just for the record, I downloaded the binary, and run a couple of
producers and consumers in AMQP.
+1 binding from me
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 4:10 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:17 AM Timothy Bish wrote:
> >
> > On 7/20/24 03:28,
cksums
> * Verified license and notice files in archives
> * Checked source license headers with 'mvn apache-rat:check'
> * Ran binary install and checked web console works
> * Ran some AMQP client examples against the running broker install
>
> --
> Tim Bish
>
>
> --
I'm thinking about cutting a release tomorrow. Anyone have anything
that would push it back?
--
Clebert Suconic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Ok. That’s nice.
I will upgrade my maven just in case.
I would still like to use a higher version in next releases to prevent
issues . Don’t know yet if we should enforce it. Will think about it.
And if anyone has any opinion let us know ?
Clebert Suconic
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 1:45 PM
I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.35.0
Downloads are now available at:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/
For a complete list of updates:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.35.0
Many thanks for all the
So... I was thinking about eventually enforcing 3.9.3+ as we talked
about... but that might break people's CI...
For now we recommend using 3.9.3 on releasing, but we may add an enforcer rule.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 11:58 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> If you are release ActiveMQ A
better to upgrade... ).
I was talking "in person" with Robbie Gemmel about this and he might
have more context about it.
--
Clebert Suconic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
For additiona
The Vote has passed with 5 binding votes.
Clebert Suconic
Timothy Bish
Arthyr Naseef
Justin Bertram
Krysztof (Havret)
I will update the website and send the announcement as soon as it's ready
Thank you all for your time on evaluating this Candidate Release.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 5:22 PM
iption=DataProcessor user=null maxSession=15):
> ActiveMQIllegalStateException[errorType=ILLEGAL_STATE message=AMQ229025:
> Cannot delete queue DataProcessor on binding DataProcessor - it has consumers
> = org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.postoffice.impl.LocalQueueBinding]
>
> ```
&g
This is to officially record my Binding Vote:
+1 (Binding)
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 12:36 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.35.0 release.
>
> I would like to highlight the following changes:
>
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.35.0 release.
I would like to highlight the following changes:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4813 In a rare race,
Large messages that were partially sent before the broker started to
replicate could become damage and part of
some API changes...
I'm not going to hold beyond tomorrow as I want to have this fix out
of the door as soon as possible.
--
Clebert Suconic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
For additional commands
Just wanted to apologize... I didn't mention Tim Bish's name on the result.
Sorry Tim, I always appreciate your input during releases and I saw
your work on this.. It was a clerical error.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 11:14 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> The Vote has passed with 8 Votes (7 P
I'm pleased to announce the release of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.34.0 release.
Downloads are now available at:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/
For a complete list of updates:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.34.0
Also the
The Vote has passed with 8 Votes (7 PMC + 1 Committer)
PMC Votes (Binding)
Clebert Suconic
JB Onofre
Justin Bertram
Gary Tully
Domenico Bruscino
Havret (Krzysztof)
Christopher shannon
Commiter Votes (Non Binding)
Anton Roskvist
Thank you all for your time evaluating this release.
i will go
) and it's definitely not an issue.
If you reproduce the issue and provide me info I can check better.
Clebert Suconic
On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 6:40 AM Havret wrote:
> Hi Clebert, Justin,
>
> I've checked the previous version (2.33.0), as Justin suggested, and it's
> working f
t;> Connection brokerURL = tcp://localhost:61616
> >> Running QueueCheck
> >> Checking that a producer can send 1000 messages to the queue TEST ...
> >> success
> >> Checking that a consumer can browse 1000 messages from the queue TEST ...
> >> suc
just to record my +1 Binding officially.
also there was a typo on my highlights (Statistics instead of
Statics).. I will upload the doc with the updated version on the
website. No need to respin the release for this.
The release is still valid...
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 1:42 PM Clebert Suconic
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.34.0 release.
I would like to highlight the following improvements as part of this release:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4758 - Extensive
resiliency tests and hardening on Mirroring.
*
I am proceeding with the release.
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:09 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> Can I do a release? Does anyone have any issues?
