Hi Matt,
thanks for the proposal.
Personally, I'm still skeptical about this kind of changes for
"technical wording".
If we really want to change, I think active/passive is the most accurate
for kahadb/store HA, both runtime mode and status. Anyway, in ActiveMQ,
we don't have concrete
[Abstract]
ActiveMQ 5 and Artemis are both re-working legacy terminology to better
describe function and move away from problematic language for shared storage
and replication terminology indicators.
[Background]
JIRA discussion: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7514
