Re: Regarding ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release

2023-11-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Abhisek ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release is currently in voting. It fixes the issue on ActiveMQ RAR. It should be officially released during the weekend. Regards JB On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 5:18 AM Abhisek Swain wrote: > > Hi Team, > > Can you please update on the ETA or timelines for ActiveMQ 6.0.1 r

Regarding ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release

2023-11-30 Thread Abhisek Swain
Hi Team, Can you please update on the ETA or timelines for ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release. Please confirm if below fixes are done as part of the release. 1. Added below dependency in activemq-rar-6.0.0/META-INF/maven/org.apache.activemq/activemq-rar/pom.xml to support jakarta standards. jakarta.platf

Re: JMS API with client acknowledgement issue

2023-11-30 Thread Justin Bertram
I've created ARTEMIS-4520 [1] to deal with this. Thanks for reporting the issue! Justin [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4520 On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 4:08 AM Андрей wrote: > Hi Team, > > I am currently using "artemis-jakarta-client" 2.31.2 version > > I've stumbled into an is

Re: JMS API with client acknowledgement issue

2023-11-30 Thread Timothy Bish
On 11/30/23 12:22, Justin Bertram wrote: Tim, I think those are fair points. Ultimately I think the JavaDoc is relatively ambiguous, although I tend to favor your interpretation. To be honest I don't think it is, just read the first sentence and then ignore the fluff following as that is mainly

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release

2023-11-30 Thread Clebert Suconic
+1 On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 12:04 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:17 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > Following the 6.0.0 release, I submit 6.0.1 to your vote. > > > > This release includes fixes on top of 6.0.

Re: JMS API with client acknowledgement issue

2023-11-30 Thread Justin Bertram
Tim, I think those are fair points. Ultimately I think the JavaDoc is relatively ambiguous, although I tend to favor your interpretation. What does the Qpid JMS client do in this case? BTW, I looked through the Jakarta Messaging TCK source code and I don't see where this specific use-case is exer

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release

2023-11-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:17 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Following the 6.0.0 release, I submit 6.0.1 to your vote. > > This release includes fixes on top of 6.0.0, especially: > - fix Jakarta namespace in ActiveMQ RA > - fix OSGi headers in activemq-cf

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release

2023-11-30 Thread Matt Pavlovich
+1 (non-binding) - Verified the activmeq-rar has the fixed ra.xml w/ jakarta namespaces - Verified git commits on the 6.0.x branch align with JIRA Thanks JB! Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 30, 2023, at 7:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Following the 6.0.0 release, I submit 6.0.1

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release

2023-11-30 Thread Christopher Shannon
+1 (binding) * Validated signatures and checksums * Verified license and notice files in archives * Checked source license headers with 'mvn apache-rat:check' * Built from source and ran through several tests * Ran the broker from the binary archive and exercised the web console On Thu, Nov 30, 2

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release

2023-11-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys, Following the 6.0.0 release, I submit 6.0.1 to your vote. This release includes fixes on top of 6.0.0, especially: - fix Jakarta namespace in ActiveMQ RA - fix OSGi headers in activemq-cf and activemq-jms-pool - fix jolokia conf on Windows wrapper - fix Jetty secure connector example Re