Great! I am tmio on IRC, when is a good time to catch you? I tried to find you 
when I filed the bug but was probably too late in your day.

> On Nov 4, 2016, at 12:23 PM, Martyn Taylor <mtay...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Antoine,
> 
> I'm sorry your issue has not been addressed yet, I've been meaning to look
> into this myself, but have been snowed under with other things recently.
> We should be able to get this resolved and into to a release soon.
> 
> I'm more than happy to help you get started with the code base, the IRC
> channels is great for this type of discussion.  My nick is martyntaylor
> feel free to ping me,
> 
> Thanks
> Martyn
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine.tou...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> I would absolutely love to help with a fix. That’s why I created the bug
>> and provided reproduction steps.
>> 
>> However I was stomped with the code itself and have had no luck
>> reproducing this at smaller scale.
>> 
>> I did ask on the mailing list for help and steps to help move this forward
>> further. Your help in unblocking me, from pointing which area of the code
>> would be a likely culprit, to pointing me to better instructions to debug
>> interactions in cluster with finer logging,
>> helping me understand better the messaging model of symmetric clusters,
>> or hinting at the status of MQTT support and what to reliably expect would
>> be very appreciated.
>> 
>>> On Nov 4, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We had a lot of fixed done on 1.5.0…
>>> 
>>> I guess it wasn't clear if your issue was a configuration issue or an
>>> actual bug. But we try to fix as many issues we can between each
>>> releases. We will get there eventually, maybe you could even give us
>>> hand on the fix? that's the beauty of open source.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Antoine Toulme <antoine.tou...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> I have just tried the release bits with the bug I reported
>> (ARTEMIS-806) and I see the same incorrect behavior, where MQTT subscribers
>> are not notified of messages published to another node in the cluster.
>>>> 
>>>> I therefore am casting +0 (non-binding).
>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 4, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Christopher Shannon <
>> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Fabio Gomes dos Santos <
>>>>> supergr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2016-11-03 19:29 GMT-02:00 Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com
>>> :
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I would like to propose an Apache Artemis 1.5.0 release.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 1.5.0 has these new features as highlights.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-724] - Implement no-local consumer support in AMQP
>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-737] - Add JUnit Rules
>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-743] - Default the queue address to the queue name
>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-753] - Persist pause status after restart of the broker.
>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-756] - Add basic CDI integration
>>>>>>> [ARTEMIS-824] - Management operations for creating and destroying
>>>>>>> connector services
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> And many other fixes as part of this release, the complete release
>>>>>>> notes can be found here:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>>>>>>> version=12338118&styleName=Html&projectId=12315920&Create=Create
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The binary distributions can be found here:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>> orgapacheactivemq-1109/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/1.5.0/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The source archives can be found here:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>> orgapacheactivemq-1109/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/1.5.0/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The Maven repository is here:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>> orgapacheactivemq-1109/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The source tag:
>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.
>>>>>>> git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.5.0
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The project website for that version has been staged to:
>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~clebertsuconic/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The vote will remain open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 1.4.0
>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Here's my (binding) +1 vote
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Fábio Santos
>>>>>> supergr...@gmail.com
>>>>>> <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Clebert Suconic
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to