[DISCUSS] Artemis health check tool (ARTEMIS-2739)

I'm implementing a tool to determine whether the broker is in a healthy state. There is a series of health checks that can be performed, starting with the most basic and very rarely producing false positives, to increasingly more comprehensive, intrusive, and opinionated that have a higher probabil

Why I need Cannot Post Here using nabble

Hi, when I try to create a new topic using nabble http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html I get the following error: You Cannot Post Here Sorry, but you can't create new topics here. Note that you may sti

Re: Artemis Build Error

Hi Krzysztof, I was getting the same error using Intellij IDEA because my IDE runtime is Java 11 while the project SDK was Java 1.8. I fixed this error changing the project SDK to Java 11 and disabling the `Use --release option` from the Java Compiler settings of my IDE. You can get more details r

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.14.0

+1 * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.14.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 31 and Windows 10 using OpenJDK 8 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming mess

Re: Replace racially charged terms throughout source code, comments and documentation

I would propose to replace `master/slave` with `leader/follower` or other terms different from `live/backup` in ActiveMQ Artemis to keep the HA configuration role of the broker separated from the HA running role of the broker. For example, a broker instance with the `slave` HA configuration role co

[HEADS UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.15 release

I'm planning to create the next release early next week. There is an important fix on journal replication that improves the scalability (ARTEMIS-2877). Anyone has anything else that must be included? We should also merge PRs that are pending right now and in good condition. Regards, Domenico

Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.15 release

lease. > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 4:50 PM Justin Bertram > wrote: > > > > I'd like to get this PR in. > > > > > > Justin > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3245 > > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 10:14 AM Dom

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.15.0 release

I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.15.0 release. We added these new features as part of 2.15.0: [ARTEMIS-2847] - socks5h support [ARTEMIS-2855] - Define a new broker plugin to track XA transactions [ARTEMIS-2857] - Expose ActivemqServer::isActivated through ActiveMQServerControl

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.15

Results of the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.15 release vote. Vote passes with 8 votes, 5 binding and 3 non binding. The following votes were received: Binding: Clebert Suconic Michael Andre Pearce Gary Tuly Timothy Bish Christopher Shannon Non Binding: Domenico Francesco Bruscino Francesco Nigro

[ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.15 Released

I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.15.0 Downloads are now available at: http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/download.html This release contains a handful bug fixes and nice improvements. For a complete list of updates: http://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/r

Re: [ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.15 Released

The mirrors are being uploaded, so I will send another announcement including the users mailing list when they are ready. Regards, Domenico Il giorno lun 31 ago 2020 alle ore 16:03 Domenico Francesco Bruscino < bruscin...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > I'm pleased to announce the relea

[ANNOUNCE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.15 Released

nload/release-notes-2.15.0 -- Domenico Francesco Bruscino

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.16.0

+1 * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.16.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 32 and Windows 10 using OpenJDK 8 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming mess

[DISCUSS] Add Artemis web console tests

I would like to add some tests to check the Artemis web console. I have used the selenium framework[1] to create a POC[2]. Do you know a better web application testing framework? [1] https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium [2] https://github.com/brusdev/activemq-artemis/blob/add_console_tests/tests

Re: [DISCUSS] Add Artemis web console tests

like this IMO. > > > > > > Only thing I would say is to document on README or Hacking (maybe > > > both) on how someone would run such tests > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:31 AM Domenico Francesco Bruscino > > > wrote: > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Add Artemis web console tests

niumHQ/selenium [2] https://www.testcontainers.org/modules/webdriver_containers [3] https://chromedriver.chromium.org/ [4] https://github.com/mozilla/geckodriver/ Thanks, Domenico Il giorno mer 16 dic 2020 alle ore 22:04 Domenico Francesco Bruscino < bruscin...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Br

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimal JDK on ActiveMQ Artemis...

