Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 6.0.0 revisited

Huge +1 Have just worked through a few Jakarta changes and it is a lot of things you need to change. Sent from my pressure cooker. > On Sep 11, 2023, at 22:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > I agree and it's actually something we likely discussed while ago > related to renaming a

Re: [PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ 5.17.0 end of this week

Yey! And thank you! Sent from my pressure cooker. > On Feb 20, 2022, at 21:55, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I worked on the log4j2 update PR this weekend, fixing almost all unit > tests using a custom appender. I just have to fix the > activemq-web-demo test and squash, and th

Re: read only access in Queue (AWS)

http://activemq.apache.org/security.html SimpleAuth and Role plugins would be the easiest. > On Jun 6, 2019, at 8:40 PM, zhixuen wrote: > > Hi, > > May I know is there a way to configure the queue permission to only allow a > developer to access th

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.5

+1 non binding Sent from my pressure cooker. > On Aug 1, 2018, at 05:32, Jamie G. wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Cheers, > Jamie > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:57 PM Francois Papon > wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks for the release ! >> >> regards, >> >> François Papon >> fpa...@a

Discuss AMQ7015

Hey, We have a situation where we have KahaDB performing recovery, digging deeper into it one issue is that the db.log contains prepared transactions. The MessageDatabase will discard those entries in memory, however it does not remove transaction info from those messages. So on each restart,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.5 Release

+10 > On Jul 24, 2018, at 11:59 AM, Jamie G. wrote: > > Hi All, > > There are a couple of small library updates requested for 5.15.x; I'm > uploading patches (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6990), > and or PRs as I get through testing them - would be nice to collect > these into 5.1

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis becomes ActiveMQ 6

-1 Non binding for the same reasons. > On Dec 6, 2017, at 8:20 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > -1 > > agree with Rob > > Hadrian > > > On 12/05/2017 05:17 AM, Rob Davies wrote: >> [0] - without a clear migration path and tooling to assist existing users >> moving from ActiveMQ 5 to Artemis,

Re: 【KahaDB HA】when will M/S KahaDB support release?

http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html > On Mar 31, 2017, at 1:04 AM, murphyz <739618...@qq.com> wrote: > > > > I found in this page, Ka

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.13.3

+1 > On Apr 26, 2016, at 9:24 AM, jgenender wrote: > > +1 > > Jeff > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-ActiveMQ-5-13-3-tp4711217p4711219.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Accept hornetq code grant and active committers

Big +1 - non binding Sent from my pressure cooker. > On Sep 24, 2014, at 8:44, Gary Tully wrote: > > we need to formally vote to: > > 1) accept the code grant from RedHat for hornetq[1] > 2) invite the active core committers (Clebert Suconic, Andy Taylor, Justin > Bertram, Youg Hao Gao, Mart

Re: RAM or Core for AMQ

Persistence. Sent from my pressure cooker. > On May 31, 2014, at 16:02, surfnerd wrote: > > We are trying ActiveMQ and it's tough to scale beyond 17000 msgs / second. > What affects more for AMQ performance RAM or Core ? > > Can anyone please share insights about AMQ performance at scale ? >

Re: [jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4848) activemq:list - Should include the transport connectors and their urls

You need to change the feature version to point to your build. On Apr 29, 2014, at 10:56 AM, zmhassan (JIRA) wrote: > >[ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13984491#comment-13984491 > ] >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.9.1 release

Tested binary and console basic functionality. +1 - Non binding. On Apr 1, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Hi all, > > I've cut a release candidate for the 5.9.1 patch release. > I have to update JIRA today to determine the exact number of issues resolved > and follow up with anoth

Re: Any objections on using Bootstrap, JQuery, and google fonts in the web console?

ot;aesthetics thing" > that isn't really required. Is MIT Licenses compatible with ASF. > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Johan Edstrom wrote: > >> Bootstrap and Jquery is MIT License, >> I don't know enough about the Google font licenses? Looks like &

Re: Any objections on using Bootstrap, JQuery, and google fonts in the web console?

Bootstrap and Jquery is MIT License, I don't know enough about the Google font licenses? Looks like there are several. - I,e anything that is used at the very least needs to be compatible wit the ASF license. /je On Feb 7, 2014, at 9:07 AM, Zakeria Hassan wrote: > Hi, > > Open source technolo

Re: Node.JS Client Library for Accessing Apache ActiveMQ

I'd push for websockets much more than the rest solution. Especially since node would be able to run outside a browser. On Feb 2, 2014, at 9:39 PM, artnaseef wrote: > Hey Zak - sounds promising. Just watched the Linked-Data talk by Tim > Berners-Lee; intriging. From a technical perspective, I

Re: ActiveMQ Console - let's get the problem defined

It is probably the war file + jetty + spring + sitemesh and everything else. On Feb 2, 2014, at 9:52 PM, artnaseef wrote: > James S: > > Looking at the size of jar files, the web jar is tiny: > >109K Jan 30 19:08 activemq-web-5.10-SNAPSHOT.jar > > Can you point me at more detail of the s

Re: Node.JS Client Library for Accessing Apache ActiveMQ

t; The 'npm' command is how we install libraries to use in node.js > > Here is an example of one that lets you send Soap messages: > > https://github.com/milewise/node-soap > > > > > > >> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Johan Edstrom wrote: >

Re: Node.JS Client Library for Accessing Apache ActiveMQ

cs involved and get to what we > truly want which is quick and easy data access. > > > Thanks, > Zak > > > > > >> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Johan Edstrom wrote: >> >> If you want to use the broker, I'm pretty sure you'll be fin

Re: Node.JS Client Library for Accessing Apache ActiveMQ

If you want to use the broker, I'm pretty sure you'll be fine with stomp.js and web sockets, for jmx, sure Jolokia would be great. There are several ways of slicing and dicing this, spray is also interesting from a purely asynchronous perspective as are many other frameworks. Sent from my pre

Re: [VOTE] Move the ActiveMQ web-console to a sub-project.

hawtio > isn’t at the ASF for other reasons. No they only care about subscriptions, support and revenue sold from that. > > > [1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/activemq/contributors?query=&sort=commits > > > On 30 Jan 2014, at 05:41, Johan Edstrom wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] Move the ActiveMQ web-console to a sub-project.

