Dev list got dropped so adding back in (really this probably only belongs
the dev list anyways)
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:08 PM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Many of those pull requests are years old. Furthermore no one is saying
> there is no interest in a
I think as a project we need to be clear in direction here with one roadmap. To
avoid users confusion.
I was on the understanding that as a community and PMC a roadmap was already
agreed.
And this was for artemis to become activemq 6 was agreed and once it has all
features (and more) of
Hi JB,
I think it make a lot of sense to focus on this points and I will be
more than happy to contribute!
There is a very large community of users around the ActiveMQ 5.x and
it's still very widely use in production environment.
I'm not sure that the users actually understand the difference
So I will preface this by saying hopefully my comments are not taken the
wrong way and turn into a big fight but instead can lead to a productive
discussion about the next steps.
First, I'm certainly not opposed to anyone who wants to work on modernizing
and adding features to existing software.
Hi all,
I would like to discuss with you about the ActiveMQ 5.x roadmap.
Even if Artemis is there, the stack is different and we still have lot
of users on ActiveMQ, and, as a ActiveMQ 5.x fan and contributor, I
think it's worth to give a new "dimension" to ActiveMQ 5.x.
As all Apache projects,