+1 Il giorno gio 14 gen 2021 alle ore 21:03 Havret ha scritto: > Finally! > > +1 > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:52 PM Francesco Nigro > wrote: > > > +1 !! > > > > Il giorno gio 14 gen 2021 alle ore 20:33 Christopher Shannon < > > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > > +1 from me,

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.17.0 RC2

+1 * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.17.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 32 and Windows 10 using OpenJDK 8 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming mess

Migrating to Jakarta EE 8

Hi, ActiveMQ Artemis depends on some Apache Geronimo Specs artifacts [1] and Javax artifacts [2] for the Java EE APIs. Most of them could be migrated to their respective Jakarta EE artifacts, given that Jakarta EE 8 provides backwards compatibility within the javax* namespace. The license of Jakar

Re: Migrating to Jakarta EE 8

t available on maven central? > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:42 PM Domenico Francesco Bruscino > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > ActiveMQ Artemis depends on some Apache Geronimo Specs artifacts [1] > > and Javax artifacts [2] for the Java EE APIs. Most of them cou

Re: Migrating to Jakarta EE 8

gt; perhaps introduce separate properties for the different versions > >> needed and have the parent pom change to use the EE 8 versions where > >> needed, and override that in modules needing the EE 9 version instead? > >> > >> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 21:42, D

Re: Migrating to Jakarta EE 8

I have created a issue to track this task: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3221 On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 14:56, Domenico Francesco Bruscino < bruscin...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the best option to solve this problem is to use the solution > proposed Robbie: > have

[PROPOSAL] Change Apache ActiveMQ blog theme

Hi guys, I would like to change the theme of Apache ActiveMQ blog[1]. The current theme is `ASF Projects Theme` while I would like to use the `Gaurav` theme because it is a responsive Bootstrap-based theme using modern HTML5 and CSS3. ASF Projects Theme [image: image.png] Gaurav [image: image.pn

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change Apache ActiveMQ blog theme

2021 at 17:25, Clebert Suconic wrote: > I couldn't see the attachment through the email on the dev list, but I know > what you're talking about.. > > to me it's a no brainer.. You have to.. the theme you're selecting is a lot > more modern. > > On We

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change Apache ActiveMQ blog theme

te of the theme you are suggesting? > > Thanks, > Matt Pavlovich > > > On Apr 14, 2021, at 10:42 AM, Domenico Francesco Bruscino < > bruscin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks Clebert, I'm going to change the theme next week unless someone > > object

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change Apache ActiveMQ blog theme

Hi guys, I have just applied the new theme, see https://blogs.apache.org/activemq/ I can revert this change if someone objects. Thanks, Domenico On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 15:45, Matt Pavlovich wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, > Matt Pavlovich > > > On Apr 14, 2021, at 1:26 PM, Domeni

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change Apache ActiveMQ blog theme

> it may make sense to disable comment on the blog, it seems all are > > spam. If conversations need to happen around a blog post, they can be > > on the user list. > > > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 10:12, Domenico Francesco Bruscino > > wrote: > >>

[DISCUSS] Broker Balancers

Hi, I’m working on a new feature to distribute the incoming client connections across multiple brokers. It provides a native redirection for supported clients and a new management API for other clients. See ARTEMIS-3365 [1], #3634 PR

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.19.0

the parent version of the `amqp-sending-messages-multicast` example is wrong: 2.19.0-SNAPSHOT https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/2.19.0/examples/features/broker-connection/amqp-sending-messages-multicast/pom.xml#L27

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.19.0

+1 * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.17.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` - the parent version in pom.xml of the `amqp-sending-messages-multicast` example is wrong, I agree with Justin this isn't enough to block the release * Ran binary brok

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.20.0

+1 * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.20.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 32 using OpenJDK 11 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages from a qu

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.21.0

+1 (non binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.20.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 32 using OpenJDK 11 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming mess

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.22.0

+1 (non binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.22.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 32 using OpenJDK 11 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming mess

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

+1 non binding * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.23.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 32 using OpenJDK 11 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messag

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.1

+1 non binding * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.23.1<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 32 using OpenJDK 11 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messag

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.24.0

+1 binding * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.24.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 36 using OpenJDK 11 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages f

Re: A question about ClientMessage.setOutputStream()

Hi Jan, calling checkCompletion() or getBodyBuffer() before calling setOutputStream(OutputStream) should fix your issue. Regards, Domenico On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 11:06, Jan Šmucr wrote: > Hello. > > The Large Messages documentation states that: > > setOutputStream(OutputStream): Set the OutputS

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.25.0 Release

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.25.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 36 using OpenJDK 11 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.26.0 release

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.26.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 36 using OpenJDK 11 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: DISCUSS: Memory Leak Test...