>
> I work with Robbie Gemmel (not on the same desk, but I work remotely
> close to him). and I'm not going to pretend I didn't talk to
now? Should we wait for the fix?
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 1:50 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> as usual I don't keep my promises :)
>
> I didn't do it for personal conflicts.. but I'm going to do it as soon
> as personal agenda clears up in the next few days.
>
>
> On Wed,
I don't get to see my own emails. so I don't know if the issue was
complete or not. if someone could please confirm there's an
unsubscribe on the emails sent by the lists now?
Thank you.
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 7:23 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> This will serve as an announce and as
This will serve as an announce and as a test:
As a result from
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25799 and our vote, from now on
our mail lists will include information on how to unsubscribe from our
mailing list.
Here is the JIRA on INFRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25799
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 2:43 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> The Vote has passed with
> 10 Votes (8 Bindines, 2 non Binding).
>
> Binding:
> Clebert Suconic
> Domenico Bruscino
> Matt Pavlovich
The Vote has passed with
10 Votes (8 Bindines, 2 non Binding).
Binding:
Clebert Suconic
Domenico Bruscino
Matt Pavlovich
Bruce Snyder
Timothy Bish
Christopher Shannon
JB Onofre
Arthur Nassef
Non Binding:
JD Liu
Preveen Kumar
Thanks for all who participate in the vote:
That means we have
Just for clarification, such change would take effect in all of our
mail lists.. not just user's list.. that goes into Dev, Users,
commits, JIRA, and any other lists that I might be forgetting now.
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 2:19 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I want to propose having all
vote with a +1 or -1. In case of a -1 please
indicate your reasoning for such.
Here goes my +1 Binding Vote.
--
Clebert Suconic
as usual I don't keep my promises :)
I didn't do it for personal conflicts.. but I'm going to do it as soon
as personal agenda clears up in the next few days.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:08 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to start / tag a release on Friday, April 26th.
>
it's time for a new release now.
--
Clebert Suconic
+1
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 5:06 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic" 6.1.2 release to your vote.
> >
> > This release includes 8 fixes,
+1 binding
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 5:24 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Gentle reminder on this vote: we would need one more binding vote.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 11:25 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ "Classic"
think we should keep
everything open and just use private list for private comments that’s fine.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 2:47 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> Hi Clebert-
>
> How widely used are private comments today?
>
> I ran a search and I do not see any private comments in use with
ssueManager[1].
>
> @Justin Bertram thanks the detailed doc!!!
>
> [1]
>
> https://github.com/brusdev/downstream-updater/blob/main/src/main/java/dev/brus/downstream/updater/issue/GithubIssueManager.java
>
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 17:41, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
particular. I think it's worth discussing
> > > >> migration of ActiveMQ as a whole and diving a bit deeper into the
> > > >> details
> > > >> of why a migration makes (or doesn't make) sense and what the
> > > >> challenges
> > > >> may be.
> > > >>
> > > >> To this end I've put together this document [1]. I hope it will be of
> > > >> service to the community as we consider this option.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Justin
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]
> > > >> https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-website/wiki/Apache-ActiveMQ-GitHub-Issues-Migration-Review
> > >
--
Clebert Suconic
+1 binding
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:06 PM Cesar Hernandez wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) thank you!
>
> El mié, 3 abr 2024 a las 11:31, Matt Pavlovich ()
> escribió:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > - Reviewed PRs and JIRA issues
> > - Downloaded dist tar.gz and exercised the broker
> >
> > Thanks JB!
> >
though or if it has any
> > potential side effects (all divert related tests I've run passes).
> >
> > If this is an acceptable way of doing it, a divert-config such as
> > "reuse-user-session" could be used to gate new vs old behavior?
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.33.0/
> >
> > The Maven staging repository is here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1391/
> >
> > If you would like to validate the release:
> >
> > https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/#validating-releases
> >
> > It is tagged in the git repo as 2.33.0
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve this release
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
@dom Anton had added an address setting.
Perhaps we could have the property in the divert instead ?
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 4:01 AM Domenico Francesco Bruscino <
bruscin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for the new divert setting proposed by Clebert
>
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 18:15,
I will not be able to actually do this release.
