Hi all, If LevelDB is deprecated for several major versions, I'm wondering if we should just not remove it in 5.16.0 instead of waiting til 5.17.0?
Colm. On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > OK, so, I will move forward on 5.16.0 with JDK11 support at runtime. > > I will focus on JDK11 build + LevelDB cleanup + other > cleanup/refactoring for 5.17.0. > > So, let me move forward on 5.16.0 as it's now ready ;) > > Regards > JB > > On 28/01/2020 20:22, Christopher Shannon wrote: > > We definitely do not want to remove JDK 8 support for 5.16.0 so my vote > is > > for option 1. I think it's fine if we build with JDK 8 as long as it > > supports JDK 8 - 11 at runtime. > > > > For 5.17.0 we can work on building with JDK 11. For one thing I think we > > should just make it easier on ourselves and remove LevelDB entirely as it > > has been deprecated now for several major versions and there isn't any > > reason to keep it at around at this point. > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> I would like to move forward on ActiveMQ releases: > >> > >> - ActiveMQ 5.15.12 > >> I'm preparing several dependency updates and important fixes on the > >> activemq-5.15.x branch. It includes some security fixes, postgresql jdbc > >> store performance improvements, ... > >> I have some PRs under review and on the fly, so, I plan to submit > >> 5.15.12 to vote next week. > >> > >> - ActiveMQ 5.16.0 > >> I did a full pass (standalone and in Apache Karaf) with JDK 11. The > >> broker works without problem, including on Karaf 4.2.8. > >> However, it's not currently possible to fully build with JDK 11. I have > >> a branch where I did the required changes (remove the use of tools.jar > >> in openwire generator, add annotation and jaxb dependency in different > >> modules, update scala for leveldb, ...). > >> The question that I have is about what's the exact target for 5.16.0: > >> 1. We still build ActiveMQ 5.16.x with JDK8, but it supports both JDK8 > >> or JDK11 at runtime. > >> 2. I do the changes required to build with JDK11, and then we will only > >> support JDK11 at runtime. > >> Thoughts ? > >> Anyway, I would like to submit 5.16.0 to vote asap, so please, let me > >> know what you think about JDK support (build or/and runtime). > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> -- > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> jbono...@apache.org > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >> > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
