[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5712) Broker can deadlock when using queues while producers wait on disk space

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14492768#comment-14492768 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-5712: Perhaps I've missed something but if you're working with

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5712) Broker can deadlock when using queues while producers wait on disk space

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14492866#comment-14492866 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-5712: I too have hit the same limitations of the temp store. In

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5712) Broker can deadlock when using queues while producers wait on disk space

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14493044#comment-14493044 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-5712: I don't see how this plugin puts a requirement on the

[jira] [Created] (AMQ-5636) Upgrade the bundled DBCP component. The current one is very old and buggy.

Paul Gale created AMQ-5636: -- Summary: Upgrade the bundled DBCP component. The current one is very old and buggy. Key: AMQ-5636 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5636 Project: ActiveMQ

[jira] [Created] (AMQ-5505) Add support for the BrokerView MBean to get the up-time in milliseconds

Paul Gale created AMQ-5505: -- Summary: Add support for the BrokerView MBean to get the up-time in milliseconds Key: AMQ-5505 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5505 Project: ActiveMQ

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-5174) Cannot use the JDBCIOExceptionHandler when kahadb is configured with lease-database-locker

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gale updated AMQ-5174: --- Affects Version/s: 5.10.0 Cannot use the JDBCIOExceptionHandler when kahadb is configured with

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5030) Upgrade Camel to latest 2.12.x patch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14018830#comment-14018830 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-5030: Is there any reason why Camel cannot be upgraded to 2.13.1

[jira] [Created] (AMQ-5174) Cannot use the JDBCIOExceptionHandler when kahadb is configured with lease-database-locker

Paul Gale created AMQ-5174: -- Summary: Cannot use the JDBCIOExceptionHandler when kahadb is configured with lease-database-locker Key: AMQ-5174 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5174 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-5091) Upgrade to jolokia 1.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-5091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13989434#comment-13989434 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-5091: It appears that jolokia 1.2.1 is still being built with

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4728) Develop a pluggable locker that can be shared broker-wide for both the persistence adapter as well as the redelivery plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13939746#comment-13939746 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4728: Now that I've re-read this I was wondering if a better

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4365) Allow the Lease Locker to be used with out a JDBCPersistenceAdapter - so it can be a kahadb lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13870028#comment-13870028 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4365: With this change in place does the broker handle the two

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13765545#comment-13765545 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4710: Any movement on this? I'd like to know whether this patch

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gale updated AMQ-4710: --- Attachment: (was: amq-4710.diff) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gale updated AMQ-4710: --- Attachment: amq-4710.diff Latest greatest, and hopefully final, version of test and fix. The

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gale updated AMQ-4710: --- Comment: was deleted (was: Updated patch containing fix for Jira AMQ-4710. Improved the checking for when to

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gale updated AMQ-4710: --- Attachment: (was: amq_4710_2.patch) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gale updated AMQ-4710: --- Attachment: amq-4710.diff Unit test and patch to fix this issue. The first heart-beat after

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13761912#comment-13761912 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4710: Just realized I should have used a StompConnection object

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gale updated AMQ-4710: --- Comment: was deleted (was: I have modified my last patch. The latest has been attached as amq_4710_2.patch)

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gale updated AMQ-4710: --- Attachment: amq_4710_2.patch Patch containing fix for Jira AMQ-4710. Improved the checking for when to

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13758353#comment-13758353 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4710: Sending a frame is sending data on the wire so the send of

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gale updated AMQ-4710: --- Attachment: amq_4710.patch Patch file containing test and fix for this issue. The first

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13757072#comment-13757072 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4710: This problem doesn't just happen on startup. I've been

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4710) The first heart-beat after a connection becomes idle isn't sent as quickly as it should be

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13757189#comment-13757189 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4710: I believe the fix for this condition is as follows. I've

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4365) Allow the Lease Locker to be used with out a JDBCPersistenceAdapter - so it can be a broker lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13754986#comment-13754986 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4365: See here: https://github.com/ppaul/amq-db-lease-locker I

