Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2256
@jbertram yes, the broker can add additional message annotations as long as
those being added follow the rules from the spec, if the user adds something
that the remote doesn&#
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2452
ARTEMIS-1938 Update Qpid JMS and proton-j to latest
Updates Qpid JMS to v0.39.0 and proton-j to v0.31.0
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2448#discussion_r239486511
--- Diff:
artemis-jms-client/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/client/ActiveMQDestination.java
---
@@ -386,14 +386,27 @@ public
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2448#discussion_r238785616
--- Diff:
artemis-jms-client/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/client/ActiveMQDestination.java
---
@@ -386,14 +386,27 @@ public
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2448#discussion_r238416943
--- Diff:
tests/jms-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/tests/TemporaryDestinationTest.java
---
@@ -265,6 +266,126 @@ public
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2433
ARTEMIS-1938 Update proton-j to 0.30.0 and Qpid JMS 0.37.0
Update to latest proton-j release and refactor the dispostion code to use
the new type enums to better deal with the
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2423
@michaelandrepearce I agree, that expiry bit qualifies as a bug and should
also be fixed to disallow modification
---
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2423
I'd say none of them are really the right way to go. I'd suggest your
organization create a custom broker plugin that does whatever protocol
violating things are acceptable
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2423
-1
This is actually worse that before because now you've not only violated the
AMQP spec in regards to changing the User ID portion of the properties section
but also open
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2422
@michaelandrepearce I may have worked due to a bug that allowed the broker
to violate the AMQP specification but was fixed later
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1092) and
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2422
-1
The properties section of an AMQP message is immutable and cannot be
changed by the broker as per the AMQP 1.0 specification (Section 3.2)
http://docs.oasis
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2383
This isn't really a NO-JIRA commit if you are adding a test against a
specific JIRA is it? No reason I can see to put a NO-JIRA on this instead of
just tagging against the JIRA th
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2329
ARTEMIS-2096 Refactor AMQMessage abstraction
Major refactoring of the AMQPMessage abstraction to resolve
some issue of message corruption still present in the code and
improve
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2309
NO-JIRA Fix condition timeouts to avoid spurious failures
The waits for expiration are set at the same value as the expiration
interval default to in the test support setup so on
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2308#discussion_r217179064
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-amqp-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/protocol/amqp/broker/AMQPMessage.java
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2306#discussion_r217160287
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-amqp-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/protocol/amqp/broker/AMQPSessionCallback.java
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2306
This should be referencing some ActiveMQ Artemis JIRA issue and not an JIRA
from an external tracker.
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2308
ARTEMIS-2083 Decode only the relavent portions of the message
Ensure that the Body of the message is never decoded in the partial
decode phase of the message processing and also
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2284
Sync'd with master, test failure seems unrelated to AMQP
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2304
ARTEMIS-2082 Reset buffer valid flag after re-encoding the message
Once a re-encode of the message is done the buffer is not being marked
as valid and so subsequent checks on the
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2284
I targeted 2.7.0 in the JIRA as I don't think it is a critical fix can add
it on next cycle if you want.
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2284
ARTEMIS-2067 Clean up some code in the AMQP protocol handling paths
Cleans up some of the code on the proton event handler, most noteable:
1. Fix IOCallback creation on each
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2277
ARTEMIS-2062 Only attempt to refill credit when needed
Avoid firing the offerProducerCredit code when we know that the credit
is low enough that a refill is needed which avoids lock
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2272
@gemmellr I've pushed some updates based on comments, thanks for reviewing
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2272
ARTEMIS-2057 Fix runaway credit grants
Ensure the broker looks at local receiver credit when checking for
credit top off threshold and then do a proper top off back to the high
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2269
@michaelandrepearce Seems the tcnative dependency used for those tests was
to old, fixed now.