I miscalculated the time for the VOTE versus when I'm expected to be away.
if someone else could do this release? (Justin Bertram? or anyone else
volunteering?)
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:29 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like
sounds good to me also.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 1:36 PM Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> Seems good to me
>
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 17:35, Andy Taylor wrote:
> >
> > so I am open to names, how about artemis-console-plugin v1.0.0
> >
> > On Mon, 18 Mar 2024
what is actually going in it, a console
> > > 'plugin' ?
> > >
> > > So perhaps activemq-artemis-console-plugin ?
> > >
> > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 07:46, Andy Taylor wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Lets go with a separate repo then, @clebert or an
is e-mail (including its attachments), and all copies
> thereof, are immediately deleted from your system. Please further note that
> when you communicate with us via email or visit our website we process your
> personal data. See our privacy policy for more information about how we
> process it: https://www.volvogroup.com/en-en/privacy.html
--
Clebert Suconic
14, 2024 at 10:29 AM Justin Bertram wrote:
> +1 for a separate repo
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 3:56 AM Andy Taylor
> wrote:
>
> > Clebert, I think it will be weeks rather than days so I would just
> release
> > when you are ready.
> >
e the consensus we can then look to create one.
>
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 08:51, Andy Taylor wrote:
> >
> > Clebert, I think it will be weeks rather than days so I would just release
> > when you are ready.
> >
> > Robbie, I think for now a separate repo is my p
ession or there's really nothing
> else important ready to go. This definitely isnt that and also isnt
> ready yet while other stuff is, so seems a clear no to me.
>
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 16:58, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > Should I wait for the 2.33 release ?
> >
>
Should I wait for the 2.33 release ?
See my other thread about the heads up.
Or you think this may take a lot longer ?
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 7:27 AM Andy Taylor wrote:
> The current Artemis console is based on HawtIO 1 which itself is written
> using Bootstrap. Bootstrap is old and no
ready before then...
Please ping me on github with a tag-comment on anything you want to
include.. or feel free to respond here with links to issues we should
fix before releasing. (or do both if you want :) )
thank you.
--
Clebert Suconic
Congrats Anton. Thanks for all the contributions.
Welcome.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 12:17 PM Bruce Snyder
wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome, Anton!
>
> Bruce
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 8:42 AM Justin Bertram
> wrote:
>
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache ActiveMQ has
I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.32.0.
Downloads are now available at:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/
For a complete list of updates:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.32.0
I would like to highlight the
The vote passed with 5 Binding Votes
+1 Robbie Gemmel
+1 Tim Bish
+1 Domenico
+1 JB Onofre
+1 Clebert Suconic
Thank you to everyone who contributed and took the time to review the
release candidates and vote.
I will add the files to the dist release repo and release the maven
staging repo
this is to record my +1 Binding Vote
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:29 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.32.0 release.
>
>
> I would like to highlight the following for this release:
>
>
> * Mirrored Core Messages can now be sen
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.32.0 release.
I would like to highlight the following for this release:
* Mirrored Core Messages can now be sent in their native format
without conversions
* Mirror has been extensively tested and improved in stability
* ActiveMQ Artemis has
Lets do this release without this one... and we can do it on the next.
I can't make the test to run correctly.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:09 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> Let me work on it tomorrow.
>
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 2:51 PM Roskvist Anton
> wrote:
>>
>&g
Let me work on it tomorrow.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 2:51 PM Roskvist Anton
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would be great if https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4705
> could be considered for merging, it has been bothering me for quite some
> time... provided the PR looks good of course. If it
I'm aiming to release on Wed Morning... willing to delay a day if
anyone needs it... (please ping me on this thread if a delay is
needed).
Otherwise if you get your PRs merged tomorrow and before then they
will be part of the release :)
--
Clebert Suconic
> Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 8:04 AM Francois Papon
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Now that the current release is on 6.x, I am searching for LTS
> > >> informations about the 5.x version but I cannot find it on the website.
> > >>
> > >> Is there some info about this topic?
> > >>
> > >> regards,
> > >>
> > >> François
> > >>
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
+1
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 12:04 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 2:17 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Following the 6.0.0 release, I submit 6.0.1 to your vote.