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4365) Allow the Lease Locker to be used with out a JDBCPersistenceAdapter - so it can be a broker lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13752512#comment-13752512 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4365: Since making this initial request back in March I have

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4674) ActiveMQ 5.x does not support the notion of a grace-period for heart beats as supported by the STOMP protocol

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13745128#comment-13745128 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4674: I think something has gone awry here. This implementation

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4674) ActiveMQ 5.x does not support the notion of a grace-period for heart beats as supported by the STOMP protocol

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13745438#comment-13745438 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4674: I have no idea how to write unit tests for ActiveMQ and

[jira] [Comment Edited] (AMQ-4674) ActiveMQ 5.x does not support the notion of a grace-period for heart beats as supported by the STOMP protocol

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13745438#comment-13745438 ] Paul Gale edited comment on AMQ-4674 at 8/20/13 9:21 PM: - I have no

[jira] [Comment Edited] (AMQ-4674) ActiveMQ 5.x does not support the notion of a grace-period for heart beats as supported by the STOMP protocol

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13745438#comment-13745438 ] Paul Gale edited comment on AMQ-4674 at 8/20/13 9:22 PM: - I have no

[jira] [Comment Edited] (AMQ-4674) ActiveMQ 5.x does not support the notion of a grace-period for heart beats as supported by the STOMP protocol

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13745438#comment-13745438 ] Paul Gale edited comment on AMQ-4674 at 8/20/13 9:24 PM: - I have no

[jira] [Created] (AMQ-4674) ActiveMQ 5.x does not support the notion of a grace-period for heart beats as supported by the STOMP protocol

Paul Gale created AMQ-4674: -- Summary: ActiveMQ 5.x does not support the notion of a grace-period for heart beats as supported by the STOMP protocol Key: AMQ-4674 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4674

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-4674) ActiveMQ 5.x does not support the notion of a grace-period for heart beats as supported by the STOMP protocol

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gale updated AMQ-4674: --- Fix Version/s: (was: NEEDS_REVIEWED) 5.9.0 ActiveMQ 5.x does not support the

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-4674) ActiveMQ 5.x does not support the notion of a grace-period for heart beats as supported by the STOMP protocol

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gale updated AMQ-4674: --- Issue Type: Bug (was: New Feature) ActiveMQ 5.x does not support the notion of a grace-period for heart

[jira] [Updated] (AMQ-4674) ActiveMQ 5.x does not support the notion of a grace-period for heart beats as supported by the STOMP protocol

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Gale updated AMQ-4674: --- Description: Regarding the configuration of heart beating the STOMP protocol spec states: - because of

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4365) Allow the Lease Locker to be used with out a JDBCPersistenceAdapter - so it can be a broker lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13597342#comment-13597342 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4365: So I've been able to get a first cut at a lease database

[jira] [Comment Edited] (AMQ-4365) Allow the Lease Locker to be used with out a JDBCPersistenceAdapter - so it can be a broker lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13597342#comment-13597342 ] Paul Gale edited comment on AMQ-4365 at 3/8/13 6:03 PM: So I've been

[jira] [Comment Edited] (AMQ-4365) Allow the Lease Locker to be used with out a JDBCPersistenceAdapter - so it can be a broker lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13597342#comment-13597342 ] Paul Gale edited comment on AMQ-4365 at 3/8/13 6:07 PM: So I've been

[jira] [Comment Edited] (AMQ-4365) Allow the Lease Locker to be used with out a JDBCPersistenceAdapter - so it can be a broker lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13597342#comment-13597342 ] Paul Gale edited comment on AMQ-4365 at 3/8/13 6:10 PM: So I've been

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-4365) Allow the Lease Locker to be used with out a JDBCPersistenceAdapter - so it can be a broker lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13597376#comment-13597376 ] Paul Gale commented on AMQ-4365: Another point worth noting is that the JDBCPersistenAdapter

[jira] [Comment Edited] (AMQ-4365) Allow the Lease Locker to be used with out a JDBCPersistenceAdapter - so it can be a broker lock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13597342#comment-13597342 ] Paul Gale edited comment on AMQ-4365 at 3/8/13 6:28 PM: So I've been