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2269
ARTEMIS-1938 Update Qpid JMS along with Proton and Netty
Update the Qpid JMS and Proton dependencies to lastest and sync Netty
with the 4.1.28.Final version used by Qpid JMS to
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r207644233
--- Diff: src/example/csharp/HelloWorld/HelloWorld.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r207644379
--- Diff: src/example/csharp/HelloWorld/HelloWorld.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r207643922
--- Diff: src/example/csharp/HelloWorld/HelloWorld.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r207644112
--- Diff: src/example/csharp/HelloWorld/HelloWorld.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r207643986
--- Diff: src/example/csharp/HelloWorld/HelloWorld.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r207643307
--- Diff: src/main/csharp/ConnectionMetaData.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2
I would just make the changes and amend the commit and force push it to the
PR branch, you can also commit things locally and squash later if you prefer
that route. Basically until this
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204159506
--- Diff: README.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+# NMS-AMQP
--- End diff --
Apache-NMS-AMQP
---
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204161653
--- Diff: src/main/csharp/Connection.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,1158 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204159065
--- Diff: NMS.AMQP/NMS-AMQP.csproj ---
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+Debug
+AnyCPU
+{0D8CF699
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204160011
--- Diff: src/main/csharp/Connection.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,1158 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204160492
--- Diff: NMS.AMQP/App.config ---
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+
--- End diff --
missing license header
---
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204160181
--- Diff: NMS.AMQP/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+using System.Reflection;
--- End diff --
Missing license
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204160304
--- Diff: NMS.AMQP/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+using System.Reflection;
+using System.Runtime.CompilerServices
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204159176
--- Diff: NMS.AMQP/NMS-AMQP.csproj ---
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+Debug
+AnyCPU
+{0D8CF699
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204159358
--- Diff: NMS.AMQP/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+using System.Reflection;
+using System.Runtime.CompilerServices
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204160128
--- Diff: README.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+# NMS-AMQP
--- End diff --
Should be Apache NMS AMQP
---
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204159401
--- Diff: NMS.AMQP/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+using System.Reflection;
--- End diff --
License header
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204160391
--- Diff: NMS.AMQP/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+using System.Reflection;
+using System.Runtime.CompilerServices
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2#discussion_r204158230
--- Diff: HelloWorld/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+using System.Reflection;
--- End diff --
Missing License
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2
If you can't work out the squash then another way to fix things is to back
out the commit using a "git reset --soft HEAD~X" where 'X' is the number of
commits and
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/2
It is generally best practice to squash commits into one on a PR to make
life easier for the reviews and to make the commit history simpler. We don't
really need to preserve a c
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/1
This looks like it could be closed now given a new PR(#2) with the client
code is now open
---
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2174#discussion_r201156531
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-amqp-protocol/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/protocol/amqp/converter/message
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-nms-amqp/pull/1
The move of legacy code was done properly now on the Apache repo, this PR
needs to be rebased and squashed into one commit for review.
---
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2174#discussion_r201007171
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-amqp-protocol/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/protocol/amqp/converter/message
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2174#discussion_r200759349
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-amqp-protocol/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/protocol/amqp/converter/message
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2174#discussion_r200754867
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-amqp-protocol/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/protocol/amqp/converter/message
Github user tabish121 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2168
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2168
RTEMIS-1941 Preserve AMQP body section type on "large" messages
When "large" messages are converted to / from core in order to be stored
in the large message s
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145
There are no updates to proton-j at this time, only client fixes
---
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145
The only reason you might want to take it is that it contains several fixes
for failover handling and artemis provides a Karaf feature for an AMQP client
so your users could benefit
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145
I targeted the JIRA at 2.7.0 for that reason.
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2145
ARTEMIS-1938 Update to Qpid JMS 0.33.0
Update to latest release of Qpid JMS
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2135#discussion_r194568008
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/AmqpNoHearbeatsTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,83
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2089
Doesn't that sort of defeat the point of using source control ?
---
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2106
If it is fixing something then it needs a test. If it is not fixing
something than the JIRA description needs to be changed as it makes it sound
like it is fixing something, and
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2106
There's no tests here, how do we know this does or does not fix an issue
that may or may not exist given there's no test provided to observe it ?
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2087
ARTEMIS-1861 Set a max-frame-size on AMQP connections by default
Configure a value of 128KB for AMQP max frame size by default to improve
overall performance and provide a limit on
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2084#discussion_r187643834
--- Diff:
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/amqp/JMSMessageProducerTest.java
---
@@ -70,10
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2067
ARTEMIS-1847 Update to Netty 4.1.24.Final
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/tabish121/activemq-artemis ARTEMIS-1847
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2064
ARTEMIS-1843 Update Qpid JMS 0.32.0 and Proton-j 0.27.1
Use new no copy variants for the delivery send and receive and make
use of the ReadableBuffer type that is now used to
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2053
@clebertsuconic ok, I was about to fix it myself. I confirmed that the fix
does seem to resolve the issue, I can no longer reproduce it here using the
test and an external broker or
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2053
Now you have a checkstyle violation :)
---
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2053#discussion_r185075306
--- Diff:
tests/smoke-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/smoke/crossprotocol/MultiThreadConvertTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,173
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2031
Ok, I'll be "the decider". Will check with franz to see how much it's
worth to him
---
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2031
The change as it is seems acceptable as it does reduce unnecessary
allocations when ByteMessages types cross to OpenWire. I've reviewed the
changes as it relates to the Ope
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2031
That would be the more ideal thing to do yes.
