eally needed.. but if we
> need it we can change the workflow at any point (when needed). WDYT?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Antoine Toulme
> wrote:
>> At Apache Buildr we push the docs out to the website without mapping them to
>> a release.
>>
At Apache Buildr we push the docs out to the website without mapping them to a
release.
We also push changes on a release.
We never update released bits - they're signed and voted and all.
> On Nov 14, 2016, at 08:11, Martyn Taylor wrote:
>
> I'm not 100% I am following properly here, but a c
On the Apache Buildr project (and I also witnessed it on the Apache Camel
project) there is open discussion of the roadmap and the objectives on the dev
list.
The board is also discussing having the board reports of projects being
prepared in the open - making sure contributors see what the dis
Very appreciated, thank you!
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
> that's what I mean.. your vote (which translates your opinion) has
> been recording... I will report +0s in the future unless someone tell
> me otherwise.
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016
you have registered your opinion. Thanks.
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Antoine Toulme
> wrote:
>> Hello Clebert,
>>
>> I think you’re missing my vote: +0 non binding, under the name Antoine
>> Toulme.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Antoine
&g
Hello Clebert,
I think you’re missing my vote: +0 non binding, under the name Antoine Toulme.
Cheers,
Antoine
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>
> Results of the Apache Artemis 1.5.0 release:
>
> Vote passes with 5 Binding +1 Votes, and 4 Non B
to get this resolved and into to a release soon.
>>>
>>> I'm more than happy to help you get started with the code base, the IRC
>>> channels is great for this type of discussion. My nick is martyntaylor
>>> feel free to ping me,
>>>
>
cussion. My nick is martyntaylor
> feel free to ping me,
>
> Thanks
> Martyn
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Antoine Toulme
> wrote:
>
>> I would absolutely love to help with a fix. That’s why I created the bug
>> and provided rep
issues we can between each
> releases. We will get there eventually, maybe you could even give us
> hand on the fix? that's the beauty of open source.
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Antoine Toulme
> wrote:
>> I have just tried the release bits with the bug I reported (AR
I have just tried the release bits with the bug I reported (ARTEMIS-806) and I
see the same incorrect behavior, where MQTT subscribers are not notified of
messages published to another node in the cluster.
I therefore am casting +0 (non-binding).
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Christopher Shann
Hello all,
I played with Consul and ActiveMQ to create a dynamic cluster, using a mesh of
networks.
This is a proof of concept, just to show it’s possible.
I hope this helps others.
Cheers,
Antoine
I have filed an issue to follow up:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-806
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-806>
Please let me know if and how I can help further.
Thanks!
Antoine
> On Oct 15, 2016, at 12:32 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
> I have manag
t none are received.
If you change the subscription to “mqtt/bar” line 71 and 103, messages are
passed OK.
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 5:52 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
> I have a test showing a cluster using MQTT, but it passes.
>
> Either the test is bogus, the issue is intermittent
ned on
-with the latest code from master
Any help is very appreciated.
Thanks,
Antoine
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 8:28 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 14, 2016, at 3:01 AM, Martyn Taylor > <mailto:mtay...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> As a quick check can
o point at each other.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Antoine Toulme
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> we are trying out ActiveMQ Artemis with MQTT. We are interested in using
>> pattern subscription such as foo/# to listen to a set of topic
Hello,
we are trying out ActiveMQ Artemis with MQTT. We are interested in using
pattern subscription such as foo/# to listen to a set of topics.
We created a cluster in which one client publishes to a node, while an other
one subscribes to another.
When using pattern subscriptions, we see that
;m not sure what's caused the tests to time out,
> this does happens from time to time, I've restarted it.
>
> Thanks
> Martyn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Antoine Toulme <mailto:antoine.tou...@gmail.com>>
> wrot
Pardon me as this is my first attempted contribution to the project.
I am trying to contribute a small change to the example showing pub/sub with
MQTT.
I would like to know more about the contribution process and if I broke any
rules.
I also saw that the jenkins build testing my change timed o
18 matches
Mail list logo
