Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.1 release

+1 (non-binding) Thanks! regards, On 30/11/2023 14:17, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, Following the 6.0.0 release, I submit 6.0.1 to your vote. This release includes fixes on top of 6.0.0, especially: - fix Jakarta namespace in ActiveMQ RA - fix OSGi headers in activemq-cf and activemq

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 release (take #2)

+1 (non-binding) Thanks very much to all the team for this major release! regards, François On 14/11/2023 11:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, After several weeks of work, I'm glad to submit Apache ActiveMQ 6.0.0 release to your vote. This release is a big milestone for ActiveMQ, sta

Re: [PROPOSAL] Switch to GitHub issues/actions after ActiveMQ 6.0.0

Hi, I think moving Artemis as TLP make sense because as ActiveMQ is still heavily maintain/use and a lot of improvements are defined in the roadmap, we cannot see from users perspective that Artemis could be the next major version of ActiveMQ. regards, François On 17/10/2023 08:07, Jean-Ba

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 6.0.0 revisited

Why not simply ActiveMQ and Artemis? This is how people used to name the 2 projects, I never eared someone say "ActiveMQ Classic". regards, François On 12/09/2023 13:07, Robbie Gemmell wrote: Same thoughts as last time you proposed it really. Adding Leto would not be an improvement for me,

Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 6.0.0 revisited

Hi, Make totally sense, especially about keeping the javax version supported, so need to split in 2 major versions. Big +1 regards, François On 11/09/2023 23:14, Christopher Shannon wrote: First, I realize that this thread is likely to cause a fight based on past history and probably not g

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change OSGi packaging for ActiveMQ 5.19.x

Hi JB, Sounds good to me. Just some side questions: - You're talking about having an embedded broker in Karaf so does it mean that we can also have some Karaf command to control the broker? (like we can have with Camel) - About the client, should we will need to use Pax-JMS or not? If not,

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.5 release

+1 (non-binding) Thanks JB! regards, On 28/06/2023 15:40, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.5 release to your vote. This release is a maintenance release on the 5.17.x series bringing: - fix on stale queues when a connection is long to shutdown - fix on KahaDB

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.2 release

+1 (non-binding) Thanks JB! regards, On 28/06/2023 07:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi, I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.2 release to your vote. This release is a maintenance release on the 5.18.x series bringing: - fix potential NPE when removing consumer with selector - fix composite consume

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.1 release

+1 (non-binding) Thanks JB! regards, François On 11/04/2023 11:26, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi, I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.18.1 release to your vote. This release fixes activemq-client-jakarta where the META-INF/services file was missing in the artifact. You can take a look on the Releas

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.6 release

+1 (non-binding) Thanks JB! regards, François On 10/02/2023 16:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, We receive several requests to provide a new (final) ActiveMQ 5.16.6 release, including few security fixes/improvements. So, I submit ActiveMQ 5.16.6 release to your vote. This one should

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.3

+1 (non-binding) Thanks JB! regards, Francois On 29/11/2022 16:31, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi all, I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.3 release to your vote. This release includes 32 fixes and improvements, especially: - Fix ActiveMQ Console on Karaf 4.4.x - Fix Jolokia startup on Windows platf

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release

+1 (non-binding) Thanks to all the team for the great work on ActiveMQ! regards, François On 26/08/2022 07:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi, I submit the ActiveMQ 5.17.2 release to your vote. This release includes 50 fixes and improvements, especially: - Spring 5.3.22 update - Jackson 2.1

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.15 release (take #3)

+1 (non-binding) Thanks JB! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 22/04/2021 à 08:13, michael.andre.pearce a écrit : > +1 (Sent from my Galaxy > Original message From: Christopher Shannon > Date: 21/04/2021 15:04 (GMT+00:00) To: > dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOT

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.2 release

+1 (non-binding) Thanks JB! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 21/04/2021 à 09:49, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.2 to your vote. > > This release includes important fixes and updates on the 5.16.x series, > especially; > - fix on the broker

Re: [DISCUSSION] ActiveMQ 5.x roadmap, codename ActiveMQ Missus

Hi JB, I think it make a lot of sense to focus on this points and I will be more than happy to contribute! There is a very large community of users around the ActiveMQ 5.x and it's still very widely use in production environment. I'm not sure that the users actually understand the difference bet