several major versions, I'm wondering if we > should just not remove it in 5.16.0 instead of

Re: [HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.12 and ActiveMQ 5.16.0

2020-01-29 Thread Christopher Shannon
I am good with removing it from either but 5.17.0 might be better because we can send out a notice to the mailing lists and give users time to prepare in case anyone is still using it. The primary motivation to remove it now vs leaving it is so we don't have to worry about the Scala upgrade and

Re: [HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.12 and ActiveMQ 5.16.0

2020-01-29 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Hi all, If LevelDB is deprecated for several major versions, I'm wondering if we should just not remove it in 5.16.0 instead of waiting til 5.17.0? Colm. On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > OK, so, I will move forward on 5.16.0 with JDK11 support