A big -1 that is non binding. I'm tired of this shit, let us put it all on the table. I probably made around 75k USD last year supporting and writing code around AMQ. If you count the other work I probably made closer to 300k USD, so yes I'm really open. I'm working with or I am surrounded by t

Re: Is skinning hawt.io enough to allow it be be packaged in ActiveMQ?

No, we wrote the NS handling and supporting classes to tie into those DI frameworks, CXF, Camel, AMQ and so on has/have had support for Blueprint, Spring, Guice, CDI and so on in various forms. Those weren't a "skinned" spring namespacehandler for camel residing in a Spring repo with spring acc

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove the old ActiveMQ Console

I see no point in removing the old console until this is resolved. It works, shows queue's and topics, pretty much what is needed. On Jan 3, 2014, at 9:52 AM, jgenender wrote: > Hi Rob, > > I think pulling the web console is playing the nuclear option. The > webconsole is used all over the pl

Re: Integrating ActveMQ with IBM Queue Manager

http://activemq.apache.org/jms-to-jms-bridge.html On Dec 12, 2013, at 7:57 PM, Adam Atawneh wrote: > By Bridge do you mean having an application connecting to both queues and > transferring between them? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Inte

Re: Integrating ActveMQ with IBM Queue Manager

Yes, via a bridge or camel. Sent from my pressure cooker. On Dec 12, 2013, at 21:43, Adam Atawneh wrote: > I am new to the field of message queues. > > My question might be high level. I have a client that has IBM Websphere MQ > and want us to integrate with them via message queues. They have

Re: Outdated documentation on the site

Go, go, go!!! On Nov 14, 2013, at 4:47 PM, Christian Posta wrote: > ummm... no. go for it :) thanks :) > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Some of documentation in the wiki is extremely outdated, like the getting >> started guide [1]. I don't think anybody

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.9.0 - RC2

+1 non binding. On Oct 15, 2013, at 8:16 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > +1 > > Looks good to me! > > On Monday, October 14, 2013, Gary Tully wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've cut a second release candidate for the 5.9.0 release. >> This release has 251 bug fixes and improvements. >> >> It also con

Re: [PROPOSAL] Cleanup on HA website pages

I don't think it is a shared KahaDB at all, it requires a shared filesystem since it relies on a lock in the filesystem. On Oct 7, 2013, at 6:50 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > The AMQ documentation could surely need some love in some areas. > > For example the front page has still a ActiveMQ

Re: ConnectionFailedException with ActiveMQ 5.6, Camel2.10, JBoss5.1

You have a single connection factory and no failover I guess? Try a failover URL and look at the RA adapters I think they are pooling. On Feb 19, 2013, at 20:53, nakshathri wrote: > Hello All, Since last week we have been facing issue while consuming messages > from Active MQs. Here is the snaps

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.8.0

+1 non binding. On Feb 7, 2013, at 23:15, Robert Davies wrote: > +1 > > On 6 February 2013 19:55, Gary Tully wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've just cut a release candidate for the 5.8.0 release. This release has >> 160 bug fixes and improvements. >> >> It also contains a couple of new features

Re: ActiveMQ 5.5 sends infinite duplicate message

Are you acking that message/tx? On Oct 3, 2011, at 18:04, "singaravelu.subu" wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using Active MQ 5.5. In one of my sample project, when I was > experimenting with Queue, I observed the activeMQ server was sending the > same message over and over infinitely to the consumer. >

Re: Collaborate with ActiveMQ project

I'd suggest you write tests, fix things, write a few more tests, get the asserts correct, then you build, deploy and verify? AMQ is no different from any other large project, yeah, it'll take a while to get used to all that code, but by reading the tests, use-case-tests and bug fix tests you d

Re: Java client and C# client sending serialized object

You probably want xml/json or some other sort of payload that is generic. And it is not "really bad" more a fact of life. /je On Dec 20, 2010, at 4:01 PM, Adam Kaminiecki wrote: > Thats really bad. Are you sure that?? Because its message-oriented > middleware! Different client different systems

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.4.2

+1 - non-binding. On Nov 28, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've just cut a release candidate for 5.4.2 release >> >> Could you review the artifacts and vote? >> >> The list of resolved issues is here (56 issues fixed

Re: Checkpoint on High performance journal

ny reference > to any of the document would be highly appreciated. > > Thank you all. > Krishna > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Checkpoint-on-High-performance-journal-tp3008012p3008012.html > Sent from the A

Re: Can't connect from Oracle 11g to the active MQ broker via a Active MQ producer class

plication Server : Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release > 11.2.0.1.0 > > Thanks in advance. > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Can-t-connect-from-Oracle-11g-to-the-active-MQ-broker-via-a-Active-MQ-producer-class-tp2716550p2

Re: Venkat Vankipuram is out of the office.

t;>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Hiram >> >> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com/ > Johan Edstrom j...@opennms.org They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759