JitPack is free for open-source projects and it doesn't require authentication to download artifacts, see https://jitpack.io/ Another free alternative for open-source projects is GitHub Packages but it requires authentication, see https://docs.github.com/en/packages/working-with-a-github-packages-

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.27.0

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.27.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 36 using OpenJDK 17 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.27.1 release

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.27.1<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 36 using OpenJDK 17 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.28.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 36 using OpenJDK 17 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: [activemq-artemis] branch dependabot/maven/org.eclipse.jetty-jetty-server-10.0.14 created (now 53d2d76aa4)

You can customize your GitHub notification settings using the Unwatch menu at https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 at 04:10, selvakumar netaji wrote: > Please help me to unsubscribe this mailing list. > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 3:52 AM wrote: > > > This is an automate

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.29.0

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.29.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 36 using OpenJDK 17 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: [DISCUSS] Naming convention for official Docker images

I agree with Justin that sharing the apache/activemq namespace for both "Classic" and Artemis will cause conflicts and confusion, i.e. the latest tag now is pointing to Apache ActiveMQ Classic 5.18.2 but when an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis version will be pushed, it will point to a container image for

Re: [DISCUSS] Naming convention for official Docker images

+1 for apache/activemq-classic and apache/activemq-artemis Domenico On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 17:26, Justin Bertram wrote: > I'm fine with using: > > - apache/activemq-classic > - apache/activemq-artemis > > > Justin > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:55 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Hi Jus

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.30.0

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.30.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 36 using OpenJDK 17 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.31.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 36 using OpenJDK 17 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.31.2

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.31.2<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 36 using OpenJDK 17 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.32.0

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.32.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 38 using OpenJDK 17 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: Upgrading the Artemis Console

+1 separate repo On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 14:07, Clebert Suconic wrote: > +1 separate repo > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:12 AM Robbie Gemmell > wrote: > > > > That it can actually be run standalone would be another reason I'd > > also choose to go with a separate repo. > > > > Lets allow other fo

Re: Diverting messages to non existing destination

Hi Anton, a divert could use a transformer to change a message destination. What are you using in your feature to change a message destination? Regards, Domenico On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 10:31, Roskvist Anton wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on a feature for Artemis where the use-case is the abi

Re: Diverting messages to non existing destination

+1 for the new divert setting proposed by Clebert On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 18:15, Clebert Suconic wrote: > I think we should do 1. > at that point we look for the address-settings on auto-create, if > auto-create is on, we should then create it. > > > However, to unlock the situation for those who

Re: Diverting messages to non existing destination

:01 AM Domenico Francesco Bruscino < > bruscin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 for the new divert setting proposed by Clebert > > > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 18:15, Clebert Suconic > > > wrote: > > > > > I think we should do 1. > > > at that poi

Re: Diverting messages to non existing destination

I think we should always reuse the server session of the original context because it will be used to execute security checks before creating addresses and queues. On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 09:35, Anton Roskvist wrote: > Thanks for your feedback, and yes, I also agree that adding a boolean to > the

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.33.0

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.33.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 38 using OpenJDK 17 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate from Jira to GitHub Issues

I don't have a strong opinion on migrating from Jira to GitHub Issues. I would prefer GitHub Issues only for its better integration and because new users that reach from the GitHub repository could be confused to not find the `Issues` tabs (most of the GitHub projects use it). Also GitHub Issues h

Re: [VOTE] Include unsubscribe me on all ActiveMQ mail lists..

+1 Binding Vote On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 20:22, Clebert Suconic wrote: > Just for clarification, such change would take effect in all of our > mail lists.. not just user's list.. that goes into Dev, Users, > commits, JIRA, and any other lists that I might be forgetting now. > > On Thu, May 16, 202

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.34.0 release

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.34.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 38 using OpenJDK 17 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.36.0 release

+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.36.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 38 using OpenJDK 17 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: [DISCUSS] HornetQ Acceptor on default acceptor for ActiveMQ Artemis

+1 on deprecating HornetQ protocol and having it off by default On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 at 16:02, Clebert Suconic wrote: > it's not a breaking change.. they can always do : > > ./artemis create --enable-hornetq-adapter... > > that will only affect new servers... new configurations created from > now