+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 4:56 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> We receive several requests to provide a new (final) ActiveMQ 5.16.6
> release, including few security fixes/improvements.
>
> So, I submit ActiveMQ 5.16.6 release to your vote. This one should
+1 (binding)
* Verified signatures and checksums
* Checked source headers using 'mvn apache-rat:check'
* Built from source and verified build worked
* Started a broker from the tar file and verified everything started up ok
I think we can fix the copyright date for future releases, I don't
think
+1
Cheers,
Jamie
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 7:23 AM Adarsh Nair wrote:
>
> Any idea why activemq must be redelivering a message to another consumer when
> the first consumer had sent acknowledgement back to activemq?
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> ADARSH NAIR
> Software Engineer
> NICE
> (M) +91 (87)
Any idea why activemq must be redelivering a message to another consumer when
the first consumer had sent acknowledgement back to activemq?
Thanks & Regards,
ADARSH NAIR
Software Engineer
NICE
(M) +91 (87) 6677-6736
adarsh.n...@nice.com
www.nice.com
-Original Message-
From:
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks JB!
regards,
François
On 10/02/2023 16:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi guys,
We receive several requests to provide a new (final) ActiveMQ 5.16.6
release, including few security fixes/improvements.
So, I submit ActiveMQ 5.16.6 release to your vote. This one