> >
> > This release includes fixes on top of
The Artemis in wildfly is not affected by the CVE as openwire is not
deployed in openwire.
Also 2.31 requires jdk 11 but I think it’s a worth choice as there are many
fixes in the broker.
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 9:40 AM Bhargav Budida
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> This is regarding a recent
and Wildfly
> 24.0.0.final or not ?
> 2. I don't want to upgrade my wildfly version, so are there any
> configurations required to work with latest artemis version
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards
> Bhargav
> 9860584899
--
Clebert Suconic
+1 binding
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 7:21 AM Domenico Francesco Bruscino <
bruscin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include
> pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.31.2<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./`
> * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 36
there do appear to be
> > various other projects that do this too:
> > https://github.com/orgs/apache/repositories?language==examples==all
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Robbie
--
Clebert Suconic
he release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours or as soon as we will
> > have 3 binding votes.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
>
--
Clebert Suconic
and component upgrade release.
Many thanks for all who helped on this release and the votes review
during the Release Voting Process.
--
Clebert Suconic
The vote passed with 3 binding votes: Clebert, Christopher Shannon and
Timothy Bish
I'm uploading the release now.
Thank you everyone!
Clebert
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 5:10 PM Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On 10/25/23 16:33, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > I would like to propose an Apa
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.1
This release contains bug fixes, improvements and component upgrades.
For a complete release refer to the JIRA release notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920=12353642
Source and binary
Just to record what Robbie Gemmel sent me :
https://github.com/mojohaus/jaxb2-maven-plugin
i'm not sure it works yet... just putting it here as a future note.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 6:03 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> In artemis/DTO, there's an ant call:
>
> https://github.com/apa
ase (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours or as soon as we will
> > have 3 binding votes.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
--
Clebert Suconic
elease:
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours or as soon as we will
> > have 3 binding votes.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
-mvnd/issues/897
I would appreciate any help on getting rid of this call.. does anyone
know a better way to do this?
Thanks
--
Clebert Suconic
it.
Sorry for any problems.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:45 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> sorry, I pressed sent by accident...
>
>
> So, as I'm consdering the release next week, please use this thread to
> inform me of anything that must be merged / fixed before we cut the
> release.
sorry, I pressed sent by accident...
So, as I'm consdering the release next week, please use this thread to
inform me of anything that must be merged / fixed before we cut the
release.
You could also ping me with a comment on the github PR.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:44 AM Clebert Suconic
I'm considering cutting a release early next week, around Oct-16th.
--
Clebert Suconic
I am pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0
Downloads are now available at:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/
For a complete list of updates:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.31.0
I would like to highlights
Release has passed
6 Binding votes:
Clebert Suconic
Tim Bish
JB Onofre
Domenico Bruschino
Robbie Gemmel
Justin Bertram
I will stage the website now and send an update (announce) when I'm done.
Thanks for taking the time on this vote thread.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 3:15 PM Justin Bertram
Just a small correction, the Maven Repository URI :
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1371
Sorry for the copy & paste mistake.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 3:40 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0 release.
This is the 2nd Respin of the release (RC2)
This was a large release overall with many improvements, and I'm proud
of what we accomplished on this release. Thanks for all who
contributed to this release by both raising JIRAs or
-1 I made a mistake with this release.. I'm going to re-spin.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:43 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Sept 2023 at 01:50, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0 release:
> >
> >
/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html
The release was tagged as 2.31.0 on git
I will update the website after the vote has passed.
[ ] +1 approve this release
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Here's my +1 Binding vote
--
Clebert Suconic
I am planning to do a release in the week of Sep 11 next week. I will
fix the upgrade issues before doing it so.
Anything else we must fix before a release?
--
Clebert Suconic
s-released cleanup, as some of the
> effectively-nothing-there junk within the wider clutter actually seems
> to have disappeared already.
>
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 15:48, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > I’m just saying it should be a no brainer. Old stuff on snapshot can
>
se
> in the tree as well.
>
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 14:40, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > +1000
> >
> > the snapshot can also be deployed by anyone's laptop from a PMC member.