---
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2031
@franz1981 So I think that you could avoid subclassing the
ActiveMQBytesMessage if you built the properties yourself instead of calling
setObjectProperty in setAMQMsgObjectProperties in
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1985
That's twice now today I've rebased. Test failure doesn't seem related to
AMQP
---
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1985
I updated the patch to remove the duplicate decode which seems to have been
the root cause of the other test failure.
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1985
ARTEMIS-1780 Handle conversion of large ObjectMessage types
Make sure the correct buffer is used when decoding the stored Core
message that originated from the conversion of an AMQP
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1980#discussion_r178144111
--- Diff: artemis-distribution/pom.xml ---
@@ -102,6 +102,11 @@
artemis-amqp-protocol
${project.version
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1961
When running in the IDE the new test works fine, however when I run the
AMQP tests from the command line the new test produces an error as below which
seems to indicate the test
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1928
Need @clebertsuconic to give it a look
---
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1928
@franz1981 I've updated this PR with changes to the common path based on
your suggestions to me over on my fork. Thanks for the review and ideas, even
better now.
---
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1918
@franz1981 @clebertsuconic I've sent an alternate PR #1928 which performs
the send without any buffer copy unless necessary due to message redelivery or
existence of original del
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1928
ARTEMIS-1722 Don't copy message bytes unless needed
Alternate patch that doesn't copy the message bytes unless doing a
redelivery or skipping delivery annotations in th
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1925#discussion_r171918979
--- Diff:
artemis-protocols/artemis-openwire-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/protocol/openwire/OpenWireConnection.java
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1918
@franz1981 It doesn't look like the buffer could be contended unless
perhaps the consumer was able to be subscribed to more than one queue at a time
via some sort of composite
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1916
ARTEMIS-1504 Update Qpid JMS to 0.30.0 and proton-j to 0.26.0
Updates to latest Qpid JMS and the latest Proton-J release, use new
proton-j setting to disable read-only buffers use to
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1909
ARTEMIS-1712 Add additional null check in TX rollback handler
Check for AMQSession being null before handling various TX state checks
in order to ensure the correct errors are
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1903
Looks good. +1
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1905
ARTEMIS-1707 Check for already exists exceptions and ignore
For address and queue create check for the already exists exceptions and
ignore as another client might have just created
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1903#discussion_r171066273
--- Diff: docs/user-manual/en/configuring-transports.md ---
@@ -403,6 +403,15 @@ following additional properties:
This property is only
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1903#discussion_r171060932
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/remoting/impl/netty/NettyAcceptor.java
---
@@ -468,8 +473,12 @@ public
Github user tabish121 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/commit/6470e7e64d883282624619adc9d4816fa1688a1e#commitcomment-27609794
Merged it, looked ok to me as well.
---
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1802
ARTEMIS-1504 Update Qpid JMS to 0.29.0 and proton-j to 0.25.0
Updates to latest Qpid JMS and the latest Proton-J release
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1773
@jbertram @jostbg As far as I can see the patch looks correct, it would
seem to make more sense to return the remote container ID here than the locally
generated server side value as
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1769
ARTEMIS-1576 Fix test that was broken with changes on this issue
The test is using the wrong indices for the destinations it uses so they
don't match the one's created i
Github user tabish121 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1734
Given that there is a JIRA related to this doesn't it seem like the commit
should carry the JIRA tag and not a "NO-JIRA" tag?
---
Github user tabish121 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1722#discussion_r157260287
--- Diff:
tests/jms-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/tests/SecurityTest.java
---
@@ -169,6 +180,71 @@ public void
GitHub user tabish121 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1714
ARTEMIS-1504 Update Qpid JMS to 0.28.0 and proton-j to 0.24.0
Updates to latest Qpid JMS and the latest Proton-J release
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