> >
> >
> >
> > I thought there was an automatic rule to
to ask Infra to clear
> > > > out the snapshots repo, as I came to realise it is full of a
> > > > considerable amount of stale junk, including things that either add
> > > > clutter or just actively mislead people. Once cleared the nightly jobs
> > > > can then deploy just the stuff currently being worked on.
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24848
> > >
> > >
--
Clebert Suconic
chive and exercised the web console
> * Ran all the qpid-protonj2 client examples against the running broker
> * Ran all the AMQP tests using: mvn clean install -DskipTests && cd
> tests/integration-tests/ && mvn test -Ptests
> -Dtest=org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.integration.amqp.**
>
>
> --
> Tim Bish
>
--
Clebert Suconic
which.
> > > >
> > > > Before these images are widely adopted I think the namespace should be
> > > > clarified just as it is on the website so that ActiveMQ "Classic" uses
> > > > "apache/activemq/classic" and ActiveMQ Artemis uses
> > > > "apache/activemq/artemis".
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Justin
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4cqbm0gsbj184vrp13yorcd2rrbdcsmx
> > > > [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq/tags
> > >
> > >
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.29.0
Downloads are now available at:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/
For a complete list of updates:
https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.29.0
This has been released with
Results for the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.29.0:
Vote passes with 6 Binding Votes
Clebert Suconic
Domenico Bruscino
JB Onofre
Havret
Timothy Bish
Thank you everyone who took the time to evaluate and vote for this release.
I will update the artifacts and send an announce shortly.
Thanks again
;
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 1:39 AM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.29.0 release.
> >
> > This is a representative workload with 126 JIRAs and 200+ commits with
> > a diverse number of committers.
ecure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12352880=12315920)
for more information."
On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 7:39 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.29.0 release.
>
> This is a representative workload with 126 JIRAs and 200+ commits with
> a div
as '2.29.0'
I will update the website after the vote has passed.
[ ] +1 approve this release
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Here's my +1
I will keep the Vote open until monday, US EST morning, on June 19th
--
Clebert Suconic
ail (including its attachments), and all
> > copies thereof, are immediately deleted from your system. Please further
> > note that when you communicate with us via email or visit our website we
> > process your personal data. See our privacy policy for more information
> > about how we process it: https://www.volvogroup.com/en-en/privacy.html
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
of vacation next week and if I don't do this today I
will lose my window of opportunity.
(Unless someone would like me to delay it: On that case be warned that
you would be volunteering yourself to replace me as the release
manager :) )
--
Clebert Suconic
I will do the release as soon as I finish
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4418
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 6:53 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Some time this week. Perhaps on wed. --
> Clebert Suconic
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Some time this week. Perhaps on wed. --
Clebert Suconic
(hmm.. I had already sent the previous +1, sorry, I thought this was
another spin or something).
please make sure you only consider one vote from me.. my bad
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:19 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:42 AM Michael André Pea
+1
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:42 AM Michael André Pearce
wrote:
>
> +1 (Binding0
>
> Best
> Mike
>
> On 2023/03/12 21:21:41 Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 6:27 AM Havret wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
llowing change:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311201=12353001
>
> The files can be grabbed from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/2.1.0-rc1/
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
> Here's mine +1 (binding)
>
--
Clebert Suconic
ng to determine if I can optimize the routing mechanism by removing
> any unneeded functionality to reduce overhead to support a specific consumer
> use case that I have.
>
> Any information is appreciated!
>
> Thanks
> Brian R
--
Clebert Suconic
I meant to also send this JIRA:
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-88708
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 4:24 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> Just for the record: the public repo has been created already. I need
> to make a first release which will happen soon.
>
>
> The projec
Just for the record: the public repo has been created already. I need
to make a first release which will happen soon.
The project has been renamed as check-leak (Thanks Gary for the
name... I like it!)
https://github.com/check-leak/check-leak
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 10:21 PM Clebert Suconic
sorry.. correct URI for the project:
https://github.com/d-leak/d-leak
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 10:20 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> So.. this is it!!
>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4363
>
>
> It is using jitpack.io (Thanks Domenico)...
>
>
>
1 - 100 of 1901 matches
Mail list